Risk factors and prevalence of medical device-related pressure injuries in pediatric intensive care.

Müge Seval, Emine Uzuntarla Güney, Tülay Kuzlu Ayyıldız, Nazife Şirin Kuzlu Alkan
{"title":"Risk factors and prevalence of medical device-related pressure injuries in pediatric intensive care.","authors":"Müge Seval, Emine Uzuntarla Güney, Tülay Kuzlu Ayyıldız, Nazife Şirin Kuzlu Alkan","doi":"10.1016/j.pedn.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the incidence of pressure injuries (PI) in patients connected to medical devices during their treatment in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), the risk factors, and the most accurate scale that assesses PI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study adhering to STROBE guidelines. It was carried out with 70 children connected to medical devices during their treatment in the PICU between 12.01.2023 and 06.30.2024. The PI development risk statuses of the patients associated with medical devices were evaluated using the Braden Q Scale, the BUCH Scale, the Glamorgan Pediatric PI Risk Assessment Scale, and an Injury Monitoring Form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDPI) in the PICU was 12.8 %. MDPI developed the most frequently in the nasal and oral regions, and 61.5 % of these injuries were Stage 1. The equipment with the highest rates of contribution to PI included nasogastric tubes, orogastric feeding equipment, and oral intubation tubes. The Braden Q, BUCH, and Glamorgan Scales had AUC values of 0.91, 0.83, and 0.80, sensitivity values of 77 %, 77 %, and 66 %, and specificity values of 82 %, 69 %, and 62 %, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study highlight that medical devices used to support the recovery of critically ill children in the PICU pose a significant risk for PI development.</p><p><strong>Implications for clinical practice: </strong>Determining incidence and risk factors is important to prevent PI. Appropriate protocols, interventions, and strategies can be developed to manage the identified MDPI risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2025.03.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the incidence of pressure injuries (PI) in patients connected to medical devices during their treatment in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), the risk factors, and the most accurate scale that assesses PI.

Methods: A cross-sectional study adhering to STROBE guidelines. It was carried out with 70 children connected to medical devices during their treatment in the PICU between 12.01.2023 and 06.30.2024. The PI development risk statuses of the patients associated with medical devices were evaluated using the Braden Q Scale, the BUCH Scale, the Glamorgan Pediatric PI Risk Assessment Scale, and an Injury Monitoring Form.

Results: The incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDPI) in the PICU was 12.8 %. MDPI developed the most frequently in the nasal and oral regions, and 61.5 % of these injuries were Stage 1. The equipment with the highest rates of contribution to PI included nasogastric tubes, orogastric feeding equipment, and oral intubation tubes. The Braden Q, BUCH, and Glamorgan Scales had AUC values of 0.91, 0.83, and 0.80, sensitivity values of 77 %, 77 %, and 66 %, and specificity values of 82 %, 69 %, and 62 %, respectively.

Conclusions: The results of this study highlight that medical devices used to support the recovery of critically ill children in the PICU pose a significant risk for PI development.

Implications for clinical practice: Determining incidence and risk factors is important to prevent PI. Appropriate protocols, interventions, and strategies can be developed to manage the identified MDPI risk factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society (PENS) The Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families (JPN) is interested in publishing evidence-based practice, quality improvement, theory, and research papers on a variety of topics from US and international authors. JPN is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society. Cecily L. Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN is the Founder and Editor in Chief. Journal content covers the life span from birth to adolescence. Submissions should be pertinent to the nursing care needs of healthy and ill infants, children, and adolescents, addressing their biopsychosocial needs. JPN also features the following regular columns for which authors may submit brief papers: Hot Topics and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Applying the DASA-YV for aggression risk reduction in pediatric acute care. Risk factors and prevalence of medical device-related pressure injuries in pediatric intensive care. Treating anxiety in pediatric primary care: A case report Family management of common sleep disturbances among children with autism: Implications for pediatric nursing research and practice The impact of COVID-19 during the first two years: Giving voice to pediatric nurses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1