Advance care planning and goals of care discussions in perioperative care: a scoping review

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.031
Zoe Keon-Cohen , Heather Loane , Lorena Romero , Daryl Jones , Jane Banaszak-Holl
{"title":"Advance care planning and goals of care discussions in perioperative care: a scoping review","authors":"Zoe Keon-Cohen ,&nbsp;Heather Loane ,&nbsp;Lorena Romero ,&nbsp;Daryl Jones ,&nbsp;Jane Banaszak-Holl","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Advance care planning is well established in general medical wards, but its implementation in anaesthesia and perioperative care presents unique challenges. Effective communication and shared decision-making regarding treatment limitations are essential to clarify care goals and provide timely, high-quality end-of-life care. Terminally ill patients with complex care needs can experience a higher risk of postoperative mortality during anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This scoping review examines the literature describing when and how advance care planning has been studied in perioperative care, focusing on patient characteristics, the content of advance care planning discussions, and impact on patient outcomes. The study follows PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Articles were collected from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases, using search terms from MeSH and synonyms for anaesthesia, surgery and perioperative care, advance care planning, living wills or advance directives, goals of care and terminal care, resuscitation orders, shared decision-making, and palliative care discussions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Advance care planning documentation varies across surgical specialties and settings, with higher rates in emergency and palliative surgery. Patient factors, such as age and comorbidities, impact completion of advance care planning. Structurally, the presence of interdisciplinary teams, increased decision-making aids, and structured discussions improve implementation. Barriers included a lack of consistency in terminology, poor timing of needed conversations, a lack of cultural sensitivities, and patient fears of abandonment and palliative care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Further research is required to determine the most appropriate and beneficial methods and outcomes for implementing advance care planning into perioperative and end-of-life care, ensuring appropriate, timely, and patient-oriented care delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 5","pages":"Pages 1318-1332"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091225000959","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Advance care planning is well established in general medical wards, but its implementation in anaesthesia and perioperative care presents unique challenges. Effective communication and shared decision-making regarding treatment limitations are essential to clarify care goals and provide timely, high-quality end-of-life care. Terminally ill patients with complex care needs can experience a higher risk of postoperative mortality during anaesthesia.

Methods

This scoping review examines the literature describing when and how advance care planning has been studied in perioperative care, focusing on patient characteristics, the content of advance care planning discussions, and impact on patient outcomes. The study follows PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Articles were collected from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases, using search terms from MeSH and synonyms for anaesthesia, surgery and perioperative care, advance care planning, living wills or advance directives, goals of care and terminal care, resuscitation orders, shared decision-making, and palliative care discussions.

Results

Advance care planning documentation varies across surgical specialties and settings, with higher rates in emergency and palliative surgery. Patient factors, such as age and comorbidities, impact completion of advance care planning. Structurally, the presence of interdisciplinary teams, increased decision-making aids, and structured discussions improve implementation. Barriers included a lack of consistency in terminology, poor timing of needed conversations, a lack of cultural sensitivities, and patient fears of abandonment and palliative care.

Conclusions

Further research is required to determine the most appropriate and beneficial methods and outcomes for implementing advance care planning into perioperative and end-of-life care, ensuring appropriate, timely, and patient-oriented care delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围手术期护理中的预先护理计划和护理目标讨论:范围界定综述。
背景:提前护理计划是很好的建立在普通病房,但其在麻醉和围手术期护理的实施提出了独特的挑战。关于治疗限制的有效沟通和共同决策对于明确护理目标和提供及时、高质量的临终关怀至关重要。有复杂护理需求的绝症患者在麻醉期间术后死亡的风险较高。方法:本范围综述研究了描述围手术期护理中何时以及如何研究提前护理计划的文献,重点关注患者特征、提前护理计划讨论的内容以及对患者预后的影响。该研究遵循PRISMA-ScR指南。文章从MEDLINE、CENTRAL和CINAHL数据库中收集,使用来自MeSH的搜索词和麻醉、手术和围手术期护理、预先护理计划、生前遗嘱或预先指示、护理目标和临终护理、复苏命令、共同决策和姑息治疗讨论的同义词。结果:提前护理计划文件因外科专科和环境而异,急诊和姑息性手术的比例较高。患者因素,如年龄和合并症,影响提前护理计划的完成。从结构上讲,跨学科团队的存在、决策辅助的增加和结构化讨论改善了实施。障碍包括术语缺乏一致性,所需对话的时机不佳,缺乏文化敏感性,以及患者对遗弃和姑息治疗的恐惧。结论:需要进一步的研究来确定在围手术期和临终关怀中实施预先护理计划的最合适和有益的方法和结果,以确保适当、及时和以患者为导向的护理提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
Sex as an effect modifier in the association between postoperative troponin and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective cohort study Erratum to ‘Anaesthetic gas emissions and procurement gaps in a low-middle-income country: a prospective observational analysis of end-tidal control’ [Br J Anaesth 2025; 135: 1839–41] Phase 1 single-centre, placebo and levobupivacaine controlled study in healthy volunteers to assess the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of LL10, a novel long-acting local anaesthetic The perils of multiple statistical tests: controlling for false positives Assessment of intraoperative opioid administration and waste practices after a change in controlled medication waste system: a retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1