Marianne Tvermyr , Bjørn E Kristiansen, Tom Kristensen
{"title":"Cloning, sequence analysis and expression in E. coli of the DNA polymerase I gene from Chloroflexus aurantiacus, a green","authors":"Marianne Tvermyr , Bjørn E Kristiansen, Tom Kristensen","doi":"10.1016/S1050-3862(97)10002-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We have cloned and sequenced the <em>pol</em>A gene from <em>Chloroflexus aurantiacus</em>, a green nonsulfur eubacterium, and expressed the recombinant protein in <em>Escherichia coli</em>. One open reading frame encodes a protein with 942 amino acids showing 38% identity with DNA polymerase I from <em>E. coli</em>. Sequence alignments with other members of DNA polymerase family A and analysis of the separate domains show that the central 3′-5′ exonuclease domain is 30% identical to the corresponding <em>E. coli</em> domain and that three sequence motifs associated with 3′-5′ exonuclease activity are conserved. Also, a protein fraction from <em>E. coli</em> expressing the <em>Chloroflexus</em> polymerase contains a thermostable 3′-5′ exonucleolytic activity, indicating that this activity is present in the enzyme, in agreement with the sequence analysis. The N-terminal 5′-3′ exonuclease domain and the C-terminal polymerase domain show 31 and 46% identity, respectively, with the corresponding <em>E. coli</em> domains and all sequence motifs associated with these two enzymatic activities also are conserved. Since several DNA polymerase I enzymes lack the proofreading activity associated with the central domain it has been suggested that the ancestral <em>pol</em>A gene contained only the two more conserved N- and C-terminal domains and that the proofreading 3′-5′ exonuclease domain was introduced later in those eubacterial branches that have this activity. Our data indicate a different scenario where the ancestral <em>pol</em>A gene contained both the exonucleolytic activities in addition to the polymerase activity and where several eubacterial branches lost the polymerase-associated proofreading activity during evolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77142,"journal":{"name":"Genetic analysis, techniques and applications","volume":"14 3","pages":"Pages 75-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1050-3862(97)10002-X","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic analysis, techniques and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105038629710002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
We have cloned and sequenced the polA gene from Chloroflexus aurantiacus, a green nonsulfur eubacterium, and expressed the recombinant protein in Escherichia coli. One open reading frame encodes a protein with 942 amino acids showing 38% identity with DNA polymerase I from E. coli. Sequence alignments with other members of DNA polymerase family A and analysis of the separate domains show that the central 3′-5′ exonuclease domain is 30% identical to the corresponding E. coli domain and that three sequence motifs associated with 3′-5′ exonuclease activity are conserved. Also, a protein fraction from E. coli expressing the Chloroflexus polymerase contains a thermostable 3′-5′ exonucleolytic activity, indicating that this activity is present in the enzyme, in agreement with the sequence analysis. The N-terminal 5′-3′ exonuclease domain and the C-terminal polymerase domain show 31 and 46% identity, respectively, with the corresponding E. coli domains and all sequence motifs associated with these two enzymatic activities also are conserved. Since several DNA polymerase I enzymes lack the proofreading activity associated with the central domain it has been suggested that the ancestral polA gene contained only the two more conserved N- and C-terminal domains and that the proofreading 3′-5′ exonuclease domain was introduced later in those eubacterial branches that have this activity. Our data indicate a different scenario where the ancestral polA gene contained both the exonucleolytic activities in addition to the polymerase activity and where several eubacterial branches lost the polymerase-associated proofreading activity during evolution.