Alpha-Gal Sensitization Dynamics in Individuals After Tick Bites With or Without Erythema Migrans.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Clinical and Experimental Allergy Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1111/cea.70011
Tamara van Gorkom, Michiel Heron, Agnetha Hofhuis, Carlijn Jongerius, Fiona R M van der Klis, Hanneke N G Oude Elberink, Hein Sprong, Steven F T Thijsen, Kristin Kremer
{"title":"Alpha-Gal Sensitization Dynamics in Individuals After Tick Bites With or Without Erythema Migrans.","authors":"Tamara van Gorkom, Michiel Heron, Agnetha Hofhuis, Carlijn Jongerius, Fiona R M van der Klis, Hanneke N G Oude Elberink, Hein Sprong, Steven F T Thijsen, Kristin Kremer","doi":"10.1111/cea.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>α-Gal syndrome (AGS) is an emerging tick-borne disease characterised by the development of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) antibodies against galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal), a carbohydrate found in most mammalian species, but not in humans. AGS occurs in individuals with a history of tick bites. Currently, no data exist on α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, including those with tick bites or erythema migrans (EM). Therefore, this study aimed to determine the rate of α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, to assess α-gal sIgE seroconversion after tick bites, and to determine the relationship between EM and α-gal sIgE in serum. α-Gal sensitisation rates were assessed in individuals with tick bites (TB), EM, and the general population. Blood samples were collected from TB- and EM-cases at baseline and again after 3 months. Single blood samples from controls were selected from a Dutch population survey. In total, 156 TB-cases, 160 EM-cases, and 316 population controls were included. α-Gal sensitisation rates were 1.9% for population controls and 10.3% and 19.1% for TB- and EM-cases at baseline, respectively (cut-off α-gal sIgE:  ≥ 0.10 kU<sub>A</sub>/L). Rates increased to 17.9% for TB-cases, comparable to the 16.9% for EM-cases 3 months after EM-development. Distinct α-gal sensitisation rates were observed between TB- and EM-cases over a 3-month period. TB-cases showed a rising rate, while EM-cases had elevated rates at both time points. This difference is likely due to timing of the tick bite, with TB-cases having a recent bite and EM-cases developing EM days to weeks post-bite. Both groups had higher sensitisation rates than population controls, corroborating the link between tick bites and α-gal sensitisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.70011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

α-Gal syndrome (AGS) is an emerging tick-borne disease characterised by the development of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) antibodies against galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal), a carbohydrate found in most mammalian species, but not in humans. AGS occurs in individuals with a history of tick bites. Currently, no data exist on α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, including those with tick bites or erythema migrans (EM). Therefore, this study aimed to determine the rate of α-gal sIgE seroprevalence in the Dutch population, to assess α-gal sIgE seroconversion after tick bites, and to determine the relationship between EM and α-gal sIgE in serum. α-Gal sensitisation rates were assessed in individuals with tick bites (TB), EM, and the general population. Blood samples were collected from TB- and EM-cases at baseline and again after 3 months. Single blood samples from controls were selected from a Dutch population survey. In total, 156 TB-cases, 160 EM-cases, and 316 population controls were included. α-Gal sensitisation rates were 1.9% for population controls and 10.3% and 19.1% for TB- and EM-cases at baseline, respectively (cut-off α-gal sIgE:  ≥ 0.10 kUA/L). Rates increased to 17.9% for TB-cases, comparable to the 16.9% for EM-cases 3 months after EM-development. Distinct α-gal sensitisation rates were observed between TB- and EM-cases over a 3-month period. TB-cases showed a rising rate, while EM-cases had elevated rates at both time points. This difference is likely due to timing of the tick bite, with TB-cases having a recent bite and EM-cases developing EM days to weeks post-bite. Both groups had higher sensitisation rates than population controls, corroborating the link between tick bites and α-gal sensitisation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
期刊最新文献
Alpha-Gal Sensitization Dynamics in Individuals After Tick Bites With or Without Erythema Migrans. Global Trends in Atopic Dermatitis Burden Among Individuals Under 19 Years From 1990 to 2021. Dupilumab-Associated Ocular Surface Disease in Paediatric Atopic Dermatitis Patients: Results From the BioDay Registry. Issue Information Incidence and Prevalence of Childhood Atopic Diseases in Dutch Primary Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1