Using pretrained models in ensemble learning for date fruits multiclass classification

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Food Science Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1111/1750-3841.70136
Murat Eser, Metin Bilgin, Elham Tahsin Yasin, Murat Koklu
{"title":"Using pretrained models in ensemble learning for date fruits multiclass classification","authors":"Murat Eser,&nbsp;Metin Bilgin,&nbsp;Elham Tahsin Yasin,&nbsp;Murat Koklu","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Date fruits are a primary agricultural product that comes in a variety of textures, colors, and tastes; hence, the correct classification is crucial for quality control, automatic sorting, and commercial applications. Deep learning has surely shown critically improved image classification duties. In this research, the classification of nine different date fruit types by means of four well-known convolutional neural networks (CNNs), that is, DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, ResNet18, and VGG16 as well as an ensemble learning approach was objected. It is evaluated the proposed Dirichlet Ensemble which entails the predictions from the individual CNN models and the baseline architecture across multiple epochs. Toward the assessment, the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used. The results of the experiments revealed that the Dirichlet Ensemble is better than any single model out there with an accuracy of 98.61%, precision of 98.71%, recall of 98.61%, and an F1-score of 98.62%. DenseNet121 and MobileNetV2 were the standalone models with the highest accuracy of 96.92% and 95.83%, respectively, which is why they are very useful for a limited computing system. ResNet18 was by far the best model with a final accuracy of 92.35% and even outperformed VGG16 by 16%. VGG16's unsatisfactory performance with an accuracy of 73.24% clearly indicates its inability to handle complex classification tasks. The present work also showed the effectiveness of ensemble learning in enhancing the accuracy and robustness of classification. Future research could be investigating more advanced ensemble strategies and fine-tuning techniques to improve the generalization of modeling in food classification applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Date fruits are a primary agricultural product that comes in a variety of textures, colors, and tastes; hence, the correct classification is crucial for quality control, automatic sorting, and commercial applications. Deep learning has surely shown critically improved image classification duties. In this research, the classification of nine different date fruit types by means of four well-known convolutional neural networks (CNNs), that is, DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, ResNet18, and VGG16 as well as an ensemble learning approach was objected. It is evaluated the proposed Dirichlet Ensemble which entails the predictions from the individual CNN models and the baseline architecture across multiple epochs. Toward the assessment, the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used. The results of the experiments revealed that the Dirichlet Ensemble is better than any single model out there with an accuracy of 98.61%, precision of 98.71%, recall of 98.61%, and an F1-score of 98.62%. DenseNet121 and MobileNetV2 were the standalone models with the highest accuracy of 96.92% and 95.83%, respectively, which is why they are very useful for a limited computing system. ResNet18 was by far the best model with a final accuracy of 92.35% and even outperformed VGG16 by 16%. VGG16's unsatisfactory performance with an accuracy of 73.24% clearly indicates its inability to handle complex classification tasks. The present work also showed the effectiveness of ensemble learning in enhancing the accuracy and robustness of classification. Future research could be investigating more advanced ensemble strategies and fine-tuning techniques to improve the generalization of modeling in food classification applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于预训练模型的集成学习枣多类分类
枣子是一种主要的农产品,有各种各样的质地、颜色和味道;因此,正确的分类对于质量控制、自动分拣和商业应用至关重要。深度学习在图像分类方面确实表现出了极大的改进。在本研究中,利用四种著名的卷积神经网络(cnn),即DenseNet121、MobileNetV2、ResNet18和VGG16以及集成学习方法对9种不同的枣子类型进行分类。本文对Dirichlet集成进行了评估,该集成包含来自各个CNN模型的预测和跨多个时代的基线架构。评估采用正确率、精密度、召回率和f1评分。实验结果表明,Dirichlet Ensemble的准确率为98.61%,精密度为98.71%,召回率为98.61%,f1分数为98.62%,优于现有的任何单一模型。DenseNet121和MobileNetV2分别是准确率最高的独立模型,分别为96.92%和95.83%,这就是为什么它们在有限的计算系统中非常有用。ResNet18是目前为止最好的模型,最终准确率为92.35%,甚至比VGG16高出16%。VGG16准确率仅为73.24%,表现不理想,明显表明其无法处理复杂的分类任务。本研究还表明了集成学习在提高分类精度和鲁棒性方面的有效性。未来的研究可以研究更先进的集成策略和微调技术,以提高模型在食品分类应用中的泛化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
期刊最新文献
Industrial Applications of Selected JFS Articles Gas-Producing Bacteria Causing Package Swelling in Hubei Broad Bean Paste: Isolation, Identification, and Control Micronized Dispersible Ferric Pyrophosphate (MDFP) in Extruded Rice Desserts: High Iron Bioavailability and Good Sensory Acceptance by Children Critical Influence of Size-Reduction Techniques on Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Oil and Its Analogy in Ginger Tea Flavors Effect of Lacticaseibacillus Rhamnosu AFY02 on AOM/DSS-Induced Inflammation-Associated Colon Cancer in Mice and the Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1