Outcome measures for aphasia therapy: it's not what you do, it's the way that you measure it.

A. Hesketh, B. Hopcutt
{"title":"Outcome measures for aphasia therapy: it's not what you do, it's the way that you measure it.","authors":"A. Hesketh, B. Hopcutt","doi":"10.1080/13682829709177096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of outcome measures is now seen as crucial within the National Health Service (NHS), and the outcome of aphasia therapy is an area which has for some years been under particular scrutiny. Many districts have developed their own measures and others have taken part in cross-district pilot schemes, but it is not clear how widely used measures are, nor what form they take. This paper presents the results of a questionnaire survey of speech and language therapy services in England and Wales regarding their use of outcome measures for aphasia therapy. The questionnaire requested factual information about the use of measures, and therapists' opinions of their benefits and drawbacks, and also asked for examples of outcome measures currently in use. We summarise the results of the questionnaire and discuss the therapists' and our own perceptions of the merits of the different approaches reported.","PeriodicalId":77120,"journal":{"name":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","volume":"32 3 Spec No 1","pages":"189-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13682829709177096","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13682829709177096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The development of outcome measures is now seen as crucial within the National Health Service (NHS), and the outcome of aphasia therapy is an area which has for some years been under particular scrutiny. Many districts have developed their own measures and others have taken part in cross-district pilot schemes, but it is not clear how widely used measures are, nor what form they take. This paper presents the results of a questionnaire survey of speech and language therapy services in England and Wales regarding their use of outcome measures for aphasia therapy. The questionnaire requested factual information about the use of measures, and therapists' opinions of their benefits and drawbacks, and also asked for examples of outcome measures currently in use. We summarise the results of the questionnaire and discuss the therapists' and our own perceptions of the merits of the different approaches reported.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失语症治疗的结果衡量标准不是你做了什么,而是你衡量它的方式。
结果衡量标准的发展现在被视为国民保健服务(NHS)的关键,失语治疗的结果是一个多年来一直受到特别审查的领域。许多地区已经制定了自己的措施,其他地区也参与了跨地区试点计划,但目前尚不清楚这些措施的使用范围有多广,也不清楚它们采取的是什么形式。本文提出了一项问卷调查的结果,语言和语言治疗服务在英格兰和威尔士关于他们使用失语治疗的结果措施。问卷要求提供有关测量方法使用的事实信息,以及治疗师对其优缺点的意见,并要求提供目前使用的结果测量方法的示例。我们总结了问卷调查的结果,并讨论了治疗师和我们自己对所报告的不同方法的优点的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcome measures for aphasia therapy: it's not what you do, it's the way that you measure it. Visual speech aids: a British survey of use and evaluation by speech and language therapists. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. Early intervention in a case of jargon aphasia: efficacy of language comprehension therapy. In-service training for schools on augmentative and alternative communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1