Jan-Niklas Eckardt, Ishan Srivastava, Zizhe Wang, Susann Winter, Tim Schmittmann, Sebastian Riechert, Miriam Eva Helena Gediga, Anas Shekh Sulaiman, Martin M. K. Schneider, Freya Schulze, Christian Thiede, Katja Sockel, Frank Kroschinsky, Christoph Röllig, Martin Bornhäuser, Karsten Wendt, Jan Moritz Middeke
{"title":"Synthetic bone marrow images augment real samples in developing acute myeloid leukemia microscopy classification models","authors":"Jan-Niklas Eckardt, Ishan Srivastava, Zizhe Wang, Susann Winter, Tim Schmittmann, Sebastian Riechert, Miriam Eva Helena Gediga, Anas Shekh Sulaiman, Martin M. K. Schneider, Freya Schulze, Christian Thiede, Katja Sockel, Frank Kroschinsky, Christoph Röllig, Martin Bornhäuser, Karsten Wendt, Jan Moritz Middeke","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01563-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>High-quality image data is essential for training deep learning (DL) classifiers, yet data sharing is often limited by privacy concerns. We hypothesized that generative adversarial networks (GANs) could synthesize bone marrow smear (BMS) images suitable for classifier training. BMS from 1251 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 51 patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), and 236 stem cell donors were digitized, and synthetic images were generated using StyleGAN2-Ada. In a blinded visual Turing test, eight hematologists achieved 63% accuracy in identifying synthetic images, confirming high image quality. DL classifiers trained on real data achieved AUROCs of 0.99 across AML, APL, and donor classifications, with performance remaining above 0.95 even when incrementally substituting real data for synthetic samples. Adding synthetic data to real training data offered performance gains for an exceptionally rare disease (APL). Our study demonstrates the usability of synthetic BMS data for training highly accurate image classifiers in microscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01563-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High-quality image data is essential for training deep learning (DL) classifiers, yet data sharing is often limited by privacy concerns. We hypothesized that generative adversarial networks (GANs) could synthesize bone marrow smear (BMS) images suitable for classifier training. BMS from 1251 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 51 patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), and 236 stem cell donors were digitized, and synthetic images were generated using StyleGAN2-Ada. In a blinded visual Turing test, eight hematologists achieved 63% accuracy in identifying synthetic images, confirming high image quality. DL classifiers trained on real data achieved AUROCs of 0.99 across AML, APL, and donor classifications, with performance remaining above 0.95 even when incrementally substituting real data for synthetic samples. Adding synthetic data to real training data offered performance gains for an exceptionally rare disease (APL). Our study demonstrates the usability of synthetic BMS data for training highly accurate image classifiers in microscopy.
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.