Moral sensitivity in Iranian nurses: insights from a nationwide meta-analysis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02940-1
Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh, Fazel Dehvan, Ladan Sedighi
{"title":"Moral sensitivity in Iranian nurses: insights from a nationwide meta-analysis.","authors":"Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh, Fazel Dehvan, Ladan Sedighi","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02940-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moral sensitivity is essential for nurses to recognize and appropriately respond to ethical issues, understanding the impact of their actions on patient well-being. It improves care quality, ethical decision-making, and equips nurses with skills to handle moral dilemmas in clinical settings. Various studies in Iran have reported different results. Accordingly, this study was conducted to estimate the pooled standardized moral sensitivity score among Iranian nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of national and international databases was conducted up until June 2023, yielding 563 articles. After screening by two independent researchers, 52 articles with a total sample size of 11,621 participants were included in the analysis. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² index. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the language of the articles, sample size, and country region. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between the moral sensitivity score and variables such as age, year of publication, and sample size. All analyses were performed using Stata software, version 17.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled moral sensitivity score was 69% (95% CI: 66-72, I<sup>2</sup> = 94.03%). The highest overall ethical sensitivity score was observed in region 5 of the country (73.6%, 95% CI: 67-80.1), in articles published in Farsi (70.2%, 95% CI: 65.8-74.7), and in articles with a sample size of less than 200 participants (70%, 95% CI: 66.3-73.6). No significant relationship was found between the overall ethical sensitivity score and variables such as age, year of publication, or sample size. Publication bias was significant (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis indicates a moderate level of moral sensitivity among Iranian nurses. While regional and study-related differences were observed, no significant relationship was found between the moral sensitivity score and variables like age, year of publication, or sample size. Publication bias suggests the need for more representative studies to fully understand the factors influencing moral sensitivity in nursing.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis, and not a clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02940-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Moral sensitivity is essential for nurses to recognize and appropriately respond to ethical issues, understanding the impact of their actions on patient well-being. It improves care quality, ethical decision-making, and equips nurses with skills to handle moral dilemmas in clinical settings. Various studies in Iran have reported different results. Accordingly, this study was conducted to estimate the pooled standardized moral sensitivity score among Iranian nurses.

Methods: A systematic search of national and international databases was conducted up until June 2023, yielding 563 articles. After screening by two independent researchers, 52 articles with a total sample size of 11,621 participants were included in the analysis. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² index. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the language of the articles, sample size, and country region. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between the moral sensitivity score and variables such as age, year of publication, and sample size. All analyses were performed using Stata software, version 17.

Results: The pooled moral sensitivity score was 69% (95% CI: 66-72, I2 = 94.03%). The highest overall ethical sensitivity score was observed in region 5 of the country (73.6%, 95% CI: 67-80.1), in articles published in Farsi (70.2%, 95% CI: 65.8-74.7), and in articles with a sample size of less than 200 participants (70%, 95% CI: 66.3-73.6). No significant relationship was found between the overall ethical sensitivity score and variables such as age, year of publication, or sample size. Publication bias was significant (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates a moderate level of moral sensitivity among Iranian nurses. While regional and study-related differences were observed, no significant relationship was found between the moral sensitivity score and variables like age, year of publication, or sample size. Publication bias suggests the need for more representative studies to fully understand the factors influencing moral sensitivity in nursing.

Clinical trial number: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis, and not a clinical trial.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗护士的道德敏感性:来自全国荟萃分析的见解。
背景:道德敏感性对于护士认识和适当应对伦理问题,理解他们的行为对患者福祉的影响至关重要。它提高了护理质量,道德决策,并使护士具备处理临床环境中道德困境的技能。伊朗的各种研究报告了不同的结果。因此,本研究旨在估计伊朗护士的标准化道德敏感性评分。方法:系统检索截至2023年6月的国内外数据库,共检索到563篇文献。经过两位独立研究人员的筛选,总共有52篇文章,11,621名参与者被纳入分析。任何分歧都通过讨论解决了。使用I²指数评估异质性。根据文章的语言、样本量和国家地区进行亚组分析。采用meta回归分析探讨道德敏感性得分与年龄、发表年份、样本量等变量的关系。所有分析均使用Stata软件,版本17进行。结果:综合道德敏感性评分为69% (95% CI: 66 ~ 72, I2 = 94.03%)。最高的总体伦理敏感性评分出现在该国的第5地区(73.6%,95% CI: 67-80.1)、波斯语发表的文章(70.2%,95% CI: 65.8-74.7)和样本量少于200名参与者的文章(70%,95% CI: 66.3-73.6)。总体伦理敏感性评分与年龄、发表年份或样本量等变量之间没有显著关系。发表偏倚显著(p = 0.001)。结论:本荟萃分析表明伊朗护士具有中等水平的道德敏感性。虽然观察到区域和研究相关的差异,但没有发现道德敏感性得分与年龄、出版年份或样本量等变量之间的显著关系。发表偏倚提示需要更多具有代表性的研究来充分了解影响护理道德敏感性的因素。临床试验编号:本研究为系统综述和荟萃分析,并非临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a socio-cognitive mindfulness program using a mobile application to promote nursing students' mindfulness, emotion regulation, and empathy: a quasi-experimental study. Identifying and addressing health problems of school children through the Omaha System: a nurse-led intervention study in suburban Istanbul. Advantages and challenges for utilization of generative artificial intelligence in clinical nursing practice: an integrative review. Weaving spiritual care into nursing education: how the use of a self-assessment tool motivates students in a qualitative study. The experience of newly qualified nurses one year after prematurely transitioning to the professional world during the Covid-19 pandemic in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1