Development of PDAC diagnosis and prognosis evaluation models based on machine learning.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13929-z
Yingqi Xiao, Shixin Sun, Naxin Zheng, Jing Zhao, Xiaohan Li, Jianmin Xu, Haolian Li, Chenran Du, Lijun Zeng, Juling Zhang, Xiuyun Yin, Yuan Huang, Xuemei Yang, Fang Yuan, Xingwang Jia, Boan Li, Bo Li
{"title":"Development of PDAC diagnosis and prognosis evaluation models based on machine learning.","authors":"Yingqi Xiao, Shixin Sun, Naxin Zheng, Jing Zhao, Xiaohan Li, Jianmin Xu, Haolian Li, Chenran Du, Lijun Zeng, Juling Zhang, Xiuyun Yin, Yuan Huang, Xuemei Yang, Fang Yuan, Xingwang Jia, Boan Li, Bo Li","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13929-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is difficult to detect early and highly aggressive, often leading to poor patient prognosis. Existing serum biomarkers like CA19-9 are limited in early diagnosis, failing to meet clinical needs. Machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL) technologies have shown great potential in biomedicine. This study aims to establish PDAC differential diagnosis and prognosis assessment models using ML combined with serum biomarkers for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized treatment recommendations, improving early diagnosis rates and patient survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included serum biomarker data and prognosis information from 117 PDAC patients. ML models (Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NNET), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)) were used for differential diagnosis, evaluated by accuracy, Kappa test, ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. COX proportional hazards model and DeepSurv DL model predicted survival risk, compared by C-index and Log-rank test. Based on DeepSurv's risk predictions, personalized treatment recommendations were made and their effectiveness assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effective PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models were built using ML. The validation set data shows that the accuracy of the RF, NNET, SVM, and GBM models are 84.21%, 84.21%, 76.97%, and 83.55%; the sensitivity are 91.26%, 90.29%, 89.32%, and 88.35%; and the specificity are 69.39%, 71.43%, 51.02%, and 73.47%. The Kappa values are 0.6266, 0.6307, 0.4336, and 0.6215; and the AUC are 0.889, 0.8488, 0.8488, and 0.8704, respectively. BCAT1, AMY, and CA12-5 were selected as modeling parameters for the prognosis model using COX regression. DeepSurv outperformed the COX model on both training and validation sets, with C-indexes of 0.738 and 0.724, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicate that personalized treatment recommendations based on DeepSurv can help patients achieve survival benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study built efficient PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models using ML, improving early diagnosis rates and prognosis accuracy. The DeepSurv model excelled in prognosis prediction and successfully guided personalized treatment recommendations and supporting PDAC clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13929-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is difficult to detect early and highly aggressive, often leading to poor patient prognosis. Existing serum biomarkers like CA19-9 are limited in early diagnosis, failing to meet clinical needs. Machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL) technologies have shown great potential in biomedicine. This study aims to establish PDAC differential diagnosis and prognosis assessment models using ML combined with serum biomarkers for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized treatment recommendations, improving early diagnosis rates and patient survival.

Methods: The study included serum biomarker data and prognosis information from 117 PDAC patients. ML models (Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NNET), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)) were used for differential diagnosis, evaluated by accuracy, Kappa test, ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. COX proportional hazards model and DeepSurv DL model predicted survival risk, compared by C-index and Log-rank test. Based on DeepSurv's risk predictions, personalized treatment recommendations were made and their effectiveness assessed.

Results: Effective PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models were built using ML. The validation set data shows that the accuracy of the RF, NNET, SVM, and GBM models are 84.21%, 84.21%, 76.97%, and 83.55%; the sensitivity are 91.26%, 90.29%, 89.32%, and 88.35%; and the specificity are 69.39%, 71.43%, 51.02%, and 73.47%. The Kappa values are 0.6266, 0.6307, 0.4336, and 0.6215; and the AUC are 0.889, 0.8488, 0.8488, and 0.8704, respectively. BCAT1, AMY, and CA12-5 were selected as modeling parameters for the prognosis model using COX regression. DeepSurv outperformed the COX model on both training and validation sets, with C-indexes of 0.738 and 0.724, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicate that personalized treatment recommendations based on DeepSurv can help patients achieve survival benefits.

Conclusion: This study built efficient PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models using ML, improving early diagnosis rates and prognosis accuracy. The DeepSurv model excelled in prognosis prediction and successfully guided personalized treatment recommendations and supporting PDAC clinical management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的 PDAC 诊断和预后评估模型的开发。
背景:胰腺导管腺癌(Pancreatic ductal adencarcinoma, PDAC)早期诊断困难且侵袭性强,常导致患者预后差。现有的血清生物标志物如CA19-9在早期诊断中的作用有限,不能满足临床需要。机器学习(ML)/深度学习(DL)技术在生物医学领域显示出巨大的潜力。本研究旨在通过ML联合血清生物标志物建立PDAC鉴别诊断和预后评估模型,进行早期诊断、风险分层、个性化治疗建议,提高早期诊断率和患者生存率。方法:收集117例PDAC患者的血清生物标志物数据和预后信息。使用ML模型(随机森林(RF)、神经网络(NNET)、支持向量机(SVM)和梯度增强机(GBM))进行鉴别诊断,通过准确性、Kappa检验、ROC曲线、敏感性和特异性进行评估。COX比例风险模型与DeepSurv DL模型预测生存风险,采用C-index和Log-rank检验进行比较。根据DeepSurv的风险预测,提出个性化治疗建议并评估其有效性。结果:利用ML建立了有效的PDAC诊断和预后模型,验证集数据显示,RF、NNET、SVM和GBM模型的准确率分别为84.21%、84.21%、76.97%和83.55%;灵敏度分别为91.26%、90.29%、89.32%和88.35%;特异性分别为69.39%、71.43%、51.02%、73.47%。Kappa值分别为0.6266、0.6307、0.4336、0.6215;AUC分别为0.889、0.8488、0.8488、0.8704。选择BCAT1、AMY和CA12-5作为预后模型的建模参数,采用COX回归。DeepSurv在训练集和验证集上都优于COX模型,c指数分别为0.738和0.724。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线表明,基于DeepSurv的个性化治疗建议可以帮助患者获得生存益处。结论:本研究利用ML建立了高效的PDAC诊断和预后模型,提高了早期诊断率和预后准确率。DeepSurv模型在预后预测方面表现出色,并成功指导个性化治疗建议,支持PDAC临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
The role of healthcare providers in shared decision making for cervical cancer prevention in Ghana: A qualitative study. Tumor-Infiltrating lymphocyte dynamics as biomarkers of neoadjuvant treatment response in luminal breast cancer. Delays and detours during cancer diagnosis: a cross-sectional study on patient pathways and provider intervals in public healthcare networks of Chile, Colombia and Ecuador. The mainz resilience assessment in childhood cancer (MRAcc): development of a novel age-specific patient-reported outcome measure to assess resilience in childhood cancer patients. Radiotherapy improves outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving nivolumab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1