Joel Chee Yee Chan, Rehena Sultana, Deepak Mathur, Chin Wen Tan, Ban Leong Sng
{"title":"The association of pain and psychological vulnerabilities with postpartum pain catastrophizing: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Joel Chee Yee Chan, Rehena Sultana, Deepak Mathur, Chin Wen Tan, Ban Leong Sng","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02920-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pain catastrophizing is an amplified negative thought process that emerges during actual or perceived pain moments. There is limited information on the role of labour pain in the development of pain catastrophizing during the postpartum period. We sought to investigate whether labour pain, pain, and psychological vulnerabilities are associated with high pain catastrophizing (defined as a Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS] ≥ 25) at 6-10 weeks postpartum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial that recruited pregnant individuals at term prior to labour and delivery. Participants filled in the predelivery questionnaires on labour pain, pain, and psychological vulnerabilities upon written consent. The recruited parturients also completed an online survey 6-10 weeks postpartum to determine the status of pain catastrophizing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 820 parturients who completed the postpartum online survey, 116 (14.4%) were high pain catastrophizing. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that greater enormity of labour pain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.06), choosing nonepidural over epidural analgesia (aOR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.91), having a family history of other mental disorders (aOR, 31.3; 95% CI, 5.7 to 173.7), greater predelivery pain catastrophizing (aOR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.68 to 4.36), greater predelivery activity avoidance (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.09), and greater predelivery state anxiety (aOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.05) were associated with postpartum pain catastrophizing at 6-10 weeks postpartum. Having greater infant weight was protective against the risk of postpartum pain catastrophizing (aOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.78). The area under the curve of the generated multivariable model was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predelivery pain and psychological vulnerabilities were associated with postpartum pain catastrophizing among healthy parturients undergoing labour. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether such risk factors can allow earlier intervention to reduce pain catastrophizing.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03167905 ); first submitted 30 May 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02920-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Pain catastrophizing is an amplified negative thought process that emerges during actual or perceived pain moments. There is limited information on the role of labour pain in the development of pain catastrophizing during the postpartum period. We sought to investigate whether labour pain, pain, and psychological vulnerabilities are associated with high pain catastrophizing (defined as a Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS] ≥ 25) at 6-10 weeks postpartum.
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial that recruited pregnant individuals at term prior to labour and delivery. Participants filled in the predelivery questionnaires on labour pain, pain, and psychological vulnerabilities upon written consent. The recruited parturients also completed an online survey 6-10 weeks postpartum to determine the status of pain catastrophizing.
Results: Among the 820 parturients who completed the postpartum online survey, 116 (14.4%) were high pain catastrophizing. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that greater enormity of labour pain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.06), choosing nonepidural over epidural analgesia (aOR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.91), having a family history of other mental disorders (aOR, 31.3; 95% CI, 5.7 to 173.7), greater predelivery pain catastrophizing (aOR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.68 to 4.36), greater predelivery activity avoidance (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.09), and greater predelivery state anxiety (aOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.05) were associated with postpartum pain catastrophizing at 6-10 weeks postpartum. Having greater infant weight was protective against the risk of postpartum pain catastrophizing (aOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.78). The area under the curve of the generated multivariable model was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.86).
Conclusion: Predelivery pain and psychological vulnerabilities were associated with postpartum pain catastrophizing among healthy parturients undergoing labour. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether such risk factors can allow earlier intervention to reduce pain catastrophizing.
Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03167905 ); first submitted 30 May 2017.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’
Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the
first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened
considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published
monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article
types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences
articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing
professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content,
according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain,
perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines
and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French,
according to the language of submission.