Accuracy of bi-coordinate and multi-coordinate handpiece calibration methods for robot-assisted implant placement

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.057
Yi Li BS , Yin Zhou DDS, PhD , Jizhe Lyu BS , Xunning Cao BS , Jianguo Tan DDS, PhD , Xiaoqiang Liu DDS, PhD
{"title":"Accuracy of bi-coordinate and multi-coordinate handpiece calibration methods for robot-assisted implant placement","authors":"Yi Li BS ,&nbsp;Yin Zhou DDS, PhD ,&nbsp;Jizhe Lyu BS ,&nbsp;Xunning Cao BS ,&nbsp;Jianguo Tan DDS, PhD ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiang Liu DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>To ensure accurate robot-assisted surgery, it is essential to identify the handpiece position at the end effector of the robotic arm. Clinically, the relationship between the optical tracking device and the handpiece has been typically confirmed by using a calibration plate at the end effector of the robotic arm. However, the accuracy of the handpiece calibration methods for robot-assisted implant placement remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of bi-coordinate and multi-coordinate handpiece calibration methods, as well as the multi-coordinate handpiece plate under partial obstruction, in the context of robot-assisted implant placement.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>In total, 120 implants were divided into 6 groups based on the calibration plate used in the study: bi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the maxilla (Bmx), bi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the mandible (Bmn), multi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the maxilla (Mmx), multi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the mandible (Mmn), partially obscured multi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the mandible with the primary coordinate unblocked and the auxiliary coordinate covered (MmnPrim), and partially obscured multi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the mandible with the auxiliary coordinate unblocked and the primary coordinate covered (MmnAux). Calibration of the robotic arm was conducted separately for each group. Then the robot autonomously performed osteotomies and implant placements at the first and second premolars according to the preoperative plan. Following surgery, the robotic software program calculated the deviation values between the planned and actual implant positions. Differences between the test groups were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni post hoc test (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ranges of angular deviation and 3-dimensional deviations at the implant platform and apex across the 6 groups were 0.30 degrees to 0.48 degrees, 0.31 to 0.36 mm, and 0.31 to 0.38 mm, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups (<em>P&gt;</em>.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both the bi-coordinate and multi-coordinate handpiece calibration methods demonstrated acceptable accuracy for robot-assisted implant placement. The multi-coordinate calibration plate provides a feasible method for robot calibration in scenarios where the mandible is partially obstructed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"134 1","pages":"Pages 188.e1-188.e10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391325002057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

To ensure accurate robot-assisted surgery, it is essential to identify the handpiece position at the end effector of the robotic arm. Clinically, the relationship between the optical tracking device and the handpiece has been typically confirmed by using a calibration plate at the end effector of the robotic arm. However, the accuracy of the handpiece calibration methods for robot-assisted implant placement remains unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of bi-coordinate and multi-coordinate handpiece calibration methods, as well as the multi-coordinate handpiece plate under partial obstruction, in the context of robot-assisted implant placement.

Material and methods

In total, 120 implants were divided into 6 groups based on the calibration plate used in the study: bi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the maxilla (Bmx), bi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the mandible (Bmn), multi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the maxilla (Mmx), multi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the mandible (Mmn), partially obscured multi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the mandible with the primary coordinate unblocked and the auxiliary coordinate covered (MmnPrim), and partially obscured multi-coordinate handpiece calibration plate for the mandible with the auxiliary coordinate unblocked and the primary coordinate covered (MmnAux). Calibration of the robotic arm was conducted separately for each group. Then the robot autonomously performed osteotomies and implant placements at the first and second premolars according to the preoperative plan. Following surgery, the robotic software program calculated the deviation values between the planned and actual implant positions. Differences between the test groups were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni post hoc test (α=.05).

Results

The ranges of angular deviation and 3-dimensional deviations at the implant platform and apex across the 6 groups were 0.30 degrees to 0.48 degrees, 0.31 to 0.36 mm, and 0.31 to 0.38 mm, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups (P>.05).

Conclusions

Both the bi-coordinate and multi-coordinate handpiece calibration methods demonstrated acceptable accuracy for robot-assisted implant placement. The multi-coordinate calibration plate provides a feasible method for robot calibration in scenarios where the mandible is partially obstructed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助植入体双坐标和多坐标机头标定方法的精度。
问题说明:为了确保机器人辅助手术的准确性,确定机头在机械臂末端执行器的位置是至关重要的。临床上,光学跟踪装置和机头之间的关系通常是通过在机械臂末端执行器上使用校准板来确认的。然而,用于机器人辅助植入物放置的手机校准方法的准确性仍然不清楚。目的:本体外研究的目的是评估双坐标和多坐标机头校准方法的准确性,以及部分阻塞下多坐标机头板在机器人辅助植入下的准确性。材料和方法:120个种植体根据研究中使用的校准板分为6组:上颌骨双坐标手机定标板(Bmx)、下颌骨双坐标手机定标板(Bmn)、上颌骨多坐标手机定标板(Mmx)、下颌骨多坐标手机定标板(Mmn)、主坐标未遮挡、辅助坐标遮挡的下颌骨部分遮挡多坐标手机定标板(MmnPrim);部分遮挡的下颌骨多坐标机头标定板,辅助坐标未遮挡,主坐标被遮挡(MmnAux)。每组分别对机械臂进行标定。然后,机器人根据术前计划自主进行第一、第二前臼齿截骨和种植体放置。手术后,机器人软件程序计算计划和实际种植体位置之间的偏差值。各组间差异分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Bonferroni事后检验(α= 0.05)。结果:6组种植体平台和尖端的角度偏差和三维偏差范围分别为0.30°~ 0.48°、0.31 ~ 0.36 mm和0.31 ~ 0.38 mm。各组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:双坐标和多坐标机头校准方法在机器人辅助种植体放置时均具有可接受的精度。多坐标标定板为下颌骨部分遮挡情况下的机器人标定提供了一种可行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor regarding, "Evaluation of the effects of the small intestine submucosa biological membrane on guided bone regeneration and early loading of dental implants in the maxillary anterior region: A randomized controlled trial". LEGO-modified mounting plates to mount 3D printed casts on dental articulators. Response to Letter to the Editor regarding, "Evaluation of the effects of the small intestine submucosa biological membrane on guided bone regeneration and early loading of dental implants in the maxillary anterior region: A randomized controlled trial". Robot-assisted immediate implant placement with the socket shield technique in the esthetic zone: A prospective 10-patient series. Internal fit and marginal adaptation of digitally fabricated interim fixed dental prostheses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1