[Early differential diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and acute myocarditis in young patients].

J Huang, X Y Zhu, C Tang, H Li, Y N Wu, C P Zhang, J Zhu
{"title":"[Early differential diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and acute myocarditis in young patients].","authors":"J Huang, X Y Zhu, C Tang, H Li, Y N Wu, C P Zhang, J Zhu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240924-00770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the value of general information and rapid laboratory tests obtained from the emergency department in the early diagnosis and prevention of young patients with acute myocardial infarction and acute myocarditis, in order to prevent the disease from progressing to a critical stage. This study employs a retrospective observational study, compiling clinical data from young patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction or acute myocarditis who were admitted to the Department of Cardiology or Emergency Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2015 to September 2024. Demographic information and laboratory test results from both the outpatient and emergency departments were retrieved. The acute myocardial infarction group comprised 267 patients (257 males, 10 females) aged 23-44 ys, while the acute myocarditis group included 134 patients (93 males, 41 females) aged 18-44 ys. A comparative analysis of the clinical data between the two groups was conducted, encompassing variables such as age, gender, comorbidities, high-risk factors, emergency blood routine tests, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, coagulation profiles, renal function tests, NT-proBNP levels, myocardial injury markers, electrocardiogram readings, blood pressure, and heart rate. The results showed that:Compared with the young myocarditis group, the myocardial infarction group was older (ys)[38(35, 42) <i>vs</i> 30(25, 37), <i>U</i>=7 893, <i>P</i><0.001], more male [257(96.3%) <i>vs</i> 93(69.4%), <i>χ</i>²=57.95, <i>P</i><0.001], more smoking [211(79.0%)<i>vs</i> 38(28.4%), <i>χ</i>²=97.32, <i>P</i><0.001], drinking history [125(46.8%) <i>vs</i> 22(16.4%), <i>χ</i>²=35.51, <i>P</i><0.001], family history of coronary heart disease [45(16.9%) <i>vs</i> 3(2.2%), <i>χ</i>²=18.09, <i>P</i><0.001], hypertension [100(37.5%) <i>vs</i> 12(9.0%), <i>χ</i>²=36, <i>P</i><0.001] and diabetes [42(15.7%) <i>vs</i> 4(3.0%), <i>χ</i>²=14.27, <i>P</i><0.001]. Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)[126(114, 144) <i>vs</i> 119(101, 126), <i>U</i>=11 389.50, <i>P</i><0.001], diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)[80(70, 93) <i>vs</i> 72(62, 81), <i>U</i>=12 220.50, <i>P</i><0.001], total white blood cell count (10<sup>9</sup>/L)[11.3(9.2, 14.1) <i>vs</i> 8.5(6.6, 11.2), <i>U</i>=10 825.50, <i>P</i><0.001], hemoglobin (g/L)[157(147, 166) <i>vs</i> 143(129, 154), <i>U</i>=9 404.50, <i>P</i><0.001], platelet count (10<sup>9</sup>/L)[244(206, 297) <i>vs</i> 207(173, 253), <i>U</i>=11 680, <i>P</i><0.001], uric acid (μmol/L)[380(315, 446) <i>vs</i> 347(265, 412), <i>U</i>=14 805.50, <i>P=</i>0.005], ST segment elevation [204(76.4%) <i>vs</i> 57(42.5%), <i>χ</i>²=73.03, <i>P</i><0.001] and Q wave formation [76(28.5%) <i>vs</i> 17(12.7%), <i>χ</i>²=12.47, <i>P</i><0.001] in ECG were higher than those in myocarditis group. The duration of onset (hs) [6(3, 25) <i>vs</i> 48(24, 73), <i>U</i>=27911, <i>P</i><0.001], heart rate (beats/min)[82(74, 92) <i>vs</i> 92(78, 103), <i>U</i>=22 347, <i>P</i><0.001], D-dimer (μg/ml)[0.23(0.17, 0.51) <i>vs</i> 0.61(0.30, 1.38), <i>U</i>=25 806, <i>P</i><0.001], High-sensitivity troponin T/99th percentile upper reference limit [5(1, 36) <i>vs</i> 16(8, 39), <i>U</i>=22 577, <i>P</i><0.001], NT-proBNP (pg/ml) [204(64, 644) <i>vs</i> 824(189, 4 043), <i>U</i>=25 134, <i>P</i><0.001], C-reactive protein (mg/L)[6(3, 9) <i>vs</i> 24(6, 55), <i>U</i>=26 349.50, <i>P</i><0.001] and body temperature (℃) [36.50(36.30, 36.60) <i>vs</i> 37.35(36.50, 38.50), <i>U</i>=26 961, <i>P</i><0.001] were significantly lower than those in myocarditis group, the symptoms of chest pain in myocardial infarction group was significantly higher than those in myocarditis group [262(98.1%) <i>vs</i> 83(61.9%), <i>χ</i>²=97.24, <i>P</i><0.001], and the history of prodromal infection [12(4.5%) <i>vs</i> 112(83.6%), <i>χ</i>²=261.26, <i>P</i><0.001], syncope [11(4.1%) <i>vs</i> 18(13.4%), <i>χ</i>²=11.53, <i>P</i><0.001] and shock [6(2.2%) <i>vs</i> 22(16.4%), <i>χ</i>²=27.59, <i>P</i><0.001] in myocardial infarction group were significantly lower than those in myocarditis group. With acute myocardial infarction as the target outcome, 8 influencing factors selected by LASSO regression, and 5 independent influencing factors were found after multiple Logistic regression, those were age (<i>OR</i>=1.21, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.12-1.31; <i>P</i><0.001), pre-infection (<i>OR</i>=0.02, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.01-0.06; <i>P</i><0.001), body temperature (<i>OR</i>=0.37, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.18-0.77; <i>P</i>=0.008), chest pain (<i>OR</i>=26.75, 95%<i>CI</i>: 5.87-121.81; <i>P</i><0.001) and white blood cell count (<i>OR</i>=1.27, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.12-1.44; <i>P</i><0.001). Younger age, high body temperature and pre-infection are independent predictors for acute myocarditis, while chest pain and elevated white blood cell count are independent predictors for acute myocardial infarction. The five influencing factors selected by multivariate logistic regression and their combined diagnostic model were subjected to ROC analysis. The AUC reached 0.969, sensitivity reached 0.940 and specificity reached 0.925. Calibration curve and decision curve analysis(DCA) demonstrate that the model possesses excellent clinical application value. In conclusion, age, chest pain, pre-infection, body temperature and white blood cell count were independent factors in distinguishing acute myocardial infarction and acute myocarditis in young people. The clinical differential diagnosis model based on 5 independent factors may has high efficiency and good clinical practicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":24033,"journal":{"name":"中华预防医学杂志","volume":"59 3","pages":"365-374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华预防医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240924-00770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the value of general information and rapid laboratory tests obtained from the emergency department in the early diagnosis and prevention of young patients with acute myocardial infarction and acute myocarditis, in order to prevent the disease from progressing to a critical stage. This study employs a retrospective observational study, compiling clinical data from young patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction or acute myocarditis who were admitted to the Department of Cardiology or Emergency Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2015 to September 2024. Demographic information and laboratory test results from both the outpatient and emergency departments were retrieved. The acute myocardial infarction group comprised 267 patients (257 males, 10 females) aged 23-44 ys, while the acute myocarditis group included 134 patients (93 males, 41 females) aged 18-44 ys. A comparative analysis of the clinical data between the two groups was conducted, encompassing variables such as age, gender, comorbidities, high-risk factors, emergency blood routine tests, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, coagulation profiles, renal function tests, NT-proBNP levels, myocardial injury markers, electrocardiogram readings, blood pressure, and heart rate. The results showed that:Compared with the young myocarditis group, the myocardial infarction group was older (ys)[38(35, 42) vs 30(25, 37), U=7 893, P<0.001], more male [257(96.3%) vs 93(69.4%), χ²=57.95, P<0.001], more smoking [211(79.0%)vs 38(28.4%), χ²=97.32, P<0.001], drinking history [125(46.8%) vs 22(16.4%), χ²=35.51, P<0.001], family history of coronary heart disease [45(16.9%) vs 3(2.2%), χ²=18.09, P<0.001], hypertension [100(37.5%) vs 12(9.0%), χ²=36, P<0.001] and diabetes [42(15.7%) vs 4(3.0%), χ²=14.27, P<0.001]. Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)[126(114, 144) vs 119(101, 126), U=11 389.50, P<0.001], diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)[80(70, 93) vs 72(62, 81), U=12 220.50, P<0.001], total white blood cell count (109/L)[11.3(9.2, 14.1) vs 8.5(6.6, 11.2), U=10 825.50, P<0.001], hemoglobin (g/L)[157(147, 166) vs 143(129, 154), U=9 404.50, P<0.001], platelet count (109/L)[244(206, 297) vs 207(173, 253), U=11 680, P<0.001], uric acid (μmol/L)[380(315, 446) vs 347(265, 412), U=14 805.50, P=0.005], ST segment elevation [204(76.4%) vs 57(42.5%), χ²=73.03, P<0.001] and Q wave formation [76(28.5%) vs 17(12.7%), χ²=12.47, P<0.001] in ECG were higher than those in myocarditis group. The duration of onset (hs) [6(3, 25) vs 48(24, 73), U=27911, P<0.001], heart rate (beats/min)[82(74, 92) vs 92(78, 103), U=22 347, P<0.001], D-dimer (μg/ml)[0.23(0.17, 0.51) vs 0.61(0.30, 1.38), U=25 806, P<0.001], High-sensitivity troponin T/99th percentile upper reference limit [5(1, 36) vs 16(8, 39), U=22 577, P<0.001], NT-proBNP (pg/ml) [204(64, 644) vs 824(189, 4 043), U=25 134, P<0.001], C-reactive protein (mg/L)[6(3, 9) vs 24(6, 55), U=26 349.50, P<0.001] and body temperature (℃) [36.50(36.30, 36.60) vs 37.35(36.50, 38.50), U=26 961, P<0.001] were significantly lower than those in myocarditis group, the symptoms of chest pain in myocardial infarction group was significantly higher than those in myocarditis group [262(98.1%) vs 83(61.9%), χ²=97.24, P<0.001], and the history of prodromal infection [12(4.5%) vs 112(83.6%), χ²=261.26, P<0.001], syncope [11(4.1%) vs 18(13.4%), χ²=11.53, P<0.001] and shock [6(2.2%) vs 22(16.4%), χ²=27.59, P<0.001] in myocardial infarction group were significantly lower than those in myocarditis group. With acute myocardial infarction as the target outcome, 8 influencing factors selected by LASSO regression, and 5 independent influencing factors were found after multiple Logistic regression, those were age (OR=1.21, 95%CI: 1.12-1.31; P<0.001), pre-infection (OR=0.02, 95%CI: 0.01-0.06; P<0.001), body temperature (OR=0.37, 95%CI: 0.18-0.77; P=0.008), chest pain (OR=26.75, 95%CI: 5.87-121.81; P<0.001) and white blood cell count (OR=1.27, 95%CI: 1.12-1.44; P<0.001). Younger age, high body temperature and pre-infection are independent predictors for acute myocarditis, while chest pain and elevated white blood cell count are independent predictors for acute myocardial infarction. The five influencing factors selected by multivariate logistic regression and their combined diagnostic model were subjected to ROC analysis. The AUC reached 0.969, sensitivity reached 0.940 and specificity reached 0.925. Calibration curve and decision curve analysis(DCA) demonstrate that the model possesses excellent clinical application value. In conclusion, age, chest pain, pre-infection, body temperature and white blood cell count were independent factors in distinguishing acute myocardial infarction and acute myocarditis in young people. The clinical differential diagnosis model based on 5 independent factors may has high efficiency and good clinical practicability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华预防医学杂志
中华预防医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12678
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine (CJPM), the successor to Chinese Health Journal , was initiated on October 1, 1953. In 1960, it was amalgamated with the Chinese Medical Journal and the Journal of Medical History and Health Care , and thereafter, was renamed as People’s Care . On November 25, 1978, the publication was denominated as Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine . The contents of CJPM deal with a wide range of disciplines and technologies including epidemiology, environmental health, nutrition and food hygiene, occupational health, hygiene for children and adolescents, radiological health, toxicology, biostatistics, social medicine, pathogenic and epidemiological research in malignant tumor, surveillance and immunization.
期刊最新文献
[Expert consensus on the diagnosis and clinical management of anaphylaxis]. [Analysis of non-communicable disease prevention and control policy implementation in China from 2014 to 2021]. [Analysis of the associated factors and cumulative effects of cardiometabolic multimorbidity among residents in southern Xinjiang]. [Analysis of the current status and related factors of antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection in rural communities of Zhangqiu District, Jinan City]. [Application and effect evaluation of the management system for whole process prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1