Pimozide versus Haloperidol in acute schizophrenia. A double blind controlled study.

S Haas, H Beckmann
{"title":"Pimozide versus Haloperidol in acute schizophrenia. A double blind controlled study.","authors":"S Haas,&nbsp;H Beckmann","doi":"10.1055/s-2007-1019512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty acutely hospitalized schizophrenic patients were treated under double blind condition with either haloperidol (40-60 mg/day) or pimozide (40-60 mg/day) for 30 days. Ten patients in the pimozide and eleven in the haloperidol group showed a very good or good clinical response. There were no definite differences of treatment results as assessed by the Global Clinical Impression. Both groups showed a statistically significant decrease of the global scores of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (p less than 0.01). There was a significant decrease of affective bluntedness and anergia in the pimozide but not in the haloperidol group. Extrapyramidal side effects were more pronounced in patients on pimozide who therefore needed more anticholinergic drugs. There was no consistent correlation between drug serum levels and global scores or single factors of the BPRS in either treatment group. It is concluded that pimozide in dose ranges from 40-60 mg has powerful antipsychotic properties indistinguishable from those of haloperidol but exerts stronger extrapyramidal side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19840,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatria","volume":"15 2","pages":"70-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2007-1019512","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacopsychiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1019512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Thirty acutely hospitalized schizophrenic patients were treated under double blind condition with either haloperidol (40-60 mg/day) or pimozide (40-60 mg/day) for 30 days. Ten patients in the pimozide and eleven in the haloperidol group showed a very good or good clinical response. There were no definite differences of treatment results as assessed by the Global Clinical Impression. Both groups showed a statistically significant decrease of the global scores of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (p less than 0.01). There was a significant decrease of affective bluntedness and anergia in the pimozide but not in the haloperidol group. Extrapyramidal side effects were more pronounced in patients on pimozide who therefore needed more anticholinergic drugs. There was no consistent correlation between drug serum levels and global scores or single factors of the BPRS in either treatment group. It is concluded that pimozide in dose ranges from 40-60 mg has powerful antipsychotic properties indistinguishable from those of haloperidol but exerts stronger extrapyramidal side effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匹莫齐特与氟哌啶醇治疗急性精神分裂症。一项双盲对照研究。
30例急性住院精神分裂症患者在双盲条件下使用氟哌啶醇(40- 60mg /天)或匹莫齐特(40- 60mg /天)治疗30天。匹莫齐组10例患者和氟哌啶醇组11例患者表现出非常好或良好的临床反应。根据全球临床印象评估,治疗结果没有明确的差异。两组患者精神简要评定量表总体得分均有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。匹莫齐组情感钝感和神经痛明显减少,氟哌啶醇组无明显减少。吡莫胺患者的锥体外系副作用更明显,因此需要更多的抗胆碱能药物。两组患者血清药物水平与BPRS整体评分或单因素评分均无一致相关性。结论:吡莫胺在40 ~ 60mg剂量范围内具有与氟哌啶醇无异的强大抗精神病特性,但具有更强的锥体外系副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multimethodological approach in psychiatric predictor research. Psychobiological predictors of antidepressant drug response. The prediction of acute response, remission and general outcome of neuroleptic treatment in acute schizophrenic patients. Prediction of "natural" course, relapse and prophylactic response in schizophrenic patients. Prediction of course and therapeutic response in psychiatric diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1