Christel R Schopfer, Franziska Grözinger, Barbara Birk, Nicola J Hewitt, Lennart Weltje, Maike Habekost
{"title":"Cross-taxa Extrapolation: Is There a Role for Thyroid Hormone Conjugating Liver Enzymes during Amphibian Metamorphosis?","authors":"Christel R Schopfer, Franziska Grözinger, Barbara Birk, Nicola J Hewitt, Lennart Weltje, Maike Habekost","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemical safety assessment includes evaluating the potential to disrupt the endocrine system in humans and wildlife. The thyroid hormone system shows high complexity which is conserved across vertebrates, allowing biological read-across between regulatory important taxa, namely mammals and amphibians. Potential thyroid disruption in aquatic vertebrates is typically investigated by activity assays (Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay (AMA), Xenopus Eleutheroembryo Thyroid Assay). Since neither assay is designed to provide detailed mechanistic information, mode of action analyses often rely on mammalian data, assuming overall cross-vertebrate conservation. This manuscript elaborates on the imperative that, despite overall conservation, the T-modality in metamorphosing amphibians needs to be understood in detail to justify biological read-across between mammals and amphibians. To this end, we revisit the AMA regarding amphibian developmental physiology, and the T-modality regarding mechanistic cross-vertebrate conservation. The importance of a mechanistic understanding for read-across is showcased based on the AMA's apparent insensitivity to at least one category of prototypical liver enzyme inducers. From a regulatory perspective, deeper mechanistic understanding is needed, not only to strengthen the scientific basis for designing testing strategies and interpreting study results, but also to allow the identification of data gaps and thus development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to minimize vertebrate testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105810"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105810","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chemical safety assessment includes evaluating the potential to disrupt the endocrine system in humans and wildlife. The thyroid hormone system shows high complexity which is conserved across vertebrates, allowing biological read-across between regulatory important taxa, namely mammals and amphibians. Potential thyroid disruption in aquatic vertebrates is typically investigated by activity assays (Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay (AMA), Xenopus Eleutheroembryo Thyroid Assay). Since neither assay is designed to provide detailed mechanistic information, mode of action analyses often rely on mammalian data, assuming overall cross-vertebrate conservation. This manuscript elaborates on the imperative that, despite overall conservation, the T-modality in metamorphosing amphibians needs to be understood in detail to justify biological read-across between mammals and amphibians. To this end, we revisit the AMA regarding amphibian developmental physiology, and the T-modality regarding mechanistic cross-vertebrate conservation. The importance of a mechanistic understanding for read-across is showcased based on the AMA's apparent insensitivity to at least one category of prototypical liver enzyme inducers. From a regulatory perspective, deeper mechanistic understanding is needed, not only to strengthen the scientific basis for designing testing strategies and interpreting study results, but also to allow the identification of data gaps and thus development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to minimize vertebrate testing.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)