Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of multi-purpose lens care solutions using the FDA's revised guidance document for industry: stand-alone primary criteria.

A M Lever, M J Miller
{"title":"Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of multi-purpose lens care solutions using the FDA's revised guidance document for industry: stand-alone primary criteria.","authors":"A M Lever,&nbsp;M J Miller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated six single-bottle, multi-purpose lens care solutions and a two component lens care system for disinfection efficacy according to the stand-alone primary criteria within the recently published U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-tenth mL of 1 x 10(8) colony forming units (CFU)/mL of bacterial and fungal challenge organisms was added to each test solution. Following a specified period (e.g., each manufacturer's labeled minimum disinfection time), aliquots of inoculated test solution were neutralized and plated on validated recovery media. After incubation the number of viable microorganisms were enumerated and mean log reductions determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ReNu and ReNu MultiPlus met the FDA's acceptance criteria for stand-alone disinfectants against all challenge organisms: Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and Fusarium solani. Opti-Free Express failed to meet the FDA's stand-alone disinfectant acceptance criteria for S. aureus, S. marcescens and C. albicans and Opti-Free Express with Opti-Free Supraclens failed to meet the acceptance criteria for either S. aureus and C. albicans. Opti-One failed to meet the FDA's stand-alone disinfectant acceptance criteria for C. albicans and F. solani. Both Complete and Solo-Care failed to meet the FDA's acceptance criteria for C. albicans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This evaluation provides a direct comparison of antimicrobial activity (based on stand-alone criteria) for commercially available multi-purpose lens care solutions at their labeled minimum disinfection times. The results of this study should be considered when selecting appropriate lens care systems for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"25 1","pages":"52-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated six single-bottle, multi-purpose lens care solutions and a two component lens care system for disinfection efficacy according to the stand-alone primary criteria within the recently published U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidelines.

Methods: One-tenth mL of 1 x 10(8) colony forming units (CFU)/mL of bacterial and fungal challenge organisms was added to each test solution. Following a specified period (e.g., each manufacturer's labeled minimum disinfection time), aliquots of inoculated test solution were neutralized and plated on validated recovery media. After incubation the number of viable microorganisms were enumerated and mean log reductions determined.

Results: ReNu and ReNu MultiPlus met the FDA's acceptance criteria for stand-alone disinfectants against all challenge organisms: Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and Fusarium solani. Opti-Free Express failed to meet the FDA's stand-alone disinfectant acceptance criteria for S. aureus, S. marcescens and C. albicans and Opti-Free Express with Opti-Free Supraclens failed to meet the acceptance criteria for either S. aureus and C. albicans. Opti-One failed to meet the FDA's stand-alone disinfectant acceptance criteria for C. albicans and F. solani. Both Complete and Solo-Care failed to meet the FDA's acceptance criteria for C. albicans.

Conclusions: This evaluation provides a direct comparison of antimicrobial activity (based on stand-alone criteria) for commercially available multi-purpose lens care solutions at their labeled minimum disinfection times. The results of this study should be considered when selecting appropriate lens care systems for patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用FDA修订的行业指导文件的多用途镜片护理溶液的比较抗菌功效:独立的主要标准。
目的:我们根据最近发布的美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)指南中的独立主要标准评估了六种单瓶多用途镜片护理液和一种双组分镜片护理系统的消毒效果。方法:在每个测试溶液中加入1 × 10(8)菌落形成单位(CFU)/mL的十分之一mL。在指定的时间(例如,每个制造商标记的最短消毒时间)之后,等量的接种试验溶液被中和并镀在经过验证的回收介质上。孵育后,计数活菌的数量,并确定平均对数减少。结果:ReNu和ReNu MultiPlus符合FDA对所有挑战生物的独立消毒剂的接受标准:金黄色葡萄球菌、粘质沙雷氏菌、铜绿假单胞菌、白色念珠菌和茄兰镰刀菌。Opti-Free Express不符合FDA对金黄色葡萄球菌、粘质葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌的独立消毒剂验收标准,而Opti-Free Supraclens不符合金黄色葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌的验收标准。Opti-One未能达到FDA对白色念珠菌和梭兰氏菌的独立消毒剂验收标准。Complete和Solo-Care均未达到FDA对白色念珠菌的接受标准。结论:本评价提供了一个直接比较的抗菌活性(基于独立的标准),市售的多用途镜片护理液在其标记的最小消毒时间。在为患者选择合适的晶状体护理系统时应考虑本研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microbiologic evaluation of frequent-replacement soft contact lenses. Objective assessment of aberrations induced by multifocal contact lenses in vivo. Initial selection of soft contact lenses based on corneal characteristics. Retrospective safety study of the herrick lacrimal plug: a device used to occlude the lacrimal canaliculus. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry-eye symptoms in contact lens wearers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1