Amaryllis Rivera-Santiago, Francisco Diez-Gonzalez
{"title":"Combination of Blue Light and Chemical Sanitizers for Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes Dried Cells on Inert Surfaces.","authors":"Amaryllis Rivera-Santiago, Francisco Diez-Gonzalez","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental contamination of ready-to-eat (RTE) foods with Listeria monocytogenes is a major food safety concern. Treatment of surfaces with antimicrobial blue light (aBL) has recently emerged as a technology that can supplement current sanitation practices. Chemical sanitizers are used extensively by the food industry, but their combination with aBL at 405 nm has not been evaluated. This project was undertaken to determine the combined effect of sanitizers with aBL to inactivate L. monocytogenes dried cells on inert surfaces. Peracetic acid (PAA), benzalkonium chloride (BAC), and sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) at time/concentrations that delivered less than 2 Log CFU viability reductions were combined with limited aBL treatments applied simultaneously or sequential on cells dried on stainless steel (SS) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coupons. When five-strain mixtures were dried on SS and treated with aBL alone (575 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) average viability reductions of less than 2 Log CFU/coupon were observed. Single treatments with NaClO (20 ppm, 60 min) and PAA (30 ppm, 30 min) caused less than 1.5 Log CFU/coupon inactivation on SS. During independent experiments that combined the same concentration/time of NaClO and PAA applied simultaneously with the above aBL dose, viability reductions of 5.4 and 4.7 Log CFU/coupon, respectively, were measured. The results of sequential treatments of dried cells with sanitizers and aBL were variable depending on the sanitizer, concentration, surface and the sequence order. Measured reductions of sequential treatments varied from 1.5 Log CFU/coupon with BAC (40 ppm/30 min) to 5.5 Log CFU/coupon with NaClO (75 ppm/60 min) applied before aBL on PTFE. The comparison between the results obtained at low sanitizer concentrations simultaneously used with aBL to the sum of the single results (3.5 vs. 5.4 Log CFU/coupon or 3.5 vs. 4.7 Log CFU/coupon) resulted in statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). These findings suggested that there was a synergistic effect between sanitizers and aBL.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental contamination of ready-to-eat (RTE) foods with Listeria monocytogenes is a major food safety concern. Treatment of surfaces with antimicrobial blue light (aBL) has recently emerged as a technology that can supplement current sanitation practices. Chemical sanitizers are used extensively by the food industry, but their combination with aBL at 405 nm has not been evaluated. This project was undertaken to determine the combined effect of sanitizers with aBL to inactivate L. monocytogenes dried cells on inert surfaces. Peracetic acid (PAA), benzalkonium chloride (BAC), and sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) at time/concentrations that delivered less than 2 Log CFU viability reductions were combined with limited aBL treatments applied simultaneously or sequential on cells dried on stainless steel (SS) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coupons. When five-strain mixtures were dried on SS and treated with aBL alone (575 J/cm2) average viability reductions of less than 2 Log CFU/coupon were observed. Single treatments with NaClO (20 ppm, 60 min) and PAA (30 ppm, 30 min) caused less than 1.5 Log CFU/coupon inactivation on SS. During independent experiments that combined the same concentration/time of NaClO and PAA applied simultaneously with the above aBL dose, viability reductions of 5.4 and 4.7 Log CFU/coupon, respectively, were measured. The results of sequential treatments of dried cells with sanitizers and aBL were variable depending on the sanitizer, concentration, surface and the sequence order. Measured reductions of sequential treatments varied from 1.5 Log CFU/coupon with BAC (40 ppm/30 min) to 5.5 Log CFU/coupon with NaClO (75 ppm/60 min) applied before aBL on PTFE. The comparison between the results obtained at low sanitizer concentrations simultaneously used with aBL to the sum of the single results (3.5 vs. 5.4 Log CFU/coupon or 3.5 vs. 4.7 Log CFU/coupon) resulted in statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). These findings suggested that there was a synergistic effect between sanitizers and aBL.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.