Pooled analysis of oral vinorelbine as single agents in patients with advanced NSCLC.

IF 0.7 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Lung Cancer Management Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1080/17581966.2025.2477418
Christos Chouaid, Francesco Grossi, Christine Ta Thanh Minh, Romain Raymond, Joaquim Bosch-Barrera
{"title":"Pooled analysis of oral vinorelbine as single agents in patients with advanced NSCLC.","authors":"Christos Chouaid, Francesco Grossi, Christine Ta Thanh Minh, Romain Raymond, Joaquim Bosch-Barrera","doi":"10.1080/17581966.2025.2477418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This was a pooled analysis of data from weekly vinorelbine (VNR) treatment arms of four individual open-label, phase II studies to assess and refine the efficacy and tolerance of weekly oral VNR in a larger cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients included in this pooled analysis received oral VNR at the dose of 60 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly at cycle 1 (3-week cycle), followed by an increase to 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly for subsequent cycles until disease progression or toxicity. Efficacy was based on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 247 patients were included. The ORR and DCR were 8.9% and 57.5% respectively, median PFS and OS were 3.3 and 8.5 months, respectively. Less than half (40.7%) of patients reported ≥1 serious AE (regardless of causality), with 12.3% reporting ≥1 treatment-related serious AE (grade ≥3: 11.1%). The most reported grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (5.8%), and decreased appetite (4.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pooled analysis showed that weekly oral VRN is a valid option, with an acceptable safety profile, in this population of patients with advanced NSCLC, confirming results from previous individual studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"2477418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581966.2025.2477418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This was a pooled analysis of data from weekly vinorelbine (VNR) treatment arms of four individual open-label, phase II studies to assess and refine the efficacy and tolerance of weekly oral VNR in a larger cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Materials and methods: All patients included in this pooled analysis received oral VNR at the dose of 60 mg/m2 weekly at cycle 1 (3-week cycle), followed by an increase to 80 mg/m2 weekly for subsequent cycles until disease progression or toxicity. Efficacy was based on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR).

Results: A total of 247 patients were included. The ORR and DCR were 8.9% and 57.5% respectively, median PFS and OS were 3.3 and 8.5 months, respectively. Less than half (40.7%) of patients reported ≥1 serious AE (regardless of causality), with 12.3% reporting ≥1 treatment-related serious AE (grade ≥3: 11.1%). The most reported grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (5.8%), and decreased appetite (4.9%).

Conclusion: This pooled analysis showed that weekly oral VRN is a valid option, with an acceptable safety profile, in this population of patients with advanced NSCLC, confirming results from previous individual studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期 NSCLC 患者口服长春瑞滨单药的汇总分析。
研究目的这是对四项单独的开放标签II期研究中每周一次长春瑞滨(VNR)治疗组的数据进行的汇总分析,目的是在更大的晚期NSCLC患者队列中评估和完善每周口服VNR的疗效和耐受性:所有纳入本汇总分析的患者均在第一周期(3 周周期)接受每周 60 毫克/平方米剂量的口服 VNR,之后的周期剂量增至每周 80 毫克/平方米,直至疾病进展或出现毒性反应。疗效基于客观反应率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和疾病控制率(DCR):结果:共纳入 247 例患者。ORR和DCR分别为8.9%和57.5%,中位PFS和OS分别为3.3个月和8.5个月。不到一半(40.7%)的患者报告了≥1次严重AE(无论因果关系),其中12.3%的患者报告了≥1次与治疗相关的严重AE(≥3级:11.1%)。报告最多的≥3级AE为中性粒细胞减少(17.6%)、疲劳(5.8%)和食欲下降(4.9%):这项汇总分析表明,在晚期NSCLC患者中,每周口服VRN是一种有效的选择,其安全性是可以接受的,这也证实了之前个别研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lung Cancer Management
Lung Cancer Management RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Oncogenic ALK fusion in rare subtype of small intestine metastasis from occult lung cancer. Pooled analysis of oral vinorelbine as single agents in patients with advanced NSCLC. The association between blood-based HYAL2 methylation and early-stage lung cancer: a case-control study. Lung cancer screening in limited resource regions: the 3rd Brazilian Early Lung Cancer Trial (BRELT3/mobile ProPulmão). Negative social determinants of health are linked to lung cancer screening underutilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1