Lower Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Lower Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in the Southern Community Cohort Study.

Lauren Giurini, Ronald E Gangnon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Wei Zheng, Loren Lipworth, Harvey J Murff, Mark Steinwandel, Jennifer Weiss, Shaneda Warren Andersen
{"title":"Lower Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Lower Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in the Southern Community Cohort Study.","authors":"Lauren Giurini, Ronald E Gangnon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Wei Zheng, Loren Lipworth, Harvey J Murff, Mark Steinwandel, Jennifer Weiss, Shaneda Warren Andersen","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer is highly preventable with timely screening, but screening modalities are widely underused, especially among those of low individual-level socioeconomic status (SES). In addition to individual-level SES, neighborhood-level SES may also play a role in colorectal cancer screening completion through less geographic access to health care, transportation, and community knowledge of and support for screenings. We investigated the associations of neighborhood SES using a census tract-level measure of social and economic conditions with the uptake of colonoscopy and stool-based testing. We utilized data from the Southern Community Cohort Study, a large, prospective study of English-speaking adults ages 40 to 79 from the southeastern United States with 65% of participants identifying as non-Hispanic Black and 53% having annual household income <$15,000. Neighborhood SES was measured via a neighborhood deprivation index compiled from principal component analysis of 11 census-tract variables in the domains of education, employment, occupation, and poverty; screening was self-reported at the baseline interview (2002-2009) and follow-up interview (2008-2012). We found that participants residing in the lowest SES areas had lower odds of ever undergoing colonoscopy (ORQ5vsQ1 = 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.82) or stool-based colorectal cancer testing (ORQ5vsQ1 = 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.80) while adjusting for individual-level SES factors. Associations were consistent between neighborhood SES and screening in subgroups defined by race, sex, household income, insurance, or education (P > 0.20 for all interaction tests). Our findings suggest that barriers to screening exist at the neighborhood level and that residents of lower SES neighborhoods may experience more barriers to screening using colonoscopy and stool-based modalities. Prevention Relevance: This study presents evidence that persons living in lower SES neighborhoods use colorectal cancer screening modalities at lower rates. Screening is highly preventive of colorectal cancer, but it has limited benefit if it cannot be utilized. Addressing neighborhood-level barriers to screening may improve socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"355-363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is highly preventable with timely screening, but screening modalities are widely underused, especially among those of low individual-level socioeconomic status (SES). In addition to individual-level SES, neighborhood-level SES may also play a role in colorectal cancer screening completion through less geographic access to health care, transportation, and community knowledge of and support for screenings. We investigated the associations of neighborhood SES using a census tract-level measure of social and economic conditions with the uptake of colonoscopy and stool-based testing. We utilized data from the Southern Community Cohort Study, a large, prospective study of English-speaking adults ages 40 to 79 from the southeastern United States with 65% of participants identifying as non-Hispanic Black and 53% having annual household income <$15,000. Neighborhood SES was measured via a neighborhood deprivation index compiled from principal component analysis of 11 census-tract variables in the domains of education, employment, occupation, and poverty; screening was self-reported at the baseline interview (2002-2009) and follow-up interview (2008-2012). We found that participants residing in the lowest SES areas had lower odds of ever undergoing colonoscopy (ORQ5vsQ1 = 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.82) or stool-based colorectal cancer testing (ORQ5vsQ1 = 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.80) while adjusting for individual-level SES factors. Associations were consistent between neighborhood SES and screening in subgroups defined by race, sex, household income, insurance, or education (P > 0.20 for all interaction tests). Our findings suggest that barriers to screening exist at the neighborhood level and that residents of lower SES neighborhoods may experience more barriers to screening using colonoscopy and stool-based modalities. Prevention Relevance: This study presents evidence that persons living in lower SES neighborhoods use colorectal cancer screening modalities at lower rates. Screening is highly preventive of colorectal cancer, but it has limited benefit if it cannot be utilized. Addressing neighborhood-level barriers to screening may improve socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在南部社区队列研究中,较低的社区社会经济地位与较低的结直肠癌筛查率有关。
结直肠癌(CRC)通过及时筛查是高度可预防的,但筛查方式广泛未得到充分利用,特别是在低个人社会经济地位(SES)的人群中。除了个人层面的SES,社区层面的SES也可能在CRC筛查完成中发挥作用,因为地理上获得医疗保健、交通、社区对筛查的知识和支持较少。我们使用人口普查区水平的社会和经济条件测量与结肠镜检查和粪便检测之间的关系进行了调查。我们使用了来自南方社区队列研究的数据,这是一项来自美国东南部的40-79岁英语成年人的大型前瞻性研究,65%的参与者是非西班牙裔黑人,53%的参与者家庭年收入为0.20(所有相互作用测试)。我们的研究结果表明,筛查障碍存在于社区层面,低社会经济地位社区的居民在使用结肠镜检查和基于粪便的方式进行筛查时可能会遇到更多障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Was It Worth It? Response Data from >650 US and International Participants in Chemoprevention Trials. Discovery and Validation of Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiation of Nondysplastic Barrett's Esophagus from High-grade Dysplasia and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. An Exploratory Survey on the Use of Anal Cytology as a Tool for Anal Cancer Screening in Italy. Time-Restricted Eating and Metformin in Invasive Breast Cancer or DCIS: A Randomized, Phase IIb, Presurgical Trial. Preliminary Safety Analysis. Comparing Breast Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography: Why Are Statins More Widely Accepted Compared with Chemoprevention?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1