Variability in upper motor neurone-type dysarthria: an examination of five cases with dysarthria following cerebrovascular accident.

E C Thompson, B E Murdoch, D G Theodoros
{"title":"Variability in upper motor neurone-type dysarthria: an examination of five cases with dysarthria following cerebrovascular accident.","authors":"E C Thompson,&nbsp;B E Murdoch,&nbsp;D G Theodoros","doi":"10.3109/13682829709082256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The degree of diversity in the nature and extent of the physiological deficits which occur in subjects with dysarthria with similar neurological damage is demonstrated through the individual assessment profiles of five subjects with dysarthria following upper motor neurone (UMN) damage. The perceptual profiles of each subject were compiled using perceptual ratings of deviant speech parameters, intelligibility ratings from the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech (ASSIDS), and perceptual judgements of subsystem function determined from the Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment (FDA). For each individual, the perceptual profile of their speech impairments was compared and contrasted with the objective results of spirometric and kinematic assessments of respiratory function aerodynamic and electroglottographic evaluations of laryngeal function, pressure and strain gauge evaluations of articulatory function, and nasal accelerometric assessments of nasality. The outcomes of the individual perceptual and physiological profiles are discussed with respect to the presence of differential subsystem impairments both within each subject and between subjects with similar underlying pathophysiological deficits. The importance of interpreting the instrumental findings with respect to the interdependency of each of the motor speech subsystems, the limitations of perceptual assessments, and the advantages of utilising both perceptual and physiological analyses in the process of identifying treatment goals is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77120,"journal":{"name":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","volume":"32 4","pages":"397-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/13682829709082256","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829709082256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The degree of diversity in the nature and extent of the physiological deficits which occur in subjects with dysarthria with similar neurological damage is demonstrated through the individual assessment profiles of five subjects with dysarthria following upper motor neurone (UMN) damage. The perceptual profiles of each subject were compiled using perceptual ratings of deviant speech parameters, intelligibility ratings from the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech (ASSIDS), and perceptual judgements of subsystem function determined from the Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment (FDA). For each individual, the perceptual profile of their speech impairments was compared and contrasted with the objective results of spirometric and kinematic assessments of respiratory function aerodynamic and electroglottographic evaluations of laryngeal function, pressure and strain gauge evaluations of articulatory function, and nasal accelerometric assessments of nasality. The outcomes of the individual perceptual and physiological profiles are discussed with respect to the presence of differential subsystem impairments both within each subject and between subjects with similar underlying pathophysiological deficits. The importance of interpreting the instrumental findings with respect to the interdependency of each of the motor speech subsystems, the limitations of perceptual assessments, and the advantages of utilising both perceptual and physiological analyses in the process of identifying treatment goals is discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上运动神经元型构音障碍的变异性:脑血管意外后构音障碍5例分析。
通过对5名上运动神经元(UMN)损伤后构音障碍患者的个体评估,可以证明具有类似神经损伤的构音障碍患者生理缺陷的性质和程度的多样性。使用异常语音参数的感知评分、构音障碍语音可理解性评估(ASSIDS)的可理解性评分和法国构音障碍评估(FDA)对子系统功能的感知判断来编制每个受试者的感知特征。对于每个个体,他们的语言障碍的感知特征与呼吸功能的肺活量和运动学评估、喉功能的空气动力学和声门电图评估、发音功能的压力和应变测量评估以及鼻功能的鼻加速度评估的客观结果进行了比较和对比。本文讨论了个体知觉和生理特征的结果,即每个受试者内部和具有相似潜在病理生理缺陷的受试者之间存在差异的子系统损伤。讨论了在确定治疗目标的过程中利用感知和生理分析来解释每个运动语音子系统相互依赖性的工具发现的重要性,感知评估的局限性以及优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcome measures for aphasia therapy: it's not what you do, it's the way that you measure it. Visual speech aids: a British survey of use and evaluation by speech and language therapists. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. Early intervention in a case of jargon aphasia: efficacy of language comprehension therapy. In-service training for schools on augmentative and alternative communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1