Reassessment of the possible size, form, weight, cruising speed, and growth parameters of the extinct megatooth shark, Otodus megalodon (Lamniformes: Otodontidae), and new evolutionary insights into its gigantism, life history strategies, ecology, and extinction.
Kenshu Shimada, Ryosuke Motani, Jake J Wood, Phillip C Sternes, Taketeru Tomita, Mohamad Bazzi, Alberto Collareta, Joel H Gayford, Julia Türtscher, Patrick L Jambura, Jürgen Kriwet, Romain Vullo, Douglas J Long, Adam P Summers, John G Maisey, Charlie Underwood, David J Ward, Harry M Maisch, Victor J Perez, Iris Feichtinger, Gavin J P Naylor, Joshua K Moyer, Timothy E Higham, João Paulo C B da Silva, Hugo Bornatowski, Gerardo González-Barba, Michael L Griffiths, Martin A Becker, Mikael Siversson
{"title":"Reassessment of the possible size, form, weight, cruising speed, and growth parameters of the extinct megatooth shark, <i>Otodus megalodon</i> (Lamniformes: Otodontidae), and new evolutionary insights into its gigantism, life history strategies, ecology, and extinction.","authors":"Kenshu Shimada, Ryosuke Motani, Jake J Wood, Phillip C Sternes, Taketeru Tomita, Mohamad Bazzi, Alberto Collareta, Joel H Gayford, Julia Türtscher, Patrick L Jambura, Jürgen Kriwet, Romain Vullo, Douglas J Long, Adam P Summers, John G Maisey, Charlie Underwood, David J Ward, Harry M Maisch, Victor J Perez, Iris Feichtinger, Gavin J P Naylor, Joshua K Moyer, Timothy E Higham, João Paulo C B da Silva, Hugo Bornatowski, Gerardo González-Barba, Michael L Griffiths, Martin A Becker, Mikael Siversson","doi":"10.26879/1502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Otodus megalodon</i> (Lamniformes: Otodontidae) is an iconic Neogene shark, but the lack of well-preserved skeletons has hampered our understanding of various aspects of its biology. Here, we reassess some of its biological properties using a new approach, based on known vertebral specimens of <i>O. megalodon</i> and 165 species of extinct and extant neoselachian sharks across ten orders. Using the median neurocranial and caudal fin proportions relative to the trunk proportion among non-mitsukurinid/non-alopiid lamniforms, we show that <i>O. megalodon</i> could have had a slender body and possibly reached about 24.3 m in length. Allometric considerations indicate that a stout body plan like the extant white shark <i>(Carcharodon carcharias)</i> for <i>O. megalodon</i> could have incurred excessive hydrodynamic costs, further supporting the interpretation that <i>O. megalodon</i> likely had a slenderer body than <i>C. carcharias</i>. A 24.3-m-long <i>O. megalodon</i> may have weighed around 94 t, with an estimated cruising speed of 2.1-3.5 km h<sup>-1</sup>. A reanalysis of vertebral growth bands suggests a size at birth of 3.6-3.9 m for <i>O. megalodon</i>, supporting the previous interpretations of its ovoviviparity and embryos' intrauterine oophagous behavior, but less likely the need for nursery areas. Additional inferred growth patterns corroborated by the known fossil record support the hypothesis that the emergence of <i>C. carcharias</i> during the Early Pliocene is at least partly responsible for the demise of <i>O. megalodon</i> due to competition for resources. These interpretations are working hypotheses expected to serve as reasonable reference points for future studies on the biology of <i>O. megalodon</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":56100,"journal":{"name":"Palaeontologia Electronica","volume":"28 1","pages":"1502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7617484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palaeontologia Electronica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26879/1502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Otodus megalodon (Lamniformes: Otodontidae) is an iconic Neogene shark, but the lack of well-preserved skeletons has hampered our understanding of various aspects of its biology. Here, we reassess some of its biological properties using a new approach, based on known vertebral specimens of O. megalodon and 165 species of extinct and extant neoselachian sharks across ten orders. Using the median neurocranial and caudal fin proportions relative to the trunk proportion among non-mitsukurinid/non-alopiid lamniforms, we show that O. megalodon could have had a slender body and possibly reached about 24.3 m in length. Allometric considerations indicate that a stout body plan like the extant white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) for O. megalodon could have incurred excessive hydrodynamic costs, further supporting the interpretation that O. megalodon likely had a slenderer body than C. carcharias. A 24.3-m-long O. megalodon may have weighed around 94 t, with an estimated cruising speed of 2.1-3.5 km h-1. A reanalysis of vertebral growth bands suggests a size at birth of 3.6-3.9 m for O. megalodon, supporting the previous interpretations of its ovoviviparity and embryos' intrauterine oophagous behavior, but less likely the need for nursery areas. Additional inferred growth patterns corroborated by the known fossil record support the hypothesis that the emergence of C. carcharias during the Early Pliocene is at least partly responsible for the demise of O. megalodon due to competition for resources. These interpretations are working hypotheses expected to serve as reasonable reference points for future studies on the biology of O. megalodon.
IF 0.8 4区 经济学Theory and DecisionPub Date : 1975-05-01DOI: 10.1007/BF00169102
J. Marschak, M. Degroot, J. Marschak, K. Borch, H. Chernoff, Morris De Groot, Morris De Groot, R. Dorfman, W. Edwards, T. Ferguson, K. Miyasawa, P. Randolph, L. J. Savage, Robert Schlaifer, R. L. Winkler
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1997, Palaeontologia Electronica (PE) is the longest running open-access, peer-reviewed electronic journal and covers all aspects of palaeontology. PE uses an external double-blind peer review system for all manuscripts. Copyright of scientific papers is held by one of the three sponsoring professional societies at the author''s choice. Reviews, commentaries, and other material is placed in the public domain. PE papers comply with regulations for taxonomic nomenclature established in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants.