[Motivation for the choice of complementary and mainstream medicine. Patients' behavior in a pluralistic medical system].

Q Medicine Forschende Komplementarmedizin Pub Date : 1999-02-01 DOI:10.1159/000057121
A Schär, V Messerli-Rohrbach
{"title":"[Motivation for the choice of complementary and mainstream medicine. Patients' behavior in a pluralistic medical system].","authors":"A Schär,&nbsp;V Messerli-Rohrbach","doi":"10.1159/000057121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reasons for choosing between various therapeutic possibilities depend in part on rational and in part on emotional factors. This project dealt with the systematic verification of some decision factors most of which were known already. The project was divided in a qualitative and a quantitative part. The qualitative segment was based on semistructured interviews with patients of general practitioners or of naturopaths. This procedure is often used in ethnological research. It identified and evaluated the main motives for the individual choices of therapies by the patients. The quantitative part of the study was carried out by a procedure often used in social sciences, namely by strictly structured telephone interviews of several thousand policyholders of the health insurance fund Helvetia. The aim of this part of the study was to verify the findings of the qualitative study and to investigate the possible significance of additional sociological factors for the choice between different therapies. The conclusions drawn from the abundance of data show that a widespread use of complementary medicine is a reality. Both parts of the project came to the same conclusions. The patients use complementary medicine in a very pragmatic way, be it alternately, be it in parallel but not necessarily in addition to mainstream medicine. The behavior of the patients is very complex, depends on many factors, and can neither be predicted nor easily influenced, not even by an additional free insurance for complementary medicine which was offered to one of the subgroups of the study (in conjunction with J. Sommer's project 'A Randomized Experiment Studying the Effect of Including Complementary Medicine in the Mandatory Benefit Package of Health Insurance Funds in Switzerland'). The interpretation of the telephone interviews concerning the significance of some of the registered sociological factors turned out to be difficult. The project aimed primarily at illustrating the use of complementary medicine and at characterizing its users.</p>","PeriodicalId":54318,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":"6 Suppl 1 ","pages":"10-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000057121","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000057121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The reasons for choosing between various therapeutic possibilities depend in part on rational and in part on emotional factors. This project dealt with the systematic verification of some decision factors most of which were known already. The project was divided in a qualitative and a quantitative part. The qualitative segment was based on semistructured interviews with patients of general practitioners or of naturopaths. This procedure is often used in ethnological research. It identified and evaluated the main motives for the individual choices of therapies by the patients. The quantitative part of the study was carried out by a procedure often used in social sciences, namely by strictly structured telephone interviews of several thousand policyholders of the health insurance fund Helvetia. The aim of this part of the study was to verify the findings of the qualitative study and to investigate the possible significance of additional sociological factors for the choice between different therapies. The conclusions drawn from the abundance of data show that a widespread use of complementary medicine is a reality. Both parts of the project came to the same conclusions. The patients use complementary medicine in a very pragmatic way, be it alternately, be it in parallel but not necessarily in addition to mainstream medicine. The behavior of the patients is very complex, depends on many factors, and can neither be predicted nor easily influenced, not even by an additional free insurance for complementary medicine which was offered to one of the subgroups of the study (in conjunction with J. Sommer's project 'A Randomized Experiment Studying the Effect of Including Complementary Medicine in the Mandatory Benefit Package of Health Insurance Funds in Switzerland'). The interpretation of the telephone interviews concerning the significance of some of the registered sociological factors turned out to be difficult. The project aimed primarily at illustrating the use of complementary medicine and at characterizing its users.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[选择补充医学和主流医学的动机。多元医疗体系中的患者行为[j]。
在各种治疗可能性之间进行选择的原因部分取决于理性因素,部分取决于情感因素。这个项目处理了一些决策因素的系统验证,其中大多数是已知的。这个项目分为定性和定量两个部分。定性部分是基于对全科医生或自然疗法患者的半结构化访谈。这种方法常用于民族学研究。它确定并评估了患者个体选择治疗方法的主要动机。研究的定量部分采用社会科学中经常使用的程序进行,即对Helvetia健康保险基金的数千名投保人进行严格的结构化电话访谈。这部分研究的目的是验证定性研究的结果,并调查其他社会学因素对不同治疗方法之间选择的可能意义。从大量数据中得出的结论表明,补充医学的广泛使用是现实的。该项目的两个部分都得出了相同的结论。患者以一种非常务实的方式使用补充医学,可以交替使用,也可以并行使用,但不一定是在主流医学之外。患者的行为非常复杂,取决于许多因素,既无法预测,也不容易受到影响,即使是向研究的一个亚组提供补充医疗的额外免费保险(与J. Sommer的项目“将补充医疗纳入瑞士健康保险基金强制性福利计划的随机实验研究”相结合)。对电话采访中所记录的一些社会学因素的重要性的解释是困难的。该项目的主要目的是说明补充医疗的使用情况并说明其使用者的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unusual claims, normative process: on the use and stringency of the scientific method. Prospective controlled cohort studies on long-term therapy of cervical cancer patients with a mistletoe preparation (Iscador). Supportive evidence for the anticancerous potential of alternative medicine against hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. [Repeated cold water stimulations (hydrotherapy according to Kneipp) in patients with COPD]. [Evaluation of use of complementary and alternative medicine by schizophrenic patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1