Dermal wipe sampling method development and validation for semivolatile and nonvolatile flame-retardant compounds TBBPA and TPP for use in occupational exposure assessments.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1080/15459624.2025.2473464
L Gloekler, O Jappen, J Reynolds, S Thornton, J Sanders, A Maier, H Lynch
{"title":"Dermal wipe sampling method development and validation for semivolatile and nonvolatile flame-retardant compounds TBBPA and TPP for use in occupational exposure assessments.","authors":"L Gloekler, O Jappen, J Reynolds, S Thornton, J Sanders, A Maier, H Lynch","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2025.2473464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurately estimating exposure is critical to assessing the potential health risks of chemicals. Characterizing dermal exposures to semivolatile or nonvolatile compounds in occupational studies can be challenging because of a lack of standardized procedures for dermal wipe sample collection and methods for sample analysis for most industrial chemicals, especially organic compounds. Methodologies are sometimes available in the scientific literature; however, the approaches vary, typically have not been validated, and may not be suitable for application in commercial laboratory settings. This article describes the laboratory development and validation of a method to identify and quantify the semivolatile organic compounds, tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA, CAS: 79-94-7) and triphenyl phosphate (TPP, CAS: 115-86-6) in dermal wipe samples and to validate recovery of these chemicals from porcine skin. The analytical method involved extraction of the test compounds on two different wipe media (cotton and polyester-rayon blend) in 100% isopropanol using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results indicate that polyester-rayon wipes were preferable to cotton wipes. Additionally, the dermal wipe sampling method was tested and validated using porcine skin as a surrogate for human skin. This study provides a framework to perform validation of analytical and dermal sample collection methods for other semivolatile and nonvolatile chemicals and provides a baseline method for the development of commercial laboratory methods to evaluate exposure to other chemicals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2473464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately estimating exposure is critical to assessing the potential health risks of chemicals. Characterizing dermal exposures to semivolatile or nonvolatile compounds in occupational studies can be challenging because of a lack of standardized procedures for dermal wipe sample collection and methods for sample analysis for most industrial chemicals, especially organic compounds. Methodologies are sometimes available in the scientific literature; however, the approaches vary, typically have not been validated, and may not be suitable for application in commercial laboratory settings. This article describes the laboratory development and validation of a method to identify and quantify the semivolatile organic compounds, tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA, CAS: 79-94-7) and triphenyl phosphate (TPP, CAS: 115-86-6) in dermal wipe samples and to validate recovery of these chemicals from porcine skin. The analytical method involved extraction of the test compounds on two different wipe media (cotton and polyester-rayon blend) in 100% isopropanol using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results indicate that polyester-rayon wipes were preferable to cotton wipes. Additionally, the dermal wipe sampling method was tested and validated using porcine skin as a surrogate for human skin. This study provides a framework to perform validation of analytical and dermal sample collection methods for other semivolatile and nonvolatile chemicals and provides a baseline method for the development of commercial laboratory methods to evaluate exposure to other chemicals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ( JOEH ) is a joint publication of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®) and ACGIH®. The JOEH is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to enhancing the knowledge and practice of occupational and environmental hygiene and safety by widely disseminating research articles and applied studies of the highest quality. The JOEH provides a written medium for the communication of ideas, methods, processes, and research in core and emerging areas of occupational and environmental hygiene. Core domains include, but are not limited to: exposure assessment, control strategies, ergonomics, and risk analysis. Emerging domains include, but are not limited to: sensor technology, emergency preparedness and response, changing workforce, and management and analysis of "big" data.
期刊最新文献
Perspective on occupational health and safety of sterilization unit employees and unit safety. Dermal wipe sampling method development and validation for semivolatile and nonvolatile flame-retardant compounds TBBPA and TPP for use in occupational exposure assessments. Exploring aerosol-specific calibration and performance of three direct-reading photometers. Toward rapid silica analysis of CPDM samples: A study of dust recovery and quartz estimation using lab and field samples. A comparison of the ventilatory responses to wearing either a hood or a mask escape respirator with identical nose-cups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1