Anna M Kroninger, BreAnna L Davids, Andrew J Franck
{"title":"Evaluation of Nutrition Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection.","authors":"Anna M Kroninger, BreAnna L Davids, Andrew J Franck","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Nutrition therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a fundamental aspect of care, but there is minimal guidance for patients with CDI despite the potentially severe consequences of this infection on the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to assess nutrition therapy in critically ill patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) compared to those without CDI for differences in nutrition delivery, need for nutrition support, and safety of nutrition therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the ICU from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2022. This study compared nutrition therapy in critically ill patients who had CDI compared to a cohort who had diagnoses of other infections. Outcomes included doses of nutrition prescribed, need for nutrition support, and measures of enteral feeding tolerance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 66 patients were included in this study, 33 in each group. The CDI group received higher median maximum calories (24.3 kcal/kg/day) compared to the control group (21.7 kcal/kg/day) [MD 3.5, 95% CI 0.05-7.49, p = .04] and higher median maximum protein doses (1.1 g/kg/day) to (0.9 g/kg/day) [MD 0.2, 95% CI 0.04-0.38, p = .02]. In the CDI group, significantly more patients required nutrition support (75.8% and 48.5%, respectively) [OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.16-9.84, p = .02], but there was no difference in the number of patients who received parenteral nutrition. Measures of enteral feeding safety and tolerance were similar between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nutrition therapy for critically ill patients did not appear to be negatively impacted by CDI, and provision of diet or enteral nutrition therapy appeared similarly safe and tolerated compared to those without CDI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background & aims: Nutrition therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a fundamental aspect of care, but there is minimal guidance for patients with CDI despite the potentially severe consequences of this infection on the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to assess nutrition therapy in critically ill patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) compared to those without CDI for differences in nutrition delivery, need for nutrition support, and safety of nutrition therapy.
Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the ICU from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2022. This study compared nutrition therapy in critically ill patients who had CDI compared to a cohort who had diagnoses of other infections. Outcomes included doses of nutrition prescribed, need for nutrition support, and measures of enteral feeding tolerance.
Results: A total of 66 patients were included in this study, 33 in each group. The CDI group received higher median maximum calories (24.3 kcal/kg/day) compared to the control group (21.7 kcal/kg/day) [MD 3.5, 95% CI 0.05-7.49, p = .04] and higher median maximum protein doses (1.1 g/kg/day) to (0.9 g/kg/day) [MD 0.2, 95% CI 0.04-0.38, p = .02]. In the CDI group, significantly more patients required nutrition support (75.8% and 48.5%, respectively) [OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.16-9.84, p = .02], but there was no difference in the number of patients who received parenteral nutrition. Measures of enteral feeding safety and tolerance were similar between both groups.
Conclusion: Nutrition therapy for critically ill patients did not appear to be negatively impacted by CDI, and provision of diet or enteral nutrition therapy appeared similarly safe and tolerated compared to those without CDI.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.