Gender-Affirming Vaginectomy with Concurrent Hysterectomy Compared to Staged Vaginectomy After Hysterectomy: A Cohort Study Analysis of 30-Day Perioperative Outcomes.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Urogynecology Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s00192-025-06112-2
Youngwu Kim-Ortega, Mireya P Taboada, Praskovia T Ivanenko, Milena M Weinstein
{"title":"Gender-Affirming Vaginectomy with Concurrent Hysterectomy Compared to Staged Vaginectomy After Hysterectomy: A Cohort Study Analysis of 30-Day Perioperative Outcomes.","authors":"Youngwu Kim-Ortega, Mireya P Taboada, Praskovia T Ivanenko, Milena M Weinstein","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06112-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate and compare 30-day perioperative outcomes of those undergoing gender-affirming vaginectomy with a hysterectomy and those with vaginectomy alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent gender-affirming transvaginal vaginectomy with or without concurrent minimally invasive hysterectomy at an academic institution from 2020 to 2023 by surgeons in the division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. The primary outcome was a composite of clinically significant surgical complications within 30 days of the procedure, including Emergency Department (ED) visits, readmissions, re-operations, and surgical and urinary tract infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients underwent gender-affirming transvaginal vaginectomy during the study period. Thirty-one patients had vaginectomy at the time of concurrent hysterectomy, while 37 patients had staged vaginectomy following hysterectomy. The median age was 32.8 years (27.6-38.8), and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.5 (SD 0.7). All concurrent hysterectomies were performed laparoscopically. Most demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups, except that the staged vaginectomy group had a longer duration of hormone therapy and higher parity. No significant differences were observed in the 30-day perioperative complications between those who underwent combined procedure transvaginal vaginectomy with or without minimally invasive hysterectomy. The only notable differences were an increase in the median estimated blood loss and a longer operative time in the concurrent hysterectomy and vaginectomy group. However, no patients in the cohort required a blood transfusion, and there was no difference in the total length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concurrently performing hysterectomy and vaginectomy adds no significant clinical morbidity to those undergoing vaginectomy as an interval procedure following hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"875-880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06112-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate and compare 30-day perioperative outcomes of those undergoing gender-affirming vaginectomy with a hysterectomy and those with vaginectomy alone.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent gender-affirming transvaginal vaginectomy with or without concurrent minimally invasive hysterectomy at an academic institution from 2020 to 2023 by surgeons in the division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. The primary outcome was a composite of clinically significant surgical complications within 30 days of the procedure, including Emergency Department (ED) visits, readmissions, re-operations, and surgical and urinary tract infections.

Results: Sixty-eight patients underwent gender-affirming transvaginal vaginectomy during the study period. Thirty-one patients had vaginectomy at the time of concurrent hysterectomy, while 37 patients had staged vaginectomy following hysterectomy. The median age was 32.8 years (27.6-38.8), and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.5 (SD 0.7). All concurrent hysterectomies were performed laparoscopically. Most demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups, except that the staged vaginectomy group had a longer duration of hormone therapy and higher parity. No significant differences were observed in the 30-day perioperative complications between those who underwent combined procedure transvaginal vaginectomy with or without minimally invasive hysterectomy. The only notable differences were an increase in the median estimated blood loss and a longer operative time in the concurrent hysterectomy and vaginectomy group. However, no patients in the cohort required a blood transfusion, and there was no difference in the total length of hospital stay.

Conclusions: Concurrently performing hysterectomy and vaginectomy adds no significant clinical morbidity to those undergoing vaginectomy as an interval procedure following hysterectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别确认阴道切除术并发子宫切除术与子宫切除术后分期阴道切除术的比较:一项30天围手术期结果的队列研究分析
前言:评价并比较性别确认阴道切除术合并子宫切除术与单纯阴道切除术围手术期30天的预后。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2020年至2023年在某学术机构接受性别确认经阴道切除术合并或不合并微创子宫切除术的患者,由泌尿妇科和重建盆腔外科医生进行。主要终点是手术后30天内临床显著手术并发症的综合,包括急诊就诊、再入院、再手术、手术和尿路感染。结果:68例患者在研究期间接受了性别确认阴道切除术。31例患者在同时行子宫切除术时行阴道切除术,37例患者在子宫切除术后分期行阴道切除术。年龄中位数为32.8岁(27.6 ~ 38.8),平均体重指数(BMI)为28.5 (SD 0.7)。所有同时进行的子宫切除术均在腹腔镜下进行。除了分阶段阴道切除术组的激素治疗时间更长,胎次更高外,两组的大多数人口统计学特征相似。经阴道联合阴道切除术加微创子宫切除术与不加微创子宫切除术的30天围手术期并发症无显著差异。唯一值得注意的差异是同时进行子宫和阴道切除术组的中位估计出血量增加和手术时间延长。然而,该队列中没有患者需要输血,住院总时间也没有差异。结论:同时行子宫和阴道切除术对那些在子宫切除术后间隔行阴道切除术的患者没有显著的临床发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
期刊最新文献
Robot-assisted, Laparoscopic and Transvaginal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Comparative Retrospective Single-Center Study. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptoms in Female Runners: A Cross Sectional Study. Emerging Urinary Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Phenotyping, and Treatment Monitoring in Female Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review. Mesh Exposure After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Concomitant Total Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Success Rate of Hong Kong Chinese Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Pessary Self-Management: a Multi-Centered Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1