Zhijun Tian , Yanfeng Liu , Yaowen Chen , Cong Song , Dengjia Wang
{"title":"Description of liquid–vapor transition behaviors in evaporative cooling technologies: A critical review","authors":"Zhijun Tian , Yanfeng Liu , Yaowen Chen , Cong Song , Dengjia Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaporative cooling technology benefits from the substantial latent heat released during the liquid–vapor phase transition process. A comprehensive understanding of the physical nature of phase transition is fundamental to this technology. This review provides an analysis of the theoretical foundations of the liquid–vapor transition, drawing on thermodynamics, kinetic theory, and relevant practical formulas. Additionally, the pertinent knowledge of hydrodynamics, particularly the description of vapor transport, is summarized. Subsequently, current models are reviewed from the perspective of the interplay between the liquid–vapor transition and vapor transport processes. The descriptions and limitations of phase transition processes in these models are then discussed. According to these analyses, a key distinction in the description of the liquid–vapor transition lies in the presence or absence of evaporative mass flux. Kirchhoff-type formulas describe a macroscopic steady-state liquid–vapor transition in equilibrium. The use of these formulas negates external environmental influences on the transition process, including boundary layer effects. Hertz-Knudsen-type formulas capture the essence of the process, although they make overly strict assumptions about surface geometry. It is, therefore, recommended that these accommodation coefficients be verified experimentally. The enthalpy difference models, also known as Merkel models, impose additional isobaric constraints on the isothermal process, making them suitable for working conditions where pressure remains relatively constant throughout the process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 115646"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825003767","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaporative cooling technology benefits from the substantial latent heat released during the liquid–vapor phase transition process. A comprehensive understanding of the physical nature of phase transition is fundamental to this technology. This review provides an analysis of the theoretical foundations of the liquid–vapor transition, drawing on thermodynamics, kinetic theory, and relevant practical formulas. Additionally, the pertinent knowledge of hydrodynamics, particularly the description of vapor transport, is summarized. Subsequently, current models are reviewed from the perspective of the interplay between the liquid–vapor transition and vapor transport processes. The descriptions and limitations of phase transition processes in these models are then discussed. According to these analyses, a key distinction in the description of the liquid–vapor transition lies in the presence or absence of evaporative mass flux. Kirchhoff-type formulas describe a macroscopic steady-state liquid–vapor transition in equilibrium. The use of these formulas negates external environmental influences on the transition process, including boundary layer effects. Hertz-Knudsen-type formulas capture the essence of the process, although they make overly strict assumptions about surface geometry. It is, therefore, recommended that these accommodation coefficients be verified experimentally. The enthalpy difference models, also known as Merkel models, impose additional isobaric constraints on the isothermal process, making them suitable for working conditions where pressure remains relatively constant throughout the process.
期刊介绍:
An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings
Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.