Emma Banwell, Daniel York, Sravanthi Vegunta, Carrie Torr, Bradley A Yoder
{"title":"Can We Optimize Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening by Combined Risk Score Analysis?","authors":"Emma Banwell, Daniel York, Sravanthi Vegunta, Carrie Torr, Bradley A Yoder","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate a composite metric incorporating the DIGIROP-Birth (DRB) and Neonatal Research Network BPD Outcome Estimator (NRN BPD) for predicting severe retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment (TR-ROP).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of 990 infants born prematurely undergoing dilated eye exams between January 2010 and August, 2023. We performed a chart review to assess a primary outcome of TR-ROP, and secondary outcome of stage 2 or greater ROP. DRB and 14-day NRN-BPD scores were quantified for each infant, and optimal thresholds for predicting TR-ROP were analyzed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Sensitivity and specificity for TR-ROP were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 990 infants, 364 (36.8%) had stage 2 or greater ROP and 68 (6.9%) had TR-ROP. ROC analysis with (95% CI) showed areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.867 (0.829-0.906) for DRB and 0.845 (0.809-0.881) for NRN-BPD. Optimal cutoff scores were 1.7 for DRB and 40% for NRN-BPD with respective sensitivities of 97% and 96%. Composite screening for babies meeting either cutoff allowed 100% sensitivity for predicting TR-ROP while decreasing number of infants qualifying for screening from 990 to 562 (43% reduction).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A composite metric using DigiROP-Birth and NRN BPD Outcome Estimator scores may allow an early, simple approach to predict TR-ROP with 100% sensitivity, yet allow significant reduction in the number of infants requiring screening eye exams. Additional large validation studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"114544"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a composite metric incorporating the DIGIROP-Birth (DRB) and Neonatal Research Network BPD Outcome Estimator (NRN BPD) for predicting severe retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment (TR-ROP).
Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of 990 infants born prematurely undergoing dilated eye exams between January 2010 and August, 2023. We performed a chart review to assess a primary outcome of TR-ROP, and secondary outcome of stage 2 or greater ROP. DRB and 14-day NRN-BPD scores were quantified for each infant, and optimal thresholds for predicting TR-ROP were analyzed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Sensitivity and specificity for TR-ROP were assessed.
Results: Of the 990 infants, 364 (36.8%) had stage 2 or greater ROP and 68 (6.9%) had TR-ROP. ROC analysis with (95% CI) showed areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.867 (0.829-0.906) for DRB and 0.845 (0.809-0.881) for NRN-BPD. Optimal cutoff scores were 1.7 for DRB and 40% for NRN-BPD with respective sensitivities of 97% and 96%. Composite screening for babies meeting either cutoff allowed 100% sensitivity for predicting TR-ROP while decreasing number of infants qualifying for screening from 990 to 562 (43% reduction).
Conclusions: A composite metric using DigiROP-Birth and NRN BPD Outcome Estimator scores may allow an early, simple approach to predict TR-ROP with 100% sensitivity, yet allow significant reduction in the number of infants requiring screening eye exams. Additional large validation studies are needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy.
Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to:
General Pediatrics
Pediatric Subspecialties
Adolescent Medicine
Allergy and Immunology
Cardiology
Critical Care Medicine
Developmental-Behavioral Medicine
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Hematology-Oncology
Infectious Diseases
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Pulmonology
Rheumatology
Genetics
Ethics
Health Service Research
Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.