Multimorbidity and analgesic-related harms: a systematic review

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.012
Christopher H. Grant , Heather Walker , Karen N. Barnett , Patrick B. Mark , Lesley A. Colvin , Samira Bell
{"title":"Multimorbidity and analgesic-related harms: a systematic review","authors":"Christopher H. Grant ,&nbsp;Heather Walker ,&nbsp;Karen N. Barnett ,&nbsp;Patrick B. Mark ,&nbsp;Lesley A. Colvin ,&nbsp;Samira Bell","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Multimorbidity is the presence of two or more long-term medical conditions. Chronic pain affects more than half of people with multimorbidity, and optimal treatment strategies are unknown. We aimed to quantify the risk of adverse outcomes from the following analgesics: opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and gabapentinoids in adults with multimorbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023462592). We searched Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL for studies reporting analgesic-related harms in people with multimorbidity or the impact of multimorbidity on harms in adults exposed to analgesics. Two researchers independently screened titles/abstracts, completed full-text reviews, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Studies were synthesised narratively, grouping by analgesic class and direction of effect.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We screened 6690 records and 344 full texts, with 27 studies included (<em>n</em>=2 671 958 patients). Studies were heterogenous, with variable quality (high risk of bias, <em>n</em>=11). Most studies on opioids reported adverse outcomes (12/16). Opioid use compared with non-use was associated with increased mortality in adults with multimorbidity. Multimorbidity was associated with opioid overdose and death among adults prescribed opioids for pain. Half of studies of NSAIDs reported adverse outcomes (6/11) including gastrointestinal bleeding. Only one study assessed gabapentinoids which found an association with delirium and pneumonia, but not mortality in people with multimorbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is evidence of harms associated with opioids in adults with multimorbidity, including overdose and increased mortality. There is a lack of evidence on gabapentinoids. Further research is required to understand optimal analgesic management in people with multimorbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review protocol</h3><div>PROSPERO (CRD42023462592).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 6","pages":"Pages 1717-1745"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000709122500114X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Multimorbidity is the presence of two or more long-term medical conditions. Chronic pain affects more than half of people with multimorbidity, and optimal treatment strategies are unknown. We aimed to quantify the risk of adverse outcomes from the following analgesics: opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and gabapentinoids in adults with multimorbidity.

Method

The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023462592). We searched Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL for studies reporting analgesic-related harms in people with multimorbidity or the impact of multimorbidity on harms in adults exposed to analgesics. Two researchers independently screened titles/abstracts, completed full-text reviews, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Studies were synthesised narratively, grouping by analgesic class and direction of effect.

Results

We screened 6690 records and 344 full texts, with 27 studies included (n=2 671 958 patients). Studies were heterogenous, with variable quality (high risk of bias, n=11). Most studies on opioids reported adverse outcomes (12/16). Opioid use compared with non-use was associated with increased mortality in adults with multimorbidity. Multimorbidity was associated with opioid overdose and death among adults prescribed opioids for pain. Half of studies of NSAIDs reported adverse outcomes (6/11) including gastrointestinal bleeding. Only one study assessed gabapentinoids which found an association with delirium and pneumonia, but not mortality in people with multimorbidity.

Conclusions

There is evidence of harms associated with opioids in adults with multimorbidity, including overdose and increased mortality. There is a lack of evidence on gabapentinoids. Further research is required to understand optimal analgesic management in people with multimorbidity.

Systematic review protocol

PROSPERO (CRD42023462592).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多病与镇痛相关的危害:系统综述。
背景:多病是指存在两种或两种以上的长期疾病。慢性疼痛影响超过一半的多病患者,最佳治疗策略尚不清楚。我们的目的是量化以下镇痛药的不良后果风险:阿片类药物、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和加巴喷丁类药物在患有多种疾病的成年人中的应用。方法:本综述在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023462592)。我们检索了Medline、CINAHL、Web of Science、Embase和CENTRAL,以获取有关多重疾病患者镇痛相关危害或多重疾病对暴露于镇痛药的成人危害影响的研究报告。两名研究人员独立筛选标题/摘要,完成全文综述,提取数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。采用叙事法综合研究,按镇痛药类别和疗效方向进行分组。结果:我们筛选了6690条记录和344篇全文,包括27项研究(n=2 671 958例患者)。研究是异质性的,质量不同(高偏倚风险,n=11)。大多数关于阿片类药物的研究报告了不良后果(12/16)。与不使用阿片类药物相比,使用阿片类药物与多病成人死亡率增加有关。在处方阿片类药物治疗疼痛的成年人中,多发病与阿片类药物过量和死亡有关。一半的非甾体抗炎药研究报告了不良后果(6/11),包括胃肠道出血。只有一项研究评估了加巴喷丁类药物,发现它与谵妄和肺炎有关,但与多病患者的死亡率无关。结论:有证据表明阿片类药物对患有多种疾病的成年人有危害,包括过量服用和死亡率增加。关于加巴喷丁类药物缺乏证据。需要进一步的研究来了解多病患者的最佳镇痛管理。系统评价方案:PROSPERO (CRD42023462592)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
qNOX index for quantification of intraoperative nociception and analgesia: the problem of neuromuscular block. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2025; 134: 736-45. Are adults with chronic pain more likely to develop hypertension than adults without chronic pain? Response to Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 429-31. Sip, don't skip: implementing 1-hour fasting in paediatric anaesthesia. Impact of continuing renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors before surgery on intraoperative hypotensive events: a secondary analysis of the STOP-or-NOT Trial. Association of non-anaemic iron deficiency with postoperative outcomes after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study: anaemia as a marker of haematopoietic fitness. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2025; 135: 322-30.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1