{"title":"Evaluation of long-term bond strength and mechanical properties of a recently launched light-cure resin cement for veneer cementation.","authors":"Hong Zhang, Yuan Yuan, Yu Toida, Papichaya Intajak, Hidehiko Sano, Atsushi Tomokiyo","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06269-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the initial and six-month bonding performance and mechanical properties of a recently launched light-cure resin cement compared to light-cure, dual-cure resin cements, and resin composite used for veneer cementation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four luting cements-Panavia Veneer LC (PVL), Variolink Esthetic LC (VEL), Panavia V5 (PV5), and Clearfil AP-X (APX)-were tested for microtensile bond strength (μTBS), Knoop hardness (KHN), degree of conversion (DC), and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) at 24-hour and 6-month. All values were subjected to statistical analysis (α = 0.05). Fracture mode and resin-dentin interfaces were observed via SEM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences among the materials for each measured property at 24-hour and 6-month (p < 0.001). The PVL group demonstrated superior bond strength at both time points (24-hour: 58.72 MPa; 6-month: 59.13 MPa), comparable to APX. In contrast, the VEL group showed a significant decrease in μTBS from 24-hour (27.62 MPa) to 6-month (10.65 MPa) (p < 0.001). The dual-cure cement PV5 showed marked improvements in μTBS and mechanical properties beyond 24 h (p < 0.001). KHN and UTS were highest in APX. PVL and APX had higher DC values than VEL and PV5. SEM revealed variations in resin-dentin interfaces across the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PVL demonstrated reliable and durable bonding performance, while PV5 showed improvements after 24 h, suggesting the need for extended curing time for optimal performance.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>PVL provides durable bonding and mechanical performance, making it a promising option for veneer cementation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 4","pages":"199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06269-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the initial and six-month bonding performance and mechanical properties of a recently launched light-cure resin cement compared to light-cure, dual-cure resin cements, and resin composite used for veneer cementation.
Materials and methods: Four luting cements-Panavia Veneer LC (PVL), Variolink Esthetic LC (VEL), Panavia V5 (PV5), and Clearfil AP-X (APX)-were tested for microtensile bond strength (μTBS), Knoop hardness (KHN), degree of conversion (DC), and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) at 24-hour and 6-month. All values were subjected to statistical analysis (α = 0.05). Fracture mode and resin-dentin interfaces were observed via SEM.
Results: One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences among the materials for each measured property at 24-hour and 6-month (p < 0.001). The PVL group demonstrated superior bond strength at both time points (24-hour: 58.72 MPa; 6-month: 59.13 MPa), comparable to APX. In contrast, the VEL group showed a significant decrease in μTBS from 24-hour (27.62 MPa) to 6-month (10.65 MPa) (p < 0.001). The dual-cure cement PV5 showed marked improvements in μTBS and mechanical properties beyond 24 h (p < 0.001). KHN and UTS were highest in APX. PVL and APX had higher DC values than VEL and PV5. SEM revealed variations in resin-dentin interfaces across the groups.
Conclusions: PVL demonstrated reliable and durable bonding performance, while PV5 showed improvements after 24 h, suggesting the need for extended curing time for optimal performance.
Clinical relevance: PVL provides durable bonding and mechanical performance, making it a promising option for veneer cementation in clinical practice.
Shraddha Hegde, G. Kumar, C. Engle, T. Hanson, Luke A. Roy, Jonathan van Senten, Jeffrey C. Johnson, Jimmy L. Avery, Suja Aarattuthodi, Sunni Dahl, L. Dorman, Mark Peterman
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.