Exploring Factors Influencing Motivation and Success in Teaching Patients Pessary Self-Management: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Urogynecology Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s00192-025-06118-w
Renée Börger, Evy Maria Bernadette Paulussen, Josephine Eissing, Marlies Yvette Bongers, Dorothea Maria Koppes, Mirjam Weemhoff
{"title":"Exploring Factors Influencing Motivation and Success in Teaching Patients Pessary Self-Management: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Renée Börger, Evy Maria Bernadette Paulussen, Josephine Eissing, Marlies Yvette Bongers, Dorothea Maria Koppes, Mirjam Weemhoff","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06118-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Pessary self-management (PSM) may increase patient autonomy and minimize the number of doctor consultations. However, little is known about the implementation and patient perception of PSM. This study aims to explore patients' experiences, opinions, and needs regarding PSM and how this was taught. Furthermore, to develop a standardized instruction manual.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews was conducted among patients with pessary therapy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). A preliminary framework was conducted for thematic content analysis. Three main themes were described: initial opinion, motivation and suggestions for healthcare workers and other patients regarding PSM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients were interviewed of which 11 performed PSM, five women refused PSM, and one woman was not able to perform PSM. The initial opinion of patients varied. Half of patients were confident in succeeding to perform PSM, and in the other half, nervousness and lack of confidence in being able to perform PSM predominated. Autonomy, hygiene and fewer doctor consultations were named as the main motivating factors to perform PSM. Reasons for not performing PSM were anxiety and existing comorbidities. Patients were generally satisfied with the way PSM was explained and named videos and information leaflets as tips.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This explorative qualitative study revealed the motivators and barriers to learning PSM. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing patients' concerns and providing adequate information. In doing so, it is important to create a supportive environment to increase patient engagement and confidence in managing their condition through PSM. These results can help to successfully implement PSM in future healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1633-1639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06118-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Pessary self-management (PSM) may increase patient autonomy and minimize the number of doctor consultations. However, little is known about the implementation and patient perception of PSM. This study aims to explore patients' experiences, opinions, and needs regarding PSM and how this was taught. Furthermore, to develop a standardized instruction manual.

Methods: A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews was conducted among patients with pessary therapy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). A preliminary framework was conducted for thematic content analysis. Three main themes were described: initial opinion, motivation and suggestions for healthcare workers and other patients regarding PSM.

Results: Seventeen patients were interviewed of which 11 performed PSM, five women refused PSM, and one woman was not able to perform PSM. The initial opinion of patients varied. Half of patients were confident in succeeding to perform PSM, and in the other half, nervousness and lack of confidence in being able to perform PSM predominated. Autonomy, hygiene and fewer doctor consultations were named as the main motivating factors to perform PSM. Reasons for not performing PSM were anxiety and existing comorbidities. Patients were generally satisfied with the way PSM was explained and named videos and information leaflets as tips.

Conclusions: This explorative qualitative study revealed the motivators and barriers to learning PSM. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing patients' concerns and providing adequate information. In doing so, it is important to create a supportive environment to increase patient engagement and confidence in managing their condition through PSM. These results can help to successfully implement PSM in future healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨影响患者必要自我管理教学动机与成功的因素:一项质性研究。
引言和假设:必要的自我管理(PSM)可以增加病人的自主权,并尽量减少医生咨询的数量。然而,关于PSM的实施和患者感知知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨患者对PSM的经验、意见和需求,以及如何进行教学。此外,制定标准化的使用手册。方法:采用半结构化访谈法对盆腔器官脱垂患者进行质性研究。为专题内容分析制定了初步框架。介绍了三个主要主题:关于PSM的初步意见、动机和对保健工作者和其他患者的建议。结果:访谈17例患者,其中11例行PSM, 5例拒绝行PSM, 1例不能行PSM。患者最初的意见各不相同。一半的患者对成功执行PSM有信心,而另一半患者对能够执行PSM的紧张和缺乏信心占主导地位。自主性、卫生和较少的医生咨询被认为是实施PSM的主要激励因素。不进行PSM的原因是焦虑和已有的合并症。患者普遍对PSM的解释方式感到满意,并将视频和信息传单命名为提示。结论:本探索性质的研究揭示了PSM学习的动机和障碍。我们的研究结果强调了解决患者担忧和提供充分信息的重要性。在这样做的过程中,重要的是创造一个支持性的环境,以增加患者参与和信心,通过PSM管理他们的病情。这些结果有助于在未来的医疗保健中成功实施PSM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Urogynecological Patients with Overactive Bladder. PANTHERA "Pelvic Floor Disorders in Patients Under ANtineoplastic THERApy" Prospective Evaluation of Subjectively Perceived Pelvic Floor Function in Patients with Gynecologic and Breast Cancers Undergoing Systemic Antineoplastic Therapy Using a Validated Pelvic Floor Questionnaire. Sexual Dysfunction Among Thai Women with Urinary Incontinence in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Alternatives to Synthetic Midurethral Slings in the Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Results of a National Survey. Incorporating Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome and Posterior Compartment Pelvic Organ and Rectal Prolapse : Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the International Continence Society, the International Urogynecological Association, the American Urogynecologic Society, and the American Physical Therapy Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1