Effects of aerobic cycling training in patients with gynaecologic cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema: A randomised comparative study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09354-4
Onur Kara, Gül Mete Civelek, Cansu Şahbaz Pirinççi, Rabia Tarlabölen, Meltem Dalyan
{"title":"Effects of aerobic cycling training in patients with gynaecologic cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema: A randomised comparative study.","authors":"Onur Kara, Gül Mete Civelek, Cansu Şahbaz Pirinççi, Rabia Tarlabölen, Meltem Dalyan","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09354-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) after gynaecological cancer is a chronic disease that affects quality of life and functionality negatively. Exercise therapies help to volume reduction and improved lower extremity functionality and quality of life in patients with lymphedema. However, studies on this subject were mostly focused on upper extremity lymphedema. In this study, we aimed to compare complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and CDT + cycle ergometry in terms of quality of life, lower extremity functionality and volume measurement in patients with gynaecological cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 63 patients who gave written and verbal informed consent. The participants were randomly divided into two groups as cycling (32 patients) and non-cycling group (31 patients). Demographic and clinical data of patients were recorded. While patients in non-cycling group were treated with only CDT for 3 weeks, patients in cycling group were treated with CDT + cycle ergometry for 3 weeks. Cycle ergometry treatment was performed with Voit AT-200 Black Collection horizontal bike for 20 min. Exercise intensity was adjusted to 40-59% of heart rate reserve (HRR). Volume measurement was evaluated by circumference measurement method, quality of life was evaluated by Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (LYMQOL) and lower extremity functionality was evaluated by Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) in all participants.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Both cycling group and non-cycling group benefited from treatments in terms of volume reduction, LEFS and LYMQOL (function, appearance, symptom, mood and overall quality of life) values (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In comparison of cycling and non-cycling groups, significant differences were found in favor of cycling group in terms of delta (Δ) extremity volume values (ml), Δ LEFS, Δ LYMQOL (function, appearance, symptom, mood and overall quality of life) (p = 0.04, p = 0.03, p < 0.001, p = 0.04, p = 0.002, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). In other words; both groups benefited from treatments in terms of volume reduction, functionality and quality of life. However, benefit of cycling group is greater than benefit of non-cycling group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aerobic exercise added to CDT in gynaecological cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema is effective in terms of volume reduction, improved lower extremity functionality and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06200948 .</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 4","pages":"302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09354-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) after gynaecological cancer is a chronic disease that affects quality of life and functionality negatively. Exercise therapies help to volume reduction and improved lower extremity functionality and quality of life in patients with lymphedema. However, studies on this subject were mostly focused on upper extremity lymphedema. In this study, we aimed to compare complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and CDT + cycle ergometry in terms of quality of life, lower extremity functionality and volume measurement in patients with gynaecological cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema.

Methods: This study included 63 patients who gave written and verbal informed consent. The participants were randomly divided into two groups as cycling (32 patients) and non-cycling group (31 patients). Demographic and clinical data of patients were recorded. While patients in non-cycling group were treated with only CDT for 3 weeks, patients in cycling group were treated with CDT + cycle ergometry for 3 weeks. Cycle ergometry treatment was performed with Voit AT-200 Black Collection horizontal bike for 20 min. Exercise intensity was adjusted to 40-59% of heart rate reserve (HRR). Volume measurement was evaluated by circumference measurement method, quality of life was evaluated by Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (LYMQOL) and lower extremity functionality was evaluated by Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) in all participants.

Result: Both cycling group and non-cycling group benefited from treatments in terms of volume reduction, LEFS and LYMQOL (function, appearance, symptom, mood and overall quality of life) values (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In comparison of cycling and non-cycling groups, significant differences were found in favor of cycling group in terms of delta (Δ) extremity volume values (ml), Δ LEFS, Δ LYMQOL (function, appearance, symptom, mood and overall quality of life) (p = 0.04, p = 0.03, p < 0.001, p = 0.04, p = 0.002, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). In other words; both groups benefited from treatments in terms of volume reduction, functionality and quality of life. However, benefit of cycling group is greater than benefit of non-cycling group.

Conclusion: Aerobic exercise added to CDT in gynaecological cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema is effective in terms of volume reduction, improved lower extremity functionality and quality of life.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06200948 .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Assessment and monitoring by Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale: an observational study on cancer patients at home. Body weight change in a medical supplement group in patients with early breast cancer during chemotherapy: a randomized, controlled trial. Effects of aerobic cycling training in patients with gynaecologic cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema: A randomised comparative study. Identification of distinct fatigue trajectories in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy: an observational longitudinal study. When tomorrow starts without me.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1