[Are psychophysiologic changes in the "public speaking" paradigm an expression of emotional stress?].

G Erdmann, S Baumann
{"title":"[Are psychophysiologic changes in the \"public speaking\" paradigm an expression of emotional stress?].","authors":"G Erdmann,&nbsp;S Baumann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public Speaking is often used to induce anxiety. The emotional stress elicited by the anticipation of delivering a public speech, however, is usually confounded with the mental stress of speech preparation. In order to separate the effects of the emotional from those of the mental stress factor, only half of the subjects were informed about the topic of the speech at the beginning of the anticipation period, whereas the other half were told about the topic at a later time. In a pilot study, the effects of this variation were tested under a condition in which the subjects were told that the speech would be videotaped as an anxiety-provoking and under an emotionally neutral control condition. The main experiment involved an additional condition with a simulated audience designed to intensify the impact of the emotional stress component (\"strong anxiety\"). Self-reports on present state and cardio-vascular and electrodermal responses were measured in n = 12 subjects in both studies. Knowledge of the speech topic did not affect the subjective anxiety-inducing effects of public speaking. Physiologically arousing effects, however, could be shown without knowledge of the topic only in some variables and only under the \"strong anxiety\"-provoking condition. In studying public speaking anxiety, confounding with the mental stress of speech preparation should therefore be avoided and a more differentiated interpretation of the physiological effects should be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":79386,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","volume":"43 2","pages":"224-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public Speaking is often used to induce anxiety. The emotional stress elicited by the anticipation of delivering a public speech, however, is usually confounded with the mental stress of speech preparation. In order to separate the effects of the emotional from those of the mental stress factor, only half of the subjects were informed about the topic of the speech at the beginning of the anticipation period, whereas the other half were told about the topic at a later time. In a pilot study, the effects of this variation were tested under a condition in which the subjects were told that the speech would be videotaped as an anxiety-provoking and under an emotionally neutral control condition. The main experiment involved an additional condition with a simulated audience designed to intensify the impact of the emotional stress component ("strong anxiety"). Self-reports on present state and cardio-vascular and electrodermal responses were measured in n = 12 subjects in both studies. Knowledge of the speech topic did not affect the subjective anxiety-inducing effects of public speaking. Physiologically arousing effects, however, could be shown without knowledge of the topic only in some variables and only under the "strong anxiety"-provoking condition. In studying public speaking anxiety, confounding with the mental stress of speech preparation should therefore be avoided and a more differentiated interpretation of the physiological effects should be made.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[在“公开演讲”范式中的心理生理变化是情绪压力的一种表现吗?]
公众演讲常被用来引起焦虑。然而,由于期待发表公开演讲而引起的情绪压力通常与演讲准备的精神压力混淆在一起。为了区分情绪压力和精神压力因素的影响,只有一半的受试者在预期期开始时被告知演讲的主题,而另一半受试者在晚些时候被告知演讲的主题。在一项初步研究中,这种变化的影响在以下条件下进行了测试:受试者被告知演讲将被录下来,作为一种引发焦虑的演讲,而在情绪中立的控制条件下。主要实验涉及一个额外的条件,模拟观众,旨在加强情绪压力成分(“强烈焦虑”)的影响。在两项研究中,对n = 12名受试者的现状、心血管和皮肤电反应的自我报告进行了测量。对演讲主题的了解不影响公众演讲的主观焦虑诱导效果。然而,在不了解主题的情况下,只有在某些变量中,只有在“强烈焦虑”引发条件下,才能显示出生理唤起效应。因此,在研究演讲焦虑时,应避免将其与演讲准备的心理压力相混淆,并对其生理效应做出更有区别的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phonologische Bewusstheit und ihre Frderung bei Kindern mit Strungen der Sprachentwicklung Primre und Sekundre Kontrolle versus Hartnckige Zielverfolgung und Flexible Zielanpassung Entwicklung der Emotionsregulation bei 2- und 3jhrigen Mdchen Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zum Einfluss persönlicher Prioritätensetzungen auf Maße der Stimuluspräferenz: Erste empirische Befunde
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1