{"title":"EMG biofeedback and relaxation in the treatment of hyperfunctional dysphonia.","authors":"S Andrews, J Warner, R Stewart","doi":"10.3109/13682828609019847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two methods of relaxing laryngeal musculature were investigated in adults with hyperfunctional dysphonia. Assessments were conducted pre-treatment, post-treatment and at three month follow-up. Measures included the level of superficial laryngeal tension using an electromyogram, control of vocal fold vibration using Fx traces from an electrolaryngograph and an auditory evaluation using a phonation profile. Two personality questionnaires were administered and the subjects'self-rating of voice was recorded. the duration of treatment was noted. Subjects were matched into groups receiving either laryngeal EMG biofeedback or progressive relaxation, both within a graded voice training programme. A significant improvement in all measures occurred for both programmes, which was maintained at follow-up. No significant difference between the two approaches emerged. Implications for the assessment and treatment of hyperfunctional dysphonia are discussed.","PeriodicalId":76610,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of disorders of communication","volume":"21 3","pages":"353-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/13682828609019847","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of disorders of communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13682828609019847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49
Abstract
Two methods of relaxing laryngeal musculature were investigated in adults with hyperfunctional dysphonia. Assessments were conducted pre-treatment, post-treatment and at three month follow-up. Measures included the level of superficial laryngeal tension using an electromyogram, control of vocal fold vibration using Fx traces from an electrolaryngograph and an auditory evaluation using a phonation profile. Two personality questionnaires were administered and the subjects'self-rating of voice was recorded. the duration of treatment was noted. Subjects were matched into groups receiving either laryngeal EMG biofeedback or progressive relaxation, both within a graded voice training programme. A significant improvement in all measures occurred for both programmes, which was maintained at follow-up. No significant difference between the two approaches emerged. Implications for the assessment and treatment of hyperfunctional dysphonia are discussed.