Sandra Nilsson, Elisabet Östlund, Yvonne Thalén, Ulrika Löfkvist
{"title":"Validation of the Language ENvironment Analysis in Swedish Children.","authors":"Sandra Nilsson, Elisabet Östlund, Yvonne Thalén, Ulrika Löfkvist","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) is a technological tool designed for comprehensive recordings and automated analysis of young children's daily language and auditory environments. LENA recordings play a crucial role in both clinical interventions and research, offering insights into the amount of spoken language children are exposed to in their homes, including adult word count (AWC) and child vocalization count (CVC). Although LENA was initially developed for American English, it has been validated in various other languages. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of LENA in a Swedish context by comparing its automatic estimates with human transcriptions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-six children aged 11-29 months participated in the validation study. A total of 540 min (9 hr) of recordings were transcribed by one experienced speech-language pathologist and two special educators. Interrater agreement over 150 min was notably higher for CVC (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .97, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.91, .99], <i>r</i> = .96, <i>p</i> < .001) compared to AWC, which yielded an ICC of .82 (95% CI [.15, .96], <i>r</i> = .80, <i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both estimated CVC and AWC (<i>n</i> = 36) were significantly correlated with human transcriptions (<i>r</i> = .79 and .82, respectively; <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings align with prior validation studies, indicating that LENA is suitable for use in a Swedish context, particularly for families with children aged 11-29 months. Nonetheless, additional validation studies are necessary, particularly focusing on younger infants, to enhance our understanding of the tool's reliability in preverbal children and their caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1902-1916"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) is a technological tool designed for comprehensive recordings and automated analysis of young children's daily language and auditory environments. LENA recordings play a crucial role in both clinical interventions and research, offering insights into the amount of spoken language children are exposed to in their homes, including adult word count (AWC) and child vocalization count (CVC). Although LENA was initially developed for American English, it has been validated in various other languages. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of LENA in a Swedish context by comparing its automatic estimates with human transcriptions.
Method: Thirty-six children aged 11-29 months participated in the validation study. A total of 540 min (9 hr) of recordings were transcribed by one experienced speech-language pathologist and two special educators. Interrater agreement over 150 min was notably higher for CVC (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .97, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.91, .99], r = .96, p < .001) compared to AWC, which yielded an ICC of .82 (95% CI [.15, .96], r = .80, p = .006).
Results: Both estimated CVC and AWC (n = 36) were significantly correlated with human transcriptions (r = .79 and .82, respectively; p < .001).
Conclusions: The findings align with prior validation studies, indicating that LENA is suitable for use in a Swedish context, particularly for families with children aged 11-29 months. Nonetheless, additional validation studies are necessary, particularly focusing on younger infants, to enhance our understanding of the tool's reliability in preverbal children and their caregivers.
期刊介绍：
Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
