Inaction Despite Motivation: Assessing Systemic and Personal Barriers to Pediatricians' Post-Dobbs Emergency Contraception Utilization.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jpag.2025.03.006
Elizabeth Hovel, Michelle Pickett, Alexis Visotcky, Kelsey Porada, Wendi Ehrman, Margaret Thew, Vanessa McFadden
{"title":"Inaction Despite Motivation: Assessing Systemic and Personal Barriers to Pediatricians' Post-Dobbs Emergency Contraception Utilization.","authors":"Elizabeth Hovel, Michelle Pickett, Alexis Visotcky, Kelsey Porada, Wendi Ehrman, Margaret Thew, Vanessa McFadden","doi":"10.1016/j.jpag.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Following the US Supreme Court's Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health (Dobbs) decision and subsequent changes to abortion access, increasing emergency contraception (EC) access for adolescents is vital. The first step is understanding providers' knowledge, attitude and practices regarding EC post-Dobbs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional internet-based survey was sent to providers within three general pediatric primary care systems from November 2023 to January 2024. Questions addressed EC knowledge, attitudes (perceived barriers and desired support to increase EC prescription) and practices post-Dobbs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 51 participants. Most (81%) providers felt adolescent EC prescription was more important post-Dobbs, but very few (7%) had changed their own prescribing practices. Overall, providers had a mean knowledge score of 71%. Providers closer to training had a higher EC knowledge score (77% vs 68%, p = 0.02), as did providers who were generally willing to provide EC (72% vs 58%, p=0.004). Providers in urban and rural areas were more likely to have prescribed EC than suburban counterparts (54% urban, 40% rural, 16% suburban, p = 0.04). Various barriers were elicited, most commonly relating to lack of awareness and knowledge about EC. Over half of respondents noted they would be more likely to prescribe EC with clinical decision support built into the EMR (69%), an order set in the electronic medical record (57%), and education sessions (55%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights a strong need to bolster provider EC education in pediatrics and address systems factors that will facilitate easier, more confident EC prescription.</p>","PeriodicalId":16708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2025.03.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Following the US Supreme Court's Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health (Dobbs) decision and subsequent changes to abortion access, increasing emergency contraception (EC) access for adolescents is vital. The first step is understanding providers' knowledge, attitude and practices regarding EC post-Dobbs.

Methods: This cross-sectional internet-based survey was sent to providers within three general pediatric primary care systems from November 2023 to January 2024. Questions addressed EC knowledge, attitudes (perceived barriers and desired support to increase EC prescription) and practices post-Dobbs.

Results: There were 51 participants. Most (81%) providers felt adolescent EC prescription was more important post-Dobbs, but very few (7%) had changed their own prescribing practices. Overall, providers had a mean knowledge score of 71%. Providers closer to training had a higher EC knowledge score (77% vs 68%, p = 0.02), as did providers who were generally willing to provide EC (72% vs 58%, p=0.004). Providers in urban and rural areas were more likely to have prescribed EC than suburban counterparts (54% urban, 40% rural, 16% suburban, p = 0.04). Various barriers were elicited, most commonly relating to lack of awareness and knowledge about EC. Over half of respondents noted they would be more likely to prescribe EC with clinical decision support built into the EMR (69%), an order set in the electronic medical record (57%), and education sessions (55%).

Discussion: This study highlights a strong need to bolster provider EC education in pediatrics and address systems factors that will facilitate easier, more confident EC prescription.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
251
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology includes all aspects of clinical and basic science research in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. The Journal draws on expertise from a variety of disciplines including pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, reproduction and gynecology, reproductive and pediatric endocrinology, genetics, and molecular biology. The Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology features original studies, review articles, book and literature reviews, letters to the editor, and communications in brief. It is an essential resource for the libraries of OB/GYN specialists, as well as pediatricians and primary care physicians.
期刊最新文献
Inaction Despite Motivation: Assessing Systemic and Personal Barriers to Pediatricians' Post-Dobbs Emergency Contraception Utilization. Effect of Transdermal Estrogen Therapy on Bone and Neurobehavioral Health in Youth with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: A Case-Control Study. EFFECTS OF COMBINED HORMONAL CONTRACEPTIVES (CHC) ON BONE HEALTH IN ADOLESCENT GIRLS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Maternal factors during pregnancy and pubertal timing in offspring: A systematic review of the literature. Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1