Objective assessment of aberrations induced by multifocal contact lenses in vivo.

Sudi Patel, Mohammed Fakhry, Jorge L Alió
{"title":"Objective assessment of aberrations induced by multifocal contact lenses in vivo.","authors":"Sudi Patel,&nbsp;Mohammed Fakhry,&nbsp;Jorge L Alió","doi":"10.1097/01.ICL.0000024116.28160.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the effects of a soft multifocal progressive contact lens on individual Zernike coefficients describing the aberrations of the eye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ocular wavefront aberrations (OWA) of 10 subjects not wearing contact lenses were quantified using a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer and were repeated after lens insertion (two lenses,+2 diopters [D], and -2D distance power, order of insertion was randomized). All data were captured and stored on computer. Each coefficient of the Zernike polynomials representing, coma, spherical aberration (SA), and the fifth-order aberrations were evaluated for each OWA. Pupil size was monitored using an infrared device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After subjecting the data to various permutations, the following relationships and chief findings were detected: (1) Comparing coefficients with and without lenses, significant correlations for coma (Z(1)3 [rho,theta], P=0.0056; -2D and P=0.0399, +2D); SA (Z(0)4 [rho,theta], P=0.0006; -2D; and P=0.0061,+2D). Fifth-order aberration (Z(-1)5 [rho,theta], P= 0.0029,+2D). (2) With the -2D lens, the average root-mean-square (RMS) value for the SA coefficient Z(4)4 (rho,theta) and fifth-order Z(-3)5 (rho,theta) increased (P=0.045 and 0.0392, respectively). (3) With the +2D lens, the average RMS value for fifth-order coefficient Z(1)5(rho,theta) increased (P=0.0278). (4) Coma (Z(1)3 [rho,theta] coefficient) correlated with pupil size (P<0.05). Initial mean (+/-SD) pupil size (mm) was 3.05 (0.499), and this did not change significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Z(1)3(rho,theta) and Z(0)4(rho,theta) coefficients may be useful objective markers of success or failure for such contact lenses. The -2D lens had a more predictable effect on SA compared with the +2D lens design. The opposite occurs when considering the effects on the higher fifth-order order aberrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"28 4","pages":"196-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ICL.0000024116.28160.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the effects of a soft multifocal progressive contact lens on individual Zernike coefficients describing the aberrations of the eye.

Methods: Ocular wavefront aberrations (OWA) of 10 subjects not wearing contact lenses were quantified using a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer and were repeated after lens insertion (two lenses,+2 diopters [D], and -2D distance power, order of insertion was randomized). All data were captured and stored on computer. Each coefficient of the Zernike polynomials representing, coma, spherical aberration (SA), and the fifth-order aberrations were evaluated for each OWA. Pupil size was monitored using an infrared device.

Results: After subjecting the data to various permutations, the following relationships and chief findings were detected: (1) Comparing coefficients with and without lenses, significant correlations for coma (Z(1)3 [rho,theta], P=0.0056; -2D and P=0.0399, +2D); SA (Z(0)4 [rho,theta], P=0.0006; -2D; and P=0.0061,+2D). Fifth-order aberration (Z(-1)5 [rho,theta], P= 0.0029,+2D). (2) With the -2D lens, the average root-mean-square (RMS) value for the SA coefficient Z(4)4 (rho,theta) and fifth-order Z(-3)5 (rho,theta) increased (P=0.045 and 0.0392, respectively). (3) With the +2D lens, the average RMS value for fifth-order coefficient Z(1)5(rho,theta) increased (P=0.0278). (4) Coma (Z(1)3 [rho,theta] coefficient) correlated with pupil size (P<0.05). Initial mean (+/-SD) pupil size (mm) was 3.05 (0.499), and this did not change significantly.

Conclusions: Z(1)3(rho,theta) and Z(0)4(rho,theta) coefficients may be useful objective markers of success or failure for such contact lenses. The -2D lens had a more predictable effect on SA compared with the +2D lens design. The opposite occurs when considering the effects on the higher fifth-order order aberrations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多焦隐形眼镜体内像差的客观评价。
目的:本研究考察了软性多焦点渐进隐形眼镜对描述眼睛像差的单个泽尼克系数的影响。方法:采用Shack-Hartmann像差仪对10例未配戴隐形眼镜的受试者进行眼波前像差(OWA)测量,并在配戴隐形眼镜后(2块隐形眼镜,+2屈光度[D], -2D距离幂,配戴顺序随机)进行重复测量。所有的数据都被捕获并存储在计算机中。每个OWA的泽尼克多项式的系数分别代表彗差、球差(SA)和五阶像差。使用红外装置监测瞳孔大小。结果:对数据进行各种排列后,发现了以下关系和主要发现:(1)比较带透镜和不带透镜的系数,昏迷的相关性显著(Z(1)3 [rho,theta], P=0.0056;-2D, P=0.0399, +2D);SA (Z(0)4 [rho,theta], P=0.0006;2 d;和P = 0.0061 + 2 d)。五阶像差(Z(-1)5 [rho,theta], P= 0.0029,+2D)。(2)采用-2D透镜后,SA系数Z(4)4 (rho,theta)和五阶Z(-3)5 (rho,theta)的均方根(RMS)平均值增加(P分别为0.045和0.0392)。(3) +2D镜头时,五阶系数Z(1)5(rho,theta)的平均RMS值增加(P=0.0278)。结论:Z(1)3(rho,theta)和Z(0)4(rho,theta)系数可作为隐形眼镜配戴成功或失败的客观指标。与+2D镜头设计相比,-2D镜头对SA的影响更可预测。当考虑对高五阶阶像差的影响时,情况正好相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microbiologic evaluation of frequent-replacement soft contact lenses. Objective assessment of aberrations induced by multifocal contact lenses in vivo. Initial selection of soft contact lenses based on corneal characteristics. Retrospective safety study of the herrick lacrimal plug: a device used to occlude the lacrimal canaliculus. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry-eye symptoms in contact lens wearers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1