Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia.
Hong-Bo Chen, Jie Liu, Yu Zhang, Hao Huang, Li-Na Wang
{"title":"Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia.","authors":"Hong-Bo Chen, Jie Liu, Yu Zhang, Hao Huang, Li-Na Wang","doi":"10.1515/biol-2022-1048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the clinical utility and optimal timing of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The study included 50 hospitalized patients diagnosed with diabetes complicated by CAP who underwent conventional microbiological testing (CMT) and mNGS using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Among the 50 cases, 16% presented no respiratory symptoms. There were significant increases in inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6, with patchy imaging changes being the most prevalent. The positive rates for pathogen detection by mNGS and CMTs were 78 and 21% (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mNGS was significantly better than the CMTs in the detection of rare pathogens such as <i>Anaerobes</i>, <i>Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium bovis, Aspergillus fumigatus</i>, and <i>Pneumocystis japonicus</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). After clinical interpretation, 85% (22/26) of viruses, 24% (9/37) of bacteria, and 25% (2/8) of fungi were non-pathogen organisms by mNGS. There was a significant difference in the rates of adjustment in anti-infection treatment strategies based on the pathogen detection results from CMTs and mNGS, which were 2 and 46%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). We found that mNGS was superior to CMTs in terms of the positive rate of pathogen detection, detecting mixed infection incidence, rare pathogen detection rates, and the adjustment of treatment strategies. However, mNGS results need to be interpreted in the context of the clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":19605,"journal":{"name":"Open Life Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":"20221048"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-1048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To explore the clinical utility and optimal timing of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The study included 50 hospitalized patients diagnosed with diabetes complicated by CAP who underwent conventional microbiological testing (CMT) and mNGS using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Among the 50 cases, 16% presented no respiratory symptoms. There were significant increases in inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6, with patchy imaging changes being the most prevalent. The positive rates for pathogen detection by mNGS and CMTs were 78 and 21% (P < 0.05). The mNGS was significantly better than the CMTs in the detection of rare pathogens such as Anaerobes, Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium bovis, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Pneumocystis japonicus (P < 0.05). After clinical interpretation, 85% (22/26) of viruses, 24% (9/37) of bacteria, and 25% (2/8) of fungi were non-pathogen organisms by mNGS. There was a significant difference in the rates of adjustment in anti-infection treatment strategies based on the pathogen detection results from CMTs and mNGS, which were 2 and 46%, respectively (P < 0.05). We found that mNGS was superior to CMTs in terms of the positive rate of pathogen detection, detecting mixed infection incidence, rare pathogen detection rates, and the adjustment of treatment strategies. However, mNGS results need to be interpreted in the context of the clinic.
期刊介绍:
Open Life Sciences (previously Central European Journal of Biology) is a fast growing peer-reviewed journal, devoted to scholarly research in all areas of life sciences, such as molecular biology, plant science, biotechnology, cell biology, biochemistry, biophysics, microbiology and virology, ecology, differentiation and development, genetics and many others. Open Life Sciences assures top quality of published data through critical peer review and editorial involvement throughout the whole publication process. Thanks to the Open Access model of publishing, it also offers unrestricted access to published articles for all users.