Effects of DLP printing orientation and postprocessing regimes on the properties of 3D printed denture bases

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.035
Dana Jafarpour DMD , Nesma El-Amier DMD, MSc , Kawkab Tahboub DMD, MSc , Elizabeth Zimmermann PhD , Ana Carolina Pero DMD, MSc, PhD , Raphael de Souza DMD, MSc, PhD
{"title":"Effects of DLP printing orientation and postprocessing regimes on the properties of 3D printed denture bases","authors":"Dana Jafarpour DMD ,&nbsp;Nesma El-Amier DMD, MSc ,&nbsp;Kawkab Tahboub DMD, MSc ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Zimmermann PhD ,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Pero DMD, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Raphael de Souza DMD, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>The variety of recommended postprocessing techniques and printing parameters makes it challenging to determine the best approach to 3-dimensionally (3D) printed dentures.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of printing orientations (0, 45, and 90 degrees) and postprocessing treatments (ultraviolet [UV], heat, or combination) on the mechanical and surface properties of 3D printed denture base resin.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Three-dimensionally printed denture base resin specimens were fabricated at 0-, 45-, and 90-degree printing orientations, followed by 4 postprocessing techniques (UV, Heat, UV+Heat, and control). Microhardness was assessed using a Vickers microhardness tester. Additionally, the flexural strength (FS) and modulus of elasticity (MoE) were analyzed using a 3-point bend test. Wettability was measured according to the sessile drop test. The fractured surfaces were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>FS was significantly greater (<em>P</em>&lt;.001) at a print orientation of 90 degrees (73.7 MPa) compared with 0 and 45 degrees (55.2 and 61.8 MPa). No significant difference in FS was found among postprocessing treatments (all complied with the International Organization for Standardization [ISO] requirements). The UV group had the highest MoE (up to 2061 MPa), followed by the heat-treated groups (up to 1412 MPa). The 45-degree print orientation showed the highest contact angle (CA) in almost all groups (CA=117.6±11.7), and UV led to higher hydrophilicity (CA=33.9±12.0). The effect of build orientation on the microhardness depended on the postprocessing technique with the highest value (23.4 ±1.3) achieved by UV postprocessing in combination with the 90-degree orientation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The optimal FS of 3D printed denture base resin is achieved when it is printed in a vertical orientation (90 degrees relative to the platform base). Thermal annealing as a postprocessing technique combined with UV can effectively enhance FS, induce favorable wettability, and reduce stiffness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"134 1","pages":"Pages 239.e1-239.e9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391325001866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

The variety of recommended postprocessing techniques and printing parameters makes it challenging to determine the best approach to 3-dimensionally (3D) printed dentures.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of printing orientations (0, 45, and 90 degrees) and postprocessing treatments (ultraviolet [UV], heat, or combination) on the mechanical and surface properties of 3D printed denture base resin.

Material and methods

Three-dimensionally printed denture base resin specimens were fabricated at 0-, 45-, and 90-degree printing orientations, followed by 4 postprocessing techniques (UV, Heat, UV+Heat, and control). Microhardness was assessed using a Vickers microhardness tester. Additionally, the flexural strength (FS) and modulus of elasticity (MoE) were analyzed using a 3-point bend test. Wettability was measured according to the sessile drop test. The fractured surfaces were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Results

FS was significantly greater (P<.001) at a print orientation of 90 degrees (73.7 MPa) compared with 0 and 45 degrees (55.2 and 61.8 MPa). No significant difference in FS was found among postprocessing treatments (all complied with the International Organization for Standardization [ISO] requirements). The UV group had the highest MoE (up to 2061 MPa), followed by the heat-treated groups (up to 1412 MPa). The 45-degree print orientation showed the highest contact angle (CA) in almost all groups (CA=117.6±11.7), and UV led to higher hydrophilicity (CA=33.9±12.0). The effect of build orientation on the microhardness depended on the postprocessing technique with the highest value (23.4 ±1.3) achieved by UV postprocessing in combination with the 90-degree orientation.

Conclusions

The optimal FS of 3D printed denture base resin is achieved when it is printed in a vertical orientation (90 degrees relative to the platform base). Thermal annealing as a postprocessing technique combined with UV can effectively enhance FS, induce favorable wettability, and reduce stiffness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DLP打印方向和后处理制度对3D打印义齿基托性能的影响。
问题陈述:各种推荐的后处理技术和打印参数使得确定三维(3D)打印假牙的最佳方法具有挑战性。目的:本体外研究的目的是评估打印方向(0度、45度和90度)和后处理(紫外线、加热或组合)对3D打印义齿基托树脂机械性能和表面性能的影响。材料与方法:采用0°、45°和90°打印方向制作三维打印义齿基托树脂样品,并进行UV、Heat、UV+Heat和control 4种后处理技术。显微硬度用维氏显微硬度计测定。此外,使用三点弯曲试验分析了抗弯强度(FS)和弹性模量(MoE)。根据不间断跌落试验测定润湿性。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下观察断裂表面。结论:3D打印义齿基托树脂以垂直方向(相对于平台基托90度)打印时获得最佳的FS。热处理作为后处理技术与UV相结合,可以有效地提高FS,诱导良好的润湿性,降低刚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Response to Letter to the Editor on the Manuscript, "Comparing the performance of ChatGPT 4o, DeepSeek R1, and Gemini 2 Pro in answering fixed prosthodontics questions over time". Effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength between light-polymerized hard chairside relining material and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled denture base materials. Level of research and scientific interest in immediate dentin sealing: A global bibliometric network analysis. Letter to the Editor regarding, "Comparing the performance of ChatGPT 4o, DeepSeek R1, and Gemini 2 Pro in answering fixed prosthodontics questions over time" by Shirani. Evaluating point cloud density, surface topography, and accuracy across six extraoral scanners: A correlational and 3-dimensional (3D) comparative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1