Alpha-Gal Sensitization Dynamics in Individuals After Tick Bites With or Without Erythema Migrans

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Clinical and Experimental Allergy Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1111/cea.70011
Tamara van Gorkom, Michiel Heron, Agnetha Hofhuis, Carlijn Jongerius, Fiona R. M. van der Klis, Hanneke N. G. Oude Elberink, Hein Sprong, Steven F. T. Thijsen, Kristin Kremer
{"title":"Alpha-Gal Sensitization Dynamics in Individuals After Tick Bites With or Without Erythema Migrans","authors":"Tamara van Gorkom,&nbsp;Michiel Heron,&nbsp;Agnetha Hofhuis,&nbsp;Carlijn Jongerius,&nbsp;Fiona R. M. van der Klis,&nbsp;Hanneke N. G. Oude Elberink,&nbsp;Hein Sprong,&nbsp;Steven F. T. Thijsen,&nbsp;Kristin Kremer","doi":"10.1111/cea.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>α-Gal syndrome (AGS) is an emerging tick-borne disease characterised by the development of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) antibodies against galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal), a carbohydrate found in most mammalian species, but not in humans. AGS occurs in individuals with a history of tick bites. Currently, no data exist on α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, including those with tick bites or erythema migrans (EM). Therefore, this study aimed to determine the rate of α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, to assess α-gal sIgE seroconversion after tick bites, and to determine the relationship between EM and α-gal sIgE in serum. α-Gal sensitisation rates were assessed in individuals with tick bites (TB), EM, and the general population. Blood samples were collected from TB- and EM-cases at baseline and again after 3 months. Single blood samples from controls were selected from a Dutch population survey. In total, 156 TB-cases, 160 EM-cases, and 316 population controls were included. α-Gal sensitisation rates were 1.9% for population controls and 10.3% and 19.1% for TB- and EM-cases at baseline, respectively (cut-off α-gal sIgE:  ≥ 0.10 kU<sub>A</sub>/L). Rates increased to 17.9% for TB-cases, comparable to the 16.9% for EM-cases 3 months after EM-development. Distinct α-gal sensitisation rates were observed between TB- and EM-cases over a 3-month period. TB-cases showed a rising rate, while EM-cases had elevated rates at both time points. This difference is likely due to timing of the tick bite, with TB-cases having a recent bite and EM-cases developing EM days to weeks post-bite. Both groups had higher sensitisation rates than population controls, corroborating the link between tick bites and α-gal sensitisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":"55 4","pages":"350-353"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cea.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.70011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

α-Gal syndrome (AGS) is an emerging tick-borne disease characterised by the development of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) antibodies against galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal), a carbohydrate found in most mammalian species, but not in humans. AGS occurs in individuals with a history of tick bites. Currently, no data exist on α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, including those with tick bites or erythema migrans (EM). Therefore, this study aimed to determine the rate of α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, to assess α-gal sIgE seroconversion after tick bites, and to determine the relationship between EM and α-gal sIgE in serum. α-Gal sensitisation rates were assessed in individuals with tick bites (TB), EM, and the general population. Blood samples were collected from TB- and EM-cases at baseline and again after 3 months. Single blood samples from controls were selected from a Dutch population survey. In total, 156 TB-cases, 160 EM-cases, and 316 population controls were included. α-Gal sensitisation rates were 1.9% for population controls and 10.3% and 19.1% for TB- and EM-cases at baseline, respectively (cut-off α-gal sIgE:  ≥ 0.10 kUA/L). Rates increased to 17.9% for TB-cases, comparable to the 16.9% for EM-cases 3 months after EM-development. Distinct α-gal sensitisation rates were observed between TB- and EM-cases over a 3-month period. TB-cases showed a rising rate, while EM-cases had elevated rates at both time points. This difference is likely due to timing of the tick bite, with TB-cases having a recent bite and EM-cases developing EM days to weeks post-bite. Both groups had higher sensitisation rates than population controls, corroborating the link between tick bites and α-gal sensitisation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有或没有迁移性红斑的蜱叮咬后个体的α - gal致敏动力学。
α-半乳糖综合征(AGS)是一种新出现的蜱传疾病,其特征是产生针对半乳糖-α-1,3-半乳糖(α-Gal)的特异性免疫球蛋白E (sIgE)抗体,半乳糖-α-1,3-半乳糖(α-Gal)是一种碳水化合物,存在于大多数哺乳动物中,但不存在于人类中。AGS发生在有蜱虫叮咬史的个体中。目前,尚无关于荷兰人群中α-gal sIgE血清阳性率的数据,包括蜱叮咬或迁移性红斑(EM)患者。因此,本研究旨在测定荷兰人群α-gal sIgE的血清阳性率,评估蜱叮咬后α-gal sIgE的血清转化情况,确定EM与血清α-gal sIgE的关系。对蜱叮咬(TB)、EM和普通人群的α-Gal致敏率进行了评估。在基线和3个月后再次采集TB和em病例的血液样本。对照的单血样选自荷兰人口调查。总共包括156例结核病病例、160例em病例和316例人口对照。在基线时,人群对照组α-Gal致敏率为1.9%,TB和em患者分别为10.3%和19.1% (α-Gal sIgE截止值:≥0.10 kUA/L)。结核病病例的发病率增加到17.9%,与em发展3个月后em病例的16.9%相当。在3个月的时间里,观察到结核病和em病例之间不同的α-gal致敏率。结核病例的发病率上升,而em病例的发病率在两个时间点都有所上升。这种差异可能是由于蜱虫叮咬的时间,结核病病例最近被叮咬,而EM病例在叮咬后数天至数周内发生EM。两组的致敏率都高于对照组,证实了蜱叮咬和α-gal致敏之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy of Biologicals for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Food Allergy in India: Delphi Consensus Statement by Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP)-Allergy and Applied Immunology Chapter. New Generation of Allergen Immunotherapy Using Virus-Like Particles: A Comprehensive Review. Prognostic Significance of Eosinophil Extracellular Traps in Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Innovative Nanosheets-Based Clearance Therapy. A Role for Non-Canonical Caspases in Fungal Allergic Airway Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1