Li Wang , Shao-Bin Luo , Zu-Qiang Liu , Jia-Jia Lin , Shi-Yao Chen , Yun-Shi Zhong , Yi-Qun Zhang , Wei-Feng Chen , Li-Li Ma , Jian-Wei Hu , Ming-Yan Cai , Li-Qing Yao , Quan-Lin Li , Ping-Hong Zhou
{"title":"A retrospective study on endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of ileocecal valve lesions","authors":"Li Wang , Shao-Bin Luo , Zu-Qiang Liu , Jia-Jia Lin , Shi-Yao Chen , Yun-Shi Zhong , Yi-Qun Zhang , Wei-Feng Chen , Li-Li Ma , Jian-Wei Hu , Ming-Yan Cai , Li-Qing Yao , Quan-Lin Li , Ping-Hong Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for ileocecal valve (ICV) lesions poses unique technical challenges because of its anatomic complexity. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ESD for ICV lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From December 2016 to June 2023, the clinic characteristics and outcomes of ESD on 51 ICV lesions and 84 cecal lesions were reviewed. Factors related to longer procedure time were analyzed for ESD of ICV lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics and clinical features of the lesions were not significantly different between the groups. The median procedure time of the ICV group was significantly longer than that of the cecal group (35 min vs. 24 min, respectively; <em>P</em> =.04). There were no significant differences in en bloc resection rates between the ICV and cecal groups (92.2% vs. 97.6%, respectively; <em>P</em> =.14). During the median follow-up of 32 months (IQR, 6–89), there was no case of recurrence in the ICV group. A specimen diameter of ≥25 mm and a circumferential spread of ≥1/2 were factors related to a longer procedure time (specimen diameter: OR=4.2 95%CI, 2.1–15.4, <em>P</em> =.02; circumferential spread: OR=3.7, 95%CI, 1.2–12.7, <em>P</em> =.03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ESD for ICV lesions requires a longer procedure duration than ESD for cecal lesions, but it is safe and effective, making it a challenging and promising therapeutic approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"29 6","pages":"Article 102023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for ileocecal valve (ICV) lesions poses unique technical challenges because of its anatomic complexity. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ESD for ICV lesions.
Methods
From December 2016 to June 2023, the clinic characteristics and outcomes of ESD on 51 ICV lesions and 84 cecal lesions were reviewed. Factors related to longer procedure time were analyzed for ESD of ICV lesions.
Results
Baseline characteristics and clinical features of the lesions were not significantly different between the groups. The median procedure time of the ICV group was significantly longer than that of the cecal group (35 min vs. 24 min, respectively; P =.04). There were no significant differences in en bloc resection rates between the ICV and cecal groups (92.2% vs. 97.6%, respectively; P =.14). During the median follow-up of 32 months (IQR, 6–89), there was no case of recurrence in the ICV group. A specimen diameter of ≥25 mm and a circumferential spread of ≥1/2 were factors related to a longer procedure time (specimen diameter: OR=4.2 95%CI, 2.1–15.4, P =.02; circumferential spread: OR=3.7, 95%CI, 1.2–12.7, P =.03).
Conclusion
ESD for ICV lesions requires a longer procedure duration than ESD for cecal lesions, but it is safe and effective, making it a challenging and promising therapeutic approach.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.