Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners.

F. McCall, I. Marková, J. Murphy, Eleanor Moodie, Sarah Collins
{"title":"Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners.","authors":"F. McCall, I. Marková, J. Murphy, Eleanor Moodie, Sarah Collins","doi":"10.1080/13682829709177099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examined the perspectives of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) users and their 'formal' and 'informal' communication partners in relation to two areas of relevance to AAC: firstly, communication strategies, and secondly, advantages and disadvantages of AAC systems. With respect to communication strategies, it was found that formal communication partners thought that more vocabulary for communicating social purposes was actually available to AAC users and they were less aware of daily routines within day and residential environments. With respect to advantages and disadvantages, three main areas of concern emerged: the effect of the AAC system on the users' communication; features of AAC systems; and the effect of AAC on the users' quality of life. Both high- and low-technology AAC systems were seen as having advantages and disadvantages. This study demonstrates the important contribution to be made by AAC users in the provision of a new set of priorities based on their user experiences.","PeriodicalId":77120,"journal":{"name":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","volume":"32 3 Spec No 1","pages":"235-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13682829709177099","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13682829709177099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

The study examined the perspectives of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) users and their 'formal' and 'informal' communication partners in relation to two areas of relevance to AAC: firstly, communication strategies, and secondly, advantages and disadvantages of AAC systems. With respect to communication strategies, it was found that formal communication partners thought that more vocabulary for communicating social purposes was actually available to AAC users and they were less aware of daily routines within day and residential environments. With respect to advantages and disadvantages, three main areas of concern emerged: the effect of the AAC system on the users' communication; features of AAC systems; and the effect of AAC on the users' quality of life. Both high- and low-technology AAC systems were seen as having advantages and disadvantages. This study demonstrates the important contribution to be made by AAC users in the provision of a new set of priorities based on their user experiences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用户及其通信伙伴对AAC系统的看法。
本研究考察了辅助和替代通信(AAC)用户及其“正式”和“非正式”通信伙伴在与辅助和替代通信相关的两个领域的观点:第一,通信策略,第二,辅助和替代通信系统的优缺点。在交际策略方面,研究发现,正式交际伙伴认为AAC用户实际上可以使用更多用于交际社交目的的词汇,而他们对日常生活和居住环境的日常生活了解较少。关于优点和缺点,出现了三个主要的关切领域:AAC制度对用户交流的影响;AAC系统的特点;以及AAC对用户生活质量的影响。高技术和低技术的AAC系统都被认为有优点和缺点。这项研究证明了AAC用户在根据他们的用户体验提供一套新的优先级方面做出的重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcome measures for aphasia therapy: it's not what you do, it's the way that you measure it. Visual speech aids: a British survey of use and evaluation by speech and language therapists. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. Early intervention in a case of jargon aphasia: efficacy of language comprehension therapy. In-service training for schools on augmentative and alternative communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1