Regional Growth in US Neonatal Intensive Care Capacity and Mortality, 1991-2020

IF 24.7 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS JAMA Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.7133
Gwenyth M. Gasper, Patrick M. Stuchlik, Therese A. Stukel, David C. Goodman
{"title":"Regional Growth in US Neonatal Intensive Care Capacity and Mortality, 1991-2020","authors":"Gwenyth M. Gasper, Patrick M. Stuchlik, Therese A. Stukel, David C. Goodman","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.7133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceThe effectiveness of neonatal intensive care in very ill newborns has led to rapid growth in US neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) capacity that is uncorrelated with regional perinatal risk. It is not known if there is an association between growth of regional capacity and newborn mortality.ObjectiveTo estimate the association between change in NICU capacity and neonatal mortality across 246 neonatal intensive care regions.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this repeated cross-sectional study of US infants, the association between change in regional capacity and mortality was estimated in the years 1991, 2003, 2007, 2012, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 using Poisson generalized estimating equations models adjusted for maternal and newborn characteristics, with newborns as the units of analysis. Data were analyzed June 30, 2024. This study used a 25% sample of all US infants born live with a birth weight of 400 g or more and gestational age of between 22 and less than 45 weeks (N = 30 902 221 newborns).ExposureChange in regional NICU capacity, measured as both counts of neonatologists and staffed NICU beds per 1000 live births (LBs) from 1991 to the birth year.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was neonatal (&amp;amp;lt;28 days) mortality and the secondary outcome was 180-day mortality.ResultsFrom 1991-2020, total adjusted neonatologists and NICU beds per 1000 LBs increased from 0.44 to 1.44 (227%) and 5.43 to 8.02 (48%), respectively, while neonatal mortality decreased from 3.87 to 2.21 (−43%) and 180-day mortality decreased from 6.27 to 3.19 (−49%) per 1000 LBs. There was no meaningful correlation between change in regional capacity (neonatologists: <jats:italic>r</jats:italic>, −0.12; 95% CI, −0.25 to 0.00; NICU beds: <jats:italic>r</jats:italic>, −0.07; 95% CI, −0.19 to 0.06) and change in regional neonatal mortality. No meaningful associations with capacity were observed in multilevel models (neonatologists: adjusted relative rate [aRR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01; NICU beds: aRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00) nor was 180-day mortality associated with capacity. No associations were observed in birth cohorts stratified by relative need based on gestational age, maternal education, or maternal race or ethnicity.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study, growth in regional NICU capacity was not associated with observable mortality benefit. Additional studies are needed to investigate the costs and benefits associated with NICU care expansion.","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.7133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceThe effectiveness of neonatal intensive care in very ill newborns has led to rapid growth in US neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) capacity that is uncorrelated with regional perinatal risk. It is not known if there is an association between growth of regional capacity and newborn mortality.ObjectiveTo estimate the association between change in NICU capacity and neonatal mortality across 246 neonatal intensive care regions.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this repeated cross-sectional study of US infants, the association between change in regional capacity and mortality was estimated in the years 1991, 2003, 2007, 2012, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 using Poisson generalized estimating equations models adjusted for maternal and newborn characteristics, with newborns as the units of analysis. Data were analyzed June 30, 2024. This study used a 25% sample of all US infants born live with a birth weight of 400 g or more and gestational age of between 22 and less than 45 weeks (N = 30 902 221 newborns).ExposureChange in regional NICU capacity, measured as both counts of neonatologists and staffed NICU beds per 1000 live births (LBs) from 1991 to the birth year.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was neonatal (&amp;lt;28 days) mortality and the secondary outcome was 180-day mortality.ResultsFrom 1991-2020, total adjusted neonatologists and NICU beds per 1000 LBs increased from 0.44 to 1.44 (227%) and 5.43 to 8.02 (48%), respectively, while neonatal mortality decreased from 3.87 to 2.21 (−43%) and 180-day mortality decreased from 6.27 to 3.19 (−49%) per 1000 LBs. There was no meaningful correlation between change in regional capacity (neonatologists: r, −0.12; 95% CI, −0.25 to 0.00; NICU beds: r, −0.07; 95% CI, −0.19 to 0.06) and change in regional neonatal mortality. No meaningful associations with capacity were observed in multilevel models (neonatologists: adjusted relative rate [aRR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01; NICU beds: aRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00) nor was 180-day mortality associated with capacity. No associations were observed in birth cohorts stratified by relative need based on gestational age, maternal education, or maternal race or ethnicity.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study, growth in regional NICU capacity was not associated with observable mortality benefit. Additional studies are needed to investigate the costs and benefits associated with NICU care expansion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Ethics in the Age of Consortia Neural Development, Music Therapy, and Active Noise Control in the NICU—No Preterm Neonate Needs Mozart Regional Growth in US Neonatal Intensive Care Capacity and Mortality, 1991-2020 Age-Specific Trends in Pediatric and Adult Firearm Homicide After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic FDA Approval of Cardiac Valve Devices Implanted in a National Cohort of Pediatric Patients, 2016-2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1