Multi-attribute analysis of benefit managers' preferences for smoking cessation programs.

Health values Pub Date : 1990-09-01
R Spoth
{"title":"Multi-attribute analysis of benefit managers' preferences for smoking cessation programs.","authors":"R Spoth","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reports the results of formative research on worksite benefit managers' preferences for smoking cessation programs. Procedures focused on application of a multi-attribute preference evaluation method known as conjoint analysis. Literature reviews, small-sample telephone interviews, and a focus group were used to guide selection of cessation program attributes for this analysis. Personnel benefit managers representing a variety of worksites (N = 103) across the U.S. were then randomly selected for participation in the study. Results suggested that cost per employee, program management options, success rates, and endorsements were associated with relatively higher utility values, as compared with attributes concerning program materials or content (e.g., emphasis on cessation preparation vs. maintenance techniques). Benefit manager response simulations indicated a low-cost program with flexible delivery options received the strongest overall response of the six types of programs tested. Results also suggested there were preference differences associated with the type of worksite. Implications of these results for future study are briefly discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79617,"journal":{"name":"Health values","volume":"14 5","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports the results of formative research on worksite benefit managers' preferences for smoking cessation programs. Procedures focused on application of a multi-attribute preference evaluation method known as conjoint analysis. Literature reviews, small-sample telephone interviews, and a focus group were used to guide selection of cessation program attributes for this analysis. Personnel benefit managers representing a variety of worksites (N = 103) across the U.S. were then randomly selected for participation in the study. Results suggested that cost per employee, program management options, success rates, and endorsements were associated with relatively higher utility values, as compared with attributes concerning program materials or content (e.g., emphasis on cessation preparation vs. maintenance techniques). Benefit manager response simulations indicated a low-cost program with flexible delivery options received the strongest overall response of the six types of programs tested. Results also suggested there were preference differences associated with the type of worksite. Implications of these results for future study are briefly discussed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福利管理者对戒烟计划偏好的多属性分析。
本文报告了对工作场所福利管理者对戒烟计划的偏好的形成性研究结果。程序侧重于应用一种多属性偏好评估方法,称为联合分析。文献综述、小样本电话访谈和焦点小组用于指导本分析中戒烟计划属性的选择。代表美国不同工作场所的人事福利管理人员(N = 103)被随机选择参与这项研究。结果表明,与项目材料或内容相关的属性(例如,强调戒烟准备与维持技术)相比,每个员工的成本、项目管理选项、成功率和认可与相对较高的实用价值相关。福利经理的反应模拟表明,具有灵活交付选择的低成本方案在六种测试方案中获得了最强烈的总体反应。研究结果还表明,人们对工作场所的偏好存在差异。本文简要讨论了这些结果对未来研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of a physical fitness program in a blue-collar workforce. Women as motivators in the use of safety belts. Establishing drug use questionnaire concurrent validity: methodological considerations. An assessment of dental care for the underserved. Multi-attribute analysis of benefit managers' preferences for smoking cessation programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1