Can We Optimize Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening by Combined Risk Score Analysis?

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114544
Emma Banwell MD , Daniel York MD , Sravanthi Vegunta MD , Carrie Torr MD , Bradley A. Yoder MD
{"title":"Can We Optimize Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening by Combined Risk Score Analysis?","authors":"Emma Banwell MD ,&nbsp;Daniel York MD ,&nbsp;Sravanthi Vegunta MD ,&nbsp;Carrie Torr MD ,&nbsp;Bradley A. Yoder MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate a composite metric incorporating the DIGIROP-Birth (DRB) and Neonatal Research Network Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Outcome Estimator (NRN-BPD) for predicting severe retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment (TR-ROP).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study of 990 infants born prematurely undergoing dilated eye examinations between January 2010 and August 2023. We performed a chart review to assess a primary outcome of TR-ROP and secondary outcome of stage 2 or greater ROP. DRB and 14-day NRN-BPD scores were quantified for each infant, and optimal thresholds for predicting TR-ROP were analyzed using receiver operator characteristic curves. Sensitivity and specificity for TR-ROP were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 990 infants, 364 (36.8%) had stage 2 or greater ROP and 68 (6.9%) had TR-ROP. Receiver operator characteristic analysis with (95% CI) showed areas under the curve of 0.867 (0.829-0.906) for DRB and 0.845 (0.809-0.881) for NRN-BPD. Optimal cutoff scores were 1.7 for DRB and 40% for NRN-BPD with respective sensitivities of 97% and 96%. Composite screening for babies meeting either cutoff allowed 100% sensitivity for predicting TR-ROP while decreasing number of infants qualifying for screening from 990 to 562 (43% reduction).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A composite metric using DigiROP-Birth and NRN-BPD Outcome Estimator scores may allow an early, simple approach to predict TR-ROP with 100% sensitivity yet allow significant reduction in the number of infants requiring screening eye examinations. Additional large validation studies are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 114544"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347625000848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate a composite metric incorporating the DIGIROP-Birth (DRB) and Neonatal Research Network Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Outcome Estimator (NRN-BPD) for predicting severe retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment (TR-ROP).

Study design

This was a retrospective cohort study of 990 infants born prematurely undergoing dilated eye examinations between January 2010 and August 2023. We performed a chart review to assess a primary outcome of TR-ROP and secondary outcome of stage 2 or greater ROP. DRB and 14-day NRN-BPD scores were quantified for each infant, and optimal thresholds for predicting TR-ROP were analyzed using receiver operator characteristic curves. Sensitivity and specificity for TR-ROP were assessed.

Results

Of the 990 infants, 364 (36.8%) had stage 2 or greater ROP and 68 (6.9%) had TR-ROP. Receiver operator characteristic analysis with (95% CI) showed areas under the curve of 0.867 (0.829-0.906) for DRB and 0.845 (0.809-0.881) for NRN-BPD. Optimal cutoff scores were 1.7 for DRB and 40% for NRN-BPD with respective sensitivities of 97% and 96%. Composite screening for babies meeting either cutoff allowed 100% sensitivity for predicting TR-ROP while decreasing number of infants qualifying for screening from 990 to 562 (43% reduction).

Conclusions

A composite metric using DigiROP-Birth and NRN-BPD Outcome Estimator scores may allow an early, simple approach to predict TR-ROP with 100% sensitivity yet allow significant reduction in the number of infants requiring screening eye examinations. Additional large validation studies are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合风险评分分析能优化早产儿视网膜病变筛查吗?
目的:评价结合DIGIROP-Birth (DRB)和新生儿研究网络BPD结果估计器(NRN BPD)的复合指标预测需要治疗的严重早产儿视网膜病变(TR-ROP)的效果。研究设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,990名早产儿在2010年1月至2023年8月期间接受了扩张性眼科检查。我们进行了图表回顾,以评估TR-ROP的主要结局,以及2期或更严重ROP的次要结局。量化每个婴儿的DRB和14天NRN-BPD评分,并使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析预测TR-ROP的最佳阈值。评估TR-ROP的敏感性和特异性。结果:990例患儿中,364例(36.8%)为2期及以上ROP, 68例(6.9%)为TR-ROP。ROC分析(95% CI)显示DRB的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.867 (0.829-0.906),NRN-BPD的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.845(0.809-0.881)。DRB和NRN-BPD的最佳临界值分别为1.7和40%,敏感性分别为97%和96%。对符合任何一个临界值的婴儿进行综合筛查,预测TR-ROP的灵敏度为100%,同时将符合筛查条件的婴儿数量从990减少到562(减少43%)。结论:使用DigiROP-Birth和NRN BPD Outcome Estimator评分的复合指标可以提供一种早期、简单的方法,以100%的灵敏度预测TR-ROP,但可以显著减少需要筛查眼睛检查的婴儿数量。需要更多的大型验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatrics
Journal of Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
696
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy. Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to: General Pediatrics Pediatric Subspecialties Adolescent Medicine Allergy and Immunology Cardiology Critical Care Medicine Developmental-Behavioral Medicine Endocrinology Gastroenterology Hematology-Oncology Infectious Diseases Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Emergency Medicine Pulmonology Rheumatology Genetics Ethics Health Service Research Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Predictive Modeling of Childhood Disease Severity in a Telemedicine Service: Evidence from the INACT Studies in Haiti. Reduced-Dose Computed Tomography vs Multi-View Radiographs in Pediatric Foreign Body Aspiration. Neonatal Sepsis from 2014-2024: The Resurgence of Gram-Negative Rods. Large Language Models for Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Parenting Intervention in Pediatric Primary Care Promotes Child Mental Health: Evidence from A Randomized Controlled Trial of PlayReadVIP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1