[Evaluation of use of complementary and alternative medicine by schizophrenic patients].

Q Medicine Forschende Komplementarmedizin Pub Date : 2007-06-01 Epub Date: 2007-06-22 DOI:10.1159/000102759
Gary Bruno Schmid, Katharina Brunisholz
{"title":"[Evaluation of use of complementary and alternative medicine by schizophrenic patients].","authors":"Gary Bruno Schmid,&nbsp;Katharina Brunisholz","doi":"10.1159/000102759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Natural and alternative healing methods are becoming ever more popular in the USA and Europe. Nevertheless, objective data about the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by persons suffering from schizophrenic disturbances is scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether patients who had undergone or were undergoing stationary treatment for a schizophrenic disturbance preferred CAM and, if so, to what extent.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Via a special questionnaire, 70 patients in the adult psychiatry wards of a public hospital in Switzerland were interviewed. Most patients were undergoing stationary treatment with neuroleptics. The questionnaire covered various types of standard medical treatment as well as treatments with CAM, and explored patient motivation for their respective use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAM methods were quite popular: they were used by 82% of all women and 91% of all men for treatment of mental problems, and were further recommended by 93% of women and 80% of men. Sex, age, highest educational level, present vocational position and severity of illness had no significant influence upon popularity. Most popular CAM methods were preparations for ingestion, psychological and imaginative procedures, body-oriented psychotherapy, and treatments involving sensory perceptions. Motivation for use of CAM encompassed personal interest, friends, family and acquaintances as well as an overall wish for treatment complementary to main stream.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAM methods are used in addition to - not instead of - usual practices of established medicine, and are just as popular as standard methods. Accordingly, CAM can justifiably be regarded as belonging to the 'main stream' of the health-seeking public.</p>","PeriodicalId":54318,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":"14 3","pages":"167-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000102759","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000102759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2007/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Natural and alternative healing methods are becoming ever more popular in the USA and Europe. Nevertheless, objective data about the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by persons suffering from schizophrenic disturbances is scarce.

Objective: To examine whether patients who had undergone or were undergoing stationary treatment for a schizophrenic disturbance preferred CAM and, if so, to what extent.

Material and methods: Via a special questionnaire, 70 patients in the adult psychiatry wards of a public hospital in Switzerland were interviewed. Most patients were undergoing stationary treatment with neuroleptics. The questionnaire covered various types of standard medical treatment as well as treatments with CAM, and explored patient motivation for their respective use.

Results: CAM methods were quite popular: they were used by 82% of all women and 91% of all men for treatment of mental problems, and were further recommended by 93% of women and 80% of men. Sex, age, highest educational level, present vocational position and severity of illness had no significant influence upon popularity. Most popular CAM methods were preparations for ingestion, psychological and imaginative procedures, body-oriented psychotherapy, and treatments involving sensory perceptions. Motivation for use of CAM encompassed personal interest, friends, family and acquaintances as well as an overall wish for treatment complementary to main stream.

Conclusions: CAM methods are used in addition to - not instead of - usual practices of established medicine, and are just as popular as standard methods. Accordingly, CAM can justifiably be regarded as belonging to the 'main stream' of the health-seeking public.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[精神分裂症患者使用补充和替代药物的评估]。
背景:在美国和欧洲,自然和替代治疗方法正变得越来越流行。然而,关于精神分裂症患者使用补充和替代医学(CAM)的客观数据很少。目的:研究接受过或正在接受固定治疗的精神分裂症患者是否更喜欢CAM,如果是,在多大程度上。材料和方法:通过一份特殊的问卷调查,对瑞士一家公立医院成人精神病病房的70名患者进行了访谈。大多数患者正在接受稳定的抗精神病药物治疗。问卷调查涵盖了各类标准医疗和辅助医学治疗,并探讨了患者各自使用的动机。结果:CAM方法非常流行:82%的女性和91%的男性使用CAM方法治疗精神问题,93%的女性和80%的男性进一步推荐CAM方法。性别、年龄、最高受教育程度、目前职业职位和疾病严重程度对受欢迎程度无显著影响。最流行的辅助治疗方法是准备摄入,心理和想象程序,以身体为导向的心理治疗和涉及感官知觉的治疗。使用辅助治疗的动机包括个人兴趣、朋友、家人和熟人,以及对主流治疗补充的总体愿望。结论:辅助医学方法是对现有医学常规做法的补充,而不是替代,并且与标准方法一样受欢迎。因此,CAM有理由被视为属于寻求健康的公众的"主流"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unusual claims, normative process: on the use and stringency of the scientific method. Prospective controlled cohort studies on long-term therapy of cervical cancer patients with a mistletoe preparation (Iscador). Supportive evidence for the anticancerous potential of alternative medicine against hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. [Repeated cold water stimulations (hydrotherapy according to Kneipp) in patients with COPD]. [Evaluation of use of complementary and alternative medicine by schizophrenic patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1