Comparison of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality and Clown Dentists as Anxiety Management Tools among 3-13-year-old Children for Dental Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q3 Dentistry International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2972
Sfurty Prakash, Neha Sheoran, Bhavna G Saraf, Vrinda Sharma, Wajiha Khan, Manish Shaw
{"title":"Comparison of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality and Clown Dentists as Anxiety Management Tools among 3-13-year-old Children for Dental Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sfurty Prakash, Neha Sheoran, Bhavna G Saraf, Vrinda Sharma, Wajiha Khan, Manish Shaw","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The procedural pain in dentistry has undesirable effect on child's psychology and future dental visits; therefore, means to decrease these is absolutely essential.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness and comparison of virtual reality (VR) and clown dentists as anxiety management tools.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This prospective three-arm randomized controlled trial included children aged 3-13 years. They were divided randomly into three groups, a control group (group I) in whom no anxiety management was given and two test groups in whom intervention by VR (group II) or clown dentists/hospital clown (group III) was imparted. Heart rate and anxiety scores were measured by Chota Bheem-Chutki (CBC) pain scale before and after procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was analyzed for 159 children. The mean anxiety pretreatment in group I was 2.09, in group II it was 3.03, and in group III it was 3.15. Posttreatment, the anxiety level spiked in group I to 3.20, whereas it dipped in group II and III, the mean level being 1.81 and 1.84, respectively, the difference being statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anxiety and hemodynamic parameter were lower in both intervention groups (VR and dental clown) than those of the control group.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Prakash S, Sheoran N, Saraf BG, <i>et al</i>. Comparison of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality and Clown Dentists as Anxiety Management Tools among 3-13-year-old Children for Dental Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(1):105-113.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 1","pages":"105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The procedural pain in dentistry has undesirable effect on child's psychology and future dental visits; therefore, means to decrease these is absolutely essential.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness and comparison of virtual reality (VR) and clown dentists as anxiety management tools.

Design: This prospective three-arm randomized controlled trial included children aged 3-13 years. They were divided randomly into three groups, a control group (group I) in whom no anxiety management was given and two test groups in whom intervention by VR (group II) or clown dentists/hospital clown (group III) was imparted. Heart rate and anxiety scores were measured by Chota Bheem-Chutki (CBC) pain scale before and after procedure.

Results: Data was analyzed for 159 children. The mean anxiety pretreatment in group I was 2.09, in group II it was 3.03, and in group III it was 3.15. Posttreatment, the anxiety level spiked in group I to 3.20, whereas it dipped in group II and III, the mean level being 1.81 and 1.84, respectively, the difference being statistically significant.

Conclusion: The anxiety and hemodynamic parameter were lower in both intervention groups (VR and dental clown) than those of the control group.

How to cite this article: Prakash S, Sheoran N, Saraf BG, et al. Comparison of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality and Clown Dentists as Anxiety Management Tools among 3-13-year-old Children for Dental Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(1):105-113.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟现实和小丑牙医作为3-13岁儿童牙科手术焦虑管理工具的有效性比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:牙科手术过程中的疼痛对儿童心理及以后的牙科就诊有不良影响;因此,减少这些的方法是绝对必要的。目的:评价虚拟现实(VR)和小丑牙医作为焦虑管理工具的有效性和比较。设计:该前瞻性三组随机对照试验纳入3-13岁儿童。他们被随机分为三组,对照组(I组)不给予焦虑管理,两个实验组(II组)给予VR或小丑牙医/医院小丑干预(III组)。手术前后采用Chota Bheem-Chutki (CBC)疼痛量表测量心率和焦虑评分。结果:对159例患儿进行数据分析。第一组焦虑预处理平均为2.09分,第二组为3.03分,第三组为3.15分。治疗后,第一组的焦虑水平上升至3.20,而第二组和第三组的焦虑水平下降,平均水平分别为1.81和1.84,差异具有统计学意义。结论:两个干预组(VR组和牙小丑组)的焦虑和血流动力学参数均低于对照组。如何引用本文:Prakash S, Sheoran N, Saraf BG等。虚拟现实和小丑牙医作为3-13岁儿童牙科手术焦虑管理工具的有效性比较:一项随机对照试验。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(1):105-113。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Clinical Performance of Two Resin Composite Materials in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An Observational Study. An In Vivo Study to Compare and Evaluate the Antimicrobial Efficacy and pH Change of GC Tooth Mousse and CurodontTM Protect against Streptococcus mutans. Bite Force Distribution and Occlusal Adjustment in Stainless Steel Crowns and BioFlx Crowns of Children Aged 4-8 Years. Clinical Assessment of a Newer Resin-based Bioactive Restorative Cement on Class II Cavities of Primary Molars: A Comparative Analysis. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Photodynamic Therapy in Root Canal Treatment of Primary Molars: A 15-month Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1