Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia.

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY Open Life Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/biol-2022-1048
Hong-Bo Chen, Jie Liu, Yu Zhang, Hao Huang, Li-Na Wang
{"title":"Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia.","authors":"Hong-Bo Chen, Jie Liu, Yu Zhang, Hao Huang, Li-Na Wang","doi":"10.1515/biol-2022-1048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the clinical utility and optimal timing of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The study included 50 hospitalized patients diagnosed with diabetes complicated by CAP who underwent conventional microbiological testing (CMT) and mNGS using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Among the 50 cases, 16% presented no respiratory symptoms. There were significant increases in inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6, with patchy imaging changes being the most prevalent. The positive rates for pathogen detection by mNGS and CMTs were 78 and 21% (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mNGS was significantly better than the CMTs in the detection of rare pathogens such as <i>Anaerobes</i>, <i>Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium bovis, Aspergillus fumigatus</i>, and <i>Pneumocystis japonicus</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). After clinical interpretation, 85% (22/26) of viruses, 24% (9/37) of bacteria, and 25% (2/8) of fungi were non-pathogen organisms by mNGS. There was a significant difference in the rates of adjustment in anti-infection treatment strategies based on the pathogen detection results from CMTs and mNGS, which were 2 and 46%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). We found that mNGS was superior to CMTs in terms of the positive rate of pathogen detection, detecting mixed infection incidence, rare pathogen detection rates, and the adjustment of treatment strategies. However, mNGS results need to be interpreted in the context of the clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":19605,"journal":{"name":"Open Life Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":"20221048"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-1048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the clinical utility and optimal timing of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The study included 50 hospitalized patients diagnosed with diabetes complicated by CAP who underwent conventional microbiological testing (CMT) and mNGS using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Among the 50 cases, 16% presented no respiratory symptoms. There were significant increases in inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6, with patchy imaging changes being the most prevalent. The positive rates for pathogen detection by mNGS and CMTs were 78 and 21% (P < 0.05). The mNGS was significantly better than the CMTs in the detection of rare pathogens such as Anaerobes, Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium bovis, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Pneumocystis japonicus (P < 0.05). After clinical interpretation, 85% (22/26) of viruses, 24% (9/37) of bacteria, and 25% (2/8) of fungi were non-pathogen organisms by mNGS. There was a significant difference in the rates of adjustment in anti-infection treatment strategies based on the pathogen detection results from CMTs and mNGS, which were 2 and 46%, respectively (P < 0.05). We found that mNGS was superior to CMTs in terms of the positive rate of pathogen detection, detecting mixed infection incidence, rare pathogen detection rates, and the adjustment of treatment strategies. However, mNGS results need to be interpreted in the context of the clinic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
131
审稿时长
43 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Life Sciences (previously Central European Journal of Biology) is a fast growing peer-reviewed journal, devoted to scholarly research in all areas of life sciences, such as molecular biology, plant science, biotechnology, cell biology, biochemistry, biophysics, microbiology and virology, ecology, differentiation and development, genetics and many others. Open Life Sciences assures top quality of published data through critical peer review and editorial involvement throughout the whole publication process. Thanks to the Open Access model of publishing, it also offers unrestricted access to published articles for all users.
期刊最新文献
Impact of hyaluronic acid-modified hafnium metalorganic frameworks containing rhynchophylline on Alzheimer's disease. NAT10 promotes radiotherapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer by regulating KPNB1-mediated PD-L1 nuclear translocation. The complete mitochondrial genome analysis of Haemaphysalis hystricis Supino, 1897 (Ixodida: Ixodidae) and its phylogenetic implications. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia. Short-chain fatty acid attenuates intestinal inflammation by regulation of gut microbial composition in antibiotic-associated diarrhea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1