The apnea interval: Ventilation interruption during tracheal intubation and its association with cardiac arrest resuscitation care and outcome

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110588
David L. Murphy , Julia A. King , Jennifer Blackwood , Heemun Kwok , Sam R. Sharar , Andrew J. Latimer , Peter J. Kudenchuk , Nicholas J. Johnson , Thomas D. Rea
{"title":"The apnea interval: Ventilation interruption during tracheal intubation and its association with cardiac arrest resuscitation care and outcome","authors":"David L. Murphy ,&nbsp;Julia A. King ,&nbsp;Jennifer Blackwood ,&nbsp;Heemun Kwok ,&nbsp;Sam R. Sharar ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Latimer ,&nbsp;Peter J. Kudenchuk ,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Johnson ,&nbsp;Thomas D. Rea","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Guidelines for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation recommend advanced airway management without interrupting chest compressions. However, the extent and impact of interrupting <em>ventilation</em> is unknown. We described the apnea interval that occurs during tracheal intubation and its association with clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cohort investigation of adult ventricular fibrillation (VF) OHCA patients who underwent attempted tracheal intubation prior to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in a metropolitan EMS system (2017–2020). Apnea interval was defined as elapsed time between last breath delivered before and first breath delivered following tracheal intubation attempt. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the relationship between apnea interval (≤60 s vs &gt; 60 s) and outcomes: ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, and favorable neurologic survival (CPC 1–2).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 254 patients, median age was 65 years, 18% were female, and 98% had tracheal intubation success. Overall, 151 (59%) achieved ROSC, 71 (28%) survived to discharge, and 67 (26%) with favorable survival. The median apnea interval during attempted tracheal intubation was 84 s (64–113 s). Median chest compression fraction was 85% overall and 87% during the apnea interval. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, a shorter apnea interval was associated with better outcomes: ROSC (72% vs 56%), survival (39% vs 25%), and favorable survival (39% vs 23%) (p &lt; 0.05 for each comparison).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this VF-OHCA cohort, shorter apnea intervals (≤60 s) were associated with greater likelihood of favorable outcomes. Given its variability and relationship to outcomes, the apnea interval may be a modifiable measure to improve OHCA survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 110588"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957225001005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Guidelines for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation recommend advanced airway management without interrupting chest compressions. However, the extent and impact of interrupting ventilation is unknown. We described the apnea interval that occurs during tracheal intubation and its association with clinical outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a cohort investigation of adult ventricular fibrillation (VF) OHCA patients who underwent attempted tracheal intubation prior to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in a metropolitan EMS system (2017–2020). Apnea interval was defined as elapsed time between last breath delivered before and first breath delivered following tracheal intubation attempt. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the relationship between apnea interval (≤60 s vs > 60 s) and outcomes: ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, and favorable neurologic survival (CPC 1–2).

Results

Among 254 patients, median age was 65 years, 18% were female, and 98% had tracheal intubation success. Overall, 151 (59%) achieved ROSC, 71 (28%) survived to discharge, and 67 (26%) with favorable survival. The median apnea interval during attempted tracheal intubation was 84 s (64–113 s). Median chest compression fraction was 85% overall and 87% during the apnea interval. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, a shorter apnea interval was associated with better outcomes: ROSC (72% vs 56%), survival (39% vs 25%), and favorable survival (39% vs 23%) (p < 0.05 for each comparison).

Conclusions

In this VF-OHCA cohort, shorter apnea intervals (≤60 s) were associated with greater likelihood of favorable outcomes. Given its variability and relationship to outcomes, the apnea interval may be a modifiable measure to improve OHCA survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸暂停间期:气管插管期间通气中断及其与心脏骤停复苏护理和结果的关系。
背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)复苏指南推荐不中断胸外按压的先进气道管理。然而,中断通气的程度和影响尚不清楚。我们描述了气管插管期间发生的呼吸暂停间隔及其与临床结果的关系。方法:我们对2017-2020年在大都市EMS系统中进行了一项成人心室颤动(VF) OHCA患者的队列调查,这些患者在自然循环恢复(ROSC)之前接受了气管插管。呼吸暂停间隔定义为气管插管尝试前最后一次呼吸与第一次呼吸之间的时间。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定呼吸暂停间隔(≤60s vs bbb60 60s)与预后的关系:ROSC、生存至出院,以及良好的神经系统生存(CPC 1-2)。结果:254例患者中位年龄65岁,女性18%,气管插管成功率98%。总体而言,151例(59%)达到ROSC, 71例(28%)存活至出院,67例(26%)生存良好。气管插管中位呼吸暂停时间为84秒(64-113秒)。中位胸压分数总体为85%,呼吸暂停期间为87%。在未调整和调整的分析中,较短的呼吸暂停间隔与更好的结果相关:ROSC(72%对56%)、生存率(39%对25%)和有利生存率(39%对23%)(p结论:在这个VF-OHCA队列中,较短的呼吸暂停间隔(≤60秒)与更大的有利结果可能性相关。鉴于其可变性和与预后的关系,呼吸暂停间隔可能是改善OHCA生存率的可修改措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Duration of emergency medical services-initiated prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts and survival for pediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Machine Learning in cardiac arrest: from Artificial Intelligence, Value-Based Healthcare, to prevention “Corrigendum to “Intraosseous and intravenous vascular access during adult cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Resuscitation 207 (2025) 110481] The Long Shadow of Frailty: Why One-Year Survival Starts before ICU Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests caught on camera: what happens next?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1