Gamified assessments of pediatric upper extremity function: A systematic review and appraisal

Abstract

Background

Assessing upper extremity function accurately in the clinic hinges on valid, reliable outcome measures and patient engagement. Especially in pediatric care and research, video-game-based and play-based assessments may help motivate performance and support more effective clinical evaluation.

Purpose

This systematic review critically appraised the gamified assessments available for pediatric upper extremity function.

Study Design

Systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023460034).

Methods

Databases included PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus. Eligible studies evaluated psychometrics and included children under 18 years. Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and rated psychometrics and evidence quality by the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology.

Results

Reviewers screened 2513 studies; 27 reports describing nine outcome measures were included. The observer-rated Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) family, which includes four age-based versions for children with unilateral hand dysfunction and the Both Hands Assessment for bilateral dysfunction, has extensive psychometric evidence. These are well-structured, reliable, and feasible assessments that engage patients with age-appropriate toys and board games while evaluating functions such as grasp, fine-motor adjustment, and bimanual coordination. Validation for additional upper extremity conditions is warranted. We also recommend two video-game-based kinematic measures, which quantify upper extremity function objectively. Abilities Captured Through Interactive Video Evaluation (ACTIVE) is appropriate for degenerative neuromuscular diseases; ACTIVE was the only kinematic assessment in this review with at least moderate-quality evidence of sufficient psychometrics. However, based on preliminary evidence, a recently developed dragon-themed video game is a strong candidate for quantifying joint range of motion, potentially serving a broader patient population than ACTIVE.

Conclusions

Overall, we endorse the AHA family as a set of well-structured, reliable, and feasible observer-rated assessments that engage patients through play sessions thoughtfully geared toward different developmental stages. Two kinematic measures are promising and warrant further study.