A survey of patient-physician communication regarding treatment prospects and goal setting in the management of major depressive disorder in Japan.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s12888-025-06606-9
Takashi Tsuboi, Takeo Nakayama, Junko Horie, Fumie Tokuda, Yoshiya Moriguchi, Tatsuya Hoshino
{"title":"A survey of patient-physician communication regarding treatment prospects and goal setting in the management of major depressive disorder in Japan.","authors":"Takashi Tsuboi, Takeo Nakayama, Junko Horie, Fumie Tokuda, Yoshiya Moriguchi, Tatsuya Hoshino","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06606-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating cause of disability worldwide. Recently, it has been suggested that individualized goal setting may play a role in patient-centered recovery. This study aimed to survey the landscape of patient-physician communication around goal setting for MDD treatment, as well as understand whether goal setting using the SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound) framework is associated with positive treatment indicators in MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in Japan (≥ 18 years of age) who self-reported a verified MDD diagnosis were eligible to complete a self-administered survey through the Personal Health Record service, a web-based smartphone app. Patients were asked about whether they communicated with physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. A 'SMART-Goal score' tool was developed to evaluate patient goals against the five SMART criteria. Treatment satisfaction scores and scores on the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale Short Version (TRUST) were assessed as indicators of outcomes in this study. Descriptive questions were used to explore patients' perceptions of goal setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 466 patients were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The majority (70.0%) reported communicating with their physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. These patients (Com + group) had a median (Q1, Q3) TRUST score of 70.0 (60.0, 80.0), compared with 50.0 (40.0, 70.0) in patients who reported an absence of communication (Com - group). Median (Q1, Q3) treatment satisfaction scores were 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) and 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) for the Com + and Com - groups, respectively. In high SMART-Goal scoring groups, approximately 75% of patients exceeded the overall median scores for TRUST (70.0) or treatment satisfaction (5.0) reported for the Com + group; only 25% of patients in low SMART-Goal scoring groups achieved the same in either measure. Most patients (89.3%) who set goals recommended goal setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study suggests that communication between patients and physicians regarding goal setting in MDD treatment may be associated with positive patient perceptions of treatment. High-quality SMART goal setting also appears to have positive aspects for patients with MDD, which may in turn affect treatment outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000050370) on 17 February 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"255"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06606-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating cause of disability worldwide. Recently, it has been suggested that individualized goal setting may play a role in patient-centered recovery. This study aimed to survey the landscape of patient-physician communication around goal setting for MDD treatment, as well as understand whether goal setting using the SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound) framework is associated with positive treatment indicators in MDD.

Methods: Patients in Japan (≥ 18 years of age) who self-reported a verified MDD diagnosis were eligible to complete a self-administered survey through the Personal Health Record service, a web-based smartphone app. Patients were asked about whether they communicated with physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. A 'SMART-Goal score' tool was developed to evaluate patient goals against the five SMART criteria. Treatment satisfaction scores and scores on the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale Short Version (TRUST) were assessed as indicators of outcomes in this study. Descriptive questions were used to explore patients' perceptions of goal setting.

Results: In total, 466 patients were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The majority (70.0%) reported communicating with their physicians about treatment prospects and/or goals. These patients (Com + group) had a median (Q1, Q3) TRUST score of 70.0 (60.0, 80.0), compared with 50.0 (40.0, 70.0) in patients who reported an absence of communication (Com - group). Median (Q1, Q3) treatment satisfaction scores were 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) and 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) for the Com + and Com - groups, respectively. In high SMART-Goal scoring groups, approximately 75% of patients exceeded the overall median scores for TRUST (70.0) or treatment satisfaction (5.0) reported for the Com + group; only 25% of patients in low SMART-Goal scoring groups achieved the same in either measure. Most patients (89.3%) who set goals recommended goal setting.

Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that communication between patients and physicians regarding goal setting in MDD treatment may be associated with positive patient perceptions of treatment. High-quality SMART goal setting also appears to have positive aspects for patients with MDD, which may in turn affect treatment outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial findings.

Trial registration: Registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000050370) on 17 February 2023.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of night shifts on the physical and mental health of psychiatric medical staff: the influence of occupational burnout. The role of metacognition and social cognition in childhood trauma effecting on prognosis: 1-year follow-up study in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. A survey of patient-physician communication regarding treatment prospects and goal setting in the management of major depressive disorder in Japan. Abnormalities in brain complexity in children with autism spectrum disorder: a sleeping state functional MRI study. Effects of oxidative stress and GDNF on patients with bipolar disorder: a prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1