Event-related desynchronization and synchronization during an auditory lexical matching task

Mira Karrasch , Christina M. Krause , Matti Laine , A.Heikki Lang , Marko Lehto
{"title":"Event-related desynchronization and synchronization during an auditory lexical matching task","authors":"Mira Karrasch ,&nbsp;Christina M. Krause ,&nbsp;Matti Laine ,&nbsp;A.Heikki Lang ,&nbsp;Marko Lehto","doi":"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00047-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong>: Event-related desynchronization (ERD) and synchronization (ERS) of the 8–10 and 10–12 Hz frequency bands of the background EEG were studied in 10 subjects performing an auditory lexical matching task.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: The stimuli were words and pseudowords presented sequentially in pairs. The subject was prompted to answer whether the two stimuli shared the same lexical status (words or pseudowords).</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Regardless of lexicality, the presentation of the first stimulus elicited a significant late frontal ERD in both alpha frequency bands. When preceded by a pseudoword, the presentation of the second stimulus elicited a significant ERS at 200–400 ms and a significant, long-lasting and topographically-widespread ERD at 600–2200 ms in both frequency bands. When preceded by a word, the second stimulus did not elicit ERS in the initial time window, but a late ERD which was similar to the one observed in the previous condition. The complexity of ERD/ERS changes in the present task was revealed by significant interactions that time had with frequency band, stimulus type, stimulus order and lexicality of the preceding stimulus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: The results suggest that ERD/ERS does not reflect primary auditory stimulus processing. Rather, the ERD/ERS observed in this experiment most probably reflected task difficulty and differences between lexical–semantic and phonological memory functions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"107 2","pages":"Pages 112-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00047-9","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Objectives: Event-related desynchronization (ERD) and synchronization (ERS) of the 8–10 and 10–12 Hz frequency bands of the background EEG were studied in 10 subjects performing an auditory lexical matching task.

Methods: The stimuli were words and pseudowords presented sequentially in pairs. The subject was prompted to answer whether the two stimuli shared the same lexical status (words or pseudowords).

Results: Regardless of lexicality, the presentation of the first stimulus elicited a significant late frontal ERD in both alpha frequency bands. When preceded by a pseudoword, the presentation of the second stimulus elicited a significant ERS at 200–400 ms and a significant, long-lasting and topographically-widespread ERD at 600–2200 ms in both frequency bands. When preceded by a word, the second stimulus did not elicit ERS in the initial time window, but a late ERD which was similar to the one observed in the previous condition. The complexity of ERD/ERS changes in the present task was revealed by significant interactions that time had with frequency band, stimulus type, stimulus order and lexicality of the preceding stimulus.

Conclusions: The results suggest that ERD/ERS does not reflect primary auditory stimulus processing. Rather, the ERD/ERS observed in this experiment most probably reflected task difficulty and differences between lexical–semantic and phonological memory functions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听觉词汇匹配任务中与事件相关的去同步和同步
目的:研究10名被试进行听觉词汇匹配任务时背景脑电图8-10和10 - 12 Hz频段的事件相关去同步(ERD)和同步(ERS)。方法:以单词和假词为刺激物,按顺序成对呈现。受试者被要求回答这两个刺激物是否具有相同的词汇状态(单词或假词)。结果:无论词汇是否丰富,第一刺激的呈现在两个α频带都引起了显著的晚额叶ERD。当出现假词时,第二刺激在200-400 ms时引起了显著的ERS,在600-2200 ms时引起了显著的、持久的、地形上广泛的ERD。当第二刺激物前面有一个单词时,在初始时间窗内不会诱发ERS,但会诱发与前一刺激物相似的后期ERD。当前任务ERD/ERS变化的复杂性体现在时间与前一个刺激的频带、刺激类型、刺激顺序和词性的显著交互作用上。结论:ERD/ERS不反映初级听觉刺激加工。相反,本实验中观察到的ERD/ERS很可能反映了任务难度以及词汇-语义和语音记忆功能之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiparameter flow cytometry and ClonoSEQ correlation to evaluate precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia measurable residual disease. Deterioration from healthy to mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease mirrored in corresponding loss of centrality in directed brain networks. The utility of radionucleotide imaging in the surgical management of axial neck pain from cervical facet joint arthropathy. Medical oncology future plan of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology: challenges and future needs of the Spanish oncologists. A central role for calcineurin in protein misfolding neurodegenerative diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1