{"title":"Constraining string cosmology with the gravitational-wave background using the NANOGrav 15-year data set","authors":"Qin Tan, You Wu, Lang Liu","doi":"10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13998-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multiple pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations, including the European PTA in partnership with the Indian PTA, the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav), the Parkes PTA, and the Chinese PTA have recently reported strong evidence for a signal at nanohertz, potentially the first detection of the stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB). We investigate whether the NANOGrav signal is consistent with the SGWB predicted by string cosmology models. By performing Bayesian parameter estimation on the NANOGrav 15-year data set, we constrain the key parameters of a string cosmology model: the frequency <span>\\(f_s\\)</span> and the fractional energy density <span>\\(\\Omega _\\textrm{gw}^{s}\\)</span> of gravitational waves at the end of the dilaton-driven stage, and the Hubble parameter <span>\\(H_r\\)</span> at the end of the string phase. Our analysis yields constraints of <span>\\(f_s = 1.2^{+0.6}_{-\\,0.6}\\times 10^{-8} \\textrm{Hz}\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\Omega _\\textrm{gw}^{s} = 2.9^{+5.4}_{-2.3}\\times 10^{-8}\\)</span>, consistent with theoretical predictions from string cosmology. However, the current NANOGrav data is not sensitive to the <span>\\(H_r\\)</span> parameter. We also compare the string cosmology model to a simple power-law model using Bayesian model selection, finding a Bayes factor of 2.2 in favor of the string cosmology model. Future pulsar timing array observations with improved sensitivity and extended frequency coverage will enable tighter constraints on string cosmology parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":788,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal C","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13998-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal C","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13998-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiple pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations, including the European PTA in partnership with the Indian PTA, the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav), the Parkes PTA, and the Chinese PTA have recently reported strong evidence for a signal at nanohertz, potentially the first detection of the stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB). We investigate whether the NANOGrav signal is consistent with the SGWB predicted by string cosmology models. By performing Bayesian parameter estimation on the NANOGrav 15-year data set, we constrain the key parameters of a string cosmology model: the frequency \(f_s\) and the fractional energy density \(\Omega _\textrm{gw}^{s}\) of gravitational waves at the end of the dilaton-driven stage, and the Hubble parameter \(H_r\) at the end of the string phase. Our analysis yields constraints of \(f_s = 1.2^{+0.6}_{-\,0.6}\times 10^{-8} \textrm{Hz}\) and \(\Omega _\textrm{gw}^{s} = 2.9^{+5.4}_{-2.3}\times 10^{-8}\), consistent with theoretical predictions from string cosmology. However, the current NANOGrav data is not sensitive to the \(H_r\) parameter. We also compare the string cosmology model to a simple power-law model using Bayesian model selection, finding a Bayes factor of 2.2 in favor of the string cosmology model. Future pulsar timing array observations with improved sensitivity and extended frequency coverage will enable tighter constraints on string cosmology parameters.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physics I: Accelerator Based High-Energy Physics
Hadron and lepton collider physics
Lepton-nucleon scattering
High-energy nuclear reactions
Standard model precision tests
Search for new physics beyond the standard model
Heavy flavour physics
Neutrino properties
Particle detector developments
Computational methods and analysis tools
Experimental Physics II: Astroparticle Physics
Dark matter searches
High-energy cosmic rays
Double beta decay
Long baseline neutrino experiments
Neutrino astronomy
Axions and other weakly interacting light particles
Gravitational waves and observational cosmology
Particle detector developments
Computational methods and analysis tools
Theoretical Physics I: Phenomenology of the Standard Model and Beyond
Electroweak interactions
Quantum chromo dynamics
Heavy quark physics and quark flavour mixing
Neutrino physics
Phenomenology of astro- and cosmoparticle physics
Meson spectroscopy and non-perturbative QCD
Low-energy effective field theories
Lattice field theory
High temperature QCD and heavy ion physics
Phenomenology of supersymmetric extensions of the SM
Phenomenology of non-supersymmetric extensions of the SM
Model building and alternative models of electroweak symmetry breaking
Flavour physics beyond the SM
Computational algorithms and tools...etc.