The utility of the Right Hemisphere Language Battery in patients with brain tumours.

A M Thomson, R Taylor, D Fraser, I R Whittle
{"title":"The utility of the Right Hemisphere Language Battery in patients with brain tumours.","authors":"A M Thomson,&nbsp;R Taylor,&nbsp;D Fraser,&nbsp;I R Whittle","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Right Hemisphere Language Battery (RHLB) (Bryan, 1989) was devised to assess the presence of language disorders in patients with damage to the right cerebral hemisphere and to permit an evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic techniques. To evaluate the utility and sensitivity of the RHLB in patients with solitary right hemispheric brain tumours 20 patients were assessed before and after neurosurgery. Twenty control subjects with no signs or symptoms of brain disease who were undergoing lumbar spinal surgery were also assessed. On six of the seven RHLB subtests there was no significant difference between the scores obtained preoperatively by patients with right hemispheric brain tumours and the control subjects. There was also no significant change in the scores of the patients with tumours before and after resection of the lesion. The RHLB is therefore not recommended for either evaluating communication deficits or for measuring the efficacy of therapeutic techniques in patients with right hemisphere brain tumours. This study does, however, show that there are statistically significant differences between the control and brain tumour groups on the discourse analysis subtest preoperatively. The implications of the study are discussed together with possible reasons for the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":77120,"journal":{"name":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","volume":"32 3 Spec No","pages":"325-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Right Hemisphere Language Battery (RHLB) (Bryan, 1989) was devised to assess the presence of language disorders in patients with damage to the right cerebral hemisphere and to permit an evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic techniques. To evaluate the utility and sensitivity of the RHLB in patients with solitary right hemispheric brain tumours 20 patients were assessed before and after neurosurgery. Twenty control subjects with no signs or symptoms of brain disease who were undergoing lumbar spinal surgery were also assessed. On six of the seven RHLB subtests there was no significant difference between the scores obtained preoperatively by patients with right hemispheric brain tumours and the control subjects. There was also no significant change in the scores of the patients with tumours before and after resection of the lesion. The RHLB is therefore not recommended for either evaluating communication deficits or for measuring the efficacy of therapeutic techniques in patients with right hemisphere brain tumours. This study does, however, show that there are statistically significant differences between the control and brain tumour groups on the discourse analysis subtest preoperatively. The implications of the study are discussed together with possible reasons for the findings.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右半球语言电池在脑肿瘤患者中的应用。
右脑语言电池(RHLB) (Bryan, 1989)被设计用来评估患有右脑损伤的患者是否存在语言障碍,并允许对治疗技术的效果进行评估。为了评估RHLB在孤立性右半脑肿瘤患者中的效用和敏感性,我们对20例患者在神经外科手术前后进行了评估。20名没有脑部疾病体征或症状的对照组正在接受腰椎手术。在7个RHLB亚测试中的6个中,右半脑肿瘤患者与对照组术前获得的分数没有显著差异。肿瘤患者在切除病变前后的评分也无显著变化。因此,RHLB不推荐用于评估右半球脑肿瘤患者的沟通缺陷或测量治疗技术的疗效。然而,这项研究确实表明,对照组和脑肿瘤组在术前话语分析子测试上存在统计学上的显著差异。本研究的意义与可能的原因一起进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcome measures for aphasia therapy: it's not what you do, it's the way that you measure it. Visual speech aids: a British survey of use and evaluation by speech and language therapists. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. Early intervention in a case of jargon aphasia: efficacy of language comprehension therapy. In-service training for schools on augmentative and alternative communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1