Heparin in peripherally inserted central catheters did not alter elective removal and complication rates in preterm infants.

IF 2.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition ESPEN Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.024
Dirk Wackernagel, Vanessa Gavelli, Per Nydert
{"title":"Heparin in peripherally inserted central catheters did not alter elective removal and complication rates in preterm infants.","authors":"Dirk Wackernagel, Vanessa Gavelli, Per Nydert","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>In preterm and sick newborn infants, peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are used for the delivery of concentrated parenteral nutrition and other high risk drugs. Despite the precaution issued by the ESPGHAN 2018, heparin is used in many neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and is thought to extend PICC usability. This study aimed to examine the association of prophylactic heparin with elective PICC removal rates, with complication rates and dwell-times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All PICCs placed at two different Level III NICUs during 2017, were analyzed retrospectively. Out of 168 PICCs, 36 had to be excluded, leaving 132 PICCs for analysis. Prophylactic heparin was used in 90 PICCs (heparin-group) and 42 PICCs without (control group) RESULTS: Sixty-six PICCs (73%) vs 30 (71%) could be removed electively in the heparin-group (adjusted Odds Ratio 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 [0.31, 2.89], p>0.9). Complications occurred in 17 (19%) and 8 (19%) PICCs in the heparin-group and control-group, respectively. Dwell-times did not differ significantly with median 10 days (Interquartile range (IQR) 6,17) in the heparin-group and 8 days (IQR 7,12) in the control-group with an adjusted hazard ratio 0.70 (95% CI [0.45, 1.09], p=0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our retrospective analysis, adding heparin to admixtures infused via PICCs did not alter the odds of elective removals or complication rates. Furthermore, Dwell-times did not differ significantly between the two groups. In line with the ESPGHAN recommendations, our data can not support the use of heparin to improve PICC usability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: In preterm and sick newborn infants, peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are used for the delivery of concentrated parenteral nutrition and other high risk drugs. Despite the precaution issued by the ESPGHAN 2018, heparin is used in many neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and is thought to extend PICC usability. This study aimed to examine the association of prophylactic heparin with elective PICC removal rates, with complication rates and dwell-times.

Methods: All PICCs placed at two different Level III NICUs during 2017, were analyzed retrospectively. Out of 168 PICCs, 36 had to be excluded, leaving 132 PICCs for analysis. Prophylactic heparin was used in 90 PICCs (heparin-group) and 42 PICCs without (control group) RESULTS: Sixty-six PICCs (73%) vs 30 (71%) could be removed electively in the heparin-group (adjusted Odds Ratio 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 [0.31, 2.89], p>0.9). Complications occurred in 17 (19%) and 8 (19%) PICCs in the heparin-group and control-group, respectively. Dwell-times did not differ significantly with median 10 days (Interquartile range (IQR) 6,17) in the heparin-group and 8 days (IQR 7,12) in the control-group with an adjusted hazard ratio 0.70 (95% CI [0.45, 1.09], p=0.11).

Conclusion: In our retrospective analysis, adding heparin to admixtures infused via PICCs did not alter the odds of elective removals or complication rates. Furthermore, Dwell-times did not differ significantly between the two groups. In line with the ESPGHAN recommendations, our data can not support the use of heparin to improve PICC usability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Total, unprocessed, and processed red meat intake in relation to the risk of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Exploring the Role of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Status in Body Composition and Nutritional Features in Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer. Heparin in peripherally inserted central catheters did not alter elective removal and complication rates in preterm infants. Effects of bariatric surgeries on Binge eating disorders, Food addiction, and eating behaviors: A comprehensive systematic review of RCTs. High-density enteral formula in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1